41
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Are Extremes of Consumption in Eating Disorders Related to an Altered Balance between Reward and Inhibition?

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The primary defining characteristic of a diagnosis of an eating disorder (ED) is the “disturbance of eating or eating-related behavior that results in the altered consumption or absorption of food” (DSM V; American Psychiatric Association, 2013). There is a spectrum, ranging from those who severely restrict eating and become emaciated on one end to those who binge and overconsume, usually accompanied by some form of compensatory behaviors, on the other. How can we understand reasons for such extremes of food consummatory behaviors? Recent work on obesity and substance use disorders has identified behaviors and neural pathways that play a powerful role in human consummatory behaviors. That is, corticostriatal limbic and dorsal cognitive neural circuitry can make drugs and food rewarding, but also engage self-control mechanisms that may inhibit their use. Importantly, there is considerable evidence that alterations of these systems also occur in ED. This paper explores the hypothesis that an altered balance of reward and inhibition contributes to altered extremes of response to salient stimuli, such as food. We will review recent studies that show altered sensitivity to reward and punishment in ED, with evidence of altered activity in corticostriatal and insula processes with respect to monetary gains or losses, and tastes of palatable foods. We will also discuss evidence for a spectrum of extremes of inhibition and dysregulation behaviors in ED supported by studies suggesting that this is related to top-down self-control mechanisms. The lack of a mechanistic understanding of ED has thwarted efforts for evidence-based approaches to develop interventions. Understanding how ED behavior is encoded in neural circuits would provide a foundation for developing more specific and effective treatment approaches.

          Related collections

          Most cited references132

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards.

          When humans are offered the choice between rewards available at different points in time, the relative values of the options are discounted according to their expected delays until delivery. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we examined the neural correlates of time discounting while subjects made a series of choices between monetary reward options that varied by delay to delivery. We demonstrate that two separate systems are involved in such decisions. Parts of the limbic system associated with the midbrain dopamine system, including paralimbic cortex, are preferentially activated by decisions involving immediately available rewards. In contrast, regions of the lateral prefrontal cortex and posterior parietal cortex are engaged uniformly by intertemporal choices irrespective of delay. Furthermore, the relative engagement of the two systems is directly associated with subjects' choices, with greater relative fronto-parietal activity when subjects choose longer term options.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Neurobiology of emotion perception I: The neural basis of normal emotion perception.

            There is at present limited understanding of the neurobiological basis of the different processes underlying emotion perception. We have aimed to identify potential neural correlates of three processes suggested by appraisalist theories as important for emotion perception: 1) the identification of the emotional significance of a stimulus; 2) the production of an affective state in response to 1; and 3) the regulation of the affective state. In a critical review, we have examined findings from recent animal, human lesion, and functional neuroimaging studies. Findings from these studies indicate that these processes may be dependent upon the functioning of two neural systems: a ventral system, including the amygdala, insula, ventral striatum, and ventral regions of the anterior cingulate gyrus and prefrontal cortex, predominantly important for processes 1 and 2 and automatic regulation of emotional responses; and a dorsal system, including the hippocampus and dorsal regions of anterior cingulate gyrus and prefrontal cortex, predominantly important for process 3. We suggest that the extent to which a stimulus is identified as emotive and is associated with the production of an affective state may be dependent upon levels of activity within these two neural systems.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Getting formal with dopamine and reward.

              Recent neurophysiological studies reveal that neurons in certain brain structures carry specific signals about past and future rewards. Dopamine neurons display a short-latency, phasic reward signal indicating the difference between actual and predicted rewards. The signal is useful for enhancing neuronal processing and learning behavioral reactions. It is distinctly different from dopamine's tonic enabling of numerous behavioral processes. Neurons in the striatum, frontal cortex, and amygdala also process reward information but provide more differentiated information for identifying and anticipating rewards and organizing goal-directed behavior. The different reward signals have complementary functions, and the optimal use of rewards in voluntary behavior would benefit from interactions between the signals. Addictive psychostimulant drugs may exert their action by amplifying the dopamine reward signal.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : http://frontiersin.org/people/u/128178
                URI : http://frontiersin.org/people/u/191246
                URI : http://frontiersin.org/people/u/195413
                URI : http://frontiersin.org/people/u/172571
                URI : http://frontiersin.org/people/u/62141
                URI : http://frontiersin.org/people/u/149580
                Journal
                Front Behav Neurosci
                Front Behav Neurosci
                Front. Behav. Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1662-5153
                09 December 2014
                2014
                : 8
                : 410
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego , La Jolla, CA, USA
                [2] 2Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System , San Diego, CA, USA
                [3] 3Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Division of Biological Psychiatry, Austria Medical University of Vienna , Vienna, Austria
                Author notes

                Edited by: Nuno Sousa, University of Minho, Portugal

                Reviewed by: Franziska Plessow, Harvard Medical School, USA; Rachel Marsh, Columbia University Medical Center, USA

                *Correspondence: Walter H. Kaye, Department of Psychiatry, Eating Disorders Clinic, University of California San Diego, 4510 Executive Drive, Suite 315, San Diego, CA 92121, USA e-mail: wkaye@ 123456ucsd.edu

                This article was submitted to the journal Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience.

                Article
                10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00410
                4260511
                25538579
                0ad00408-5ab8-4ac1-a1da-7f2633a855e0
                Copyright © 2014 Wierenga, Ely, Bischoff-Grethe, Bailer, Simmons and Kaye.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 30 June 2014
                : 11 November 2014
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 172, Pages: 11, Words: 11930
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Hypothesis and Theory

                Neurosciences
                anorexia nervosa,bulimia nervosa,eating disorders,reward processing,inhibition,cognitive control,gustatory processing

                Comments

                Comment on this article