11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Active inference and the anatomy of oculomotion

      research-article
      * ,  
      Neuropsychologia
      Pergamon Press
      Free energy, Saccades, Oculomotor, Brainstem, Predictive coding, Active inference

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Given that eye movement control can be framed as an inferential process, how are the requisite forces generated to produce anticipated or desired fixation? Starting from a generative model based on simple Newtonian equations of motion, we derive a variational solution to this problem and illustrate the plausibility of its implementation in the oculomotor brainstem. We show, through simulation, that the Bayesian filtering equations that implement ‘planning as inference’ can generate both saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movements. Crucially, the associated message passing maps well onto the known connectivity and neuroanatomy of the brainstem – and the changes in these messages over time are strikingly similar to single unit recordings of neurons in the corresponding nuclei. Furthermore, we show that simulated lesions to axonal pathways reproduce eye movement patterns of neurological patients with damage to these tracts.

          Highlights

          • Eye movement control is cast as an inferential process that induces Newtonian rotational forces.

          • A plausible computational anatomy of Bayesian filtering in the brainstem is proposed.

          • Smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movements are simulated.

          • Lesions to the model cause similar patterns of eye movements to those found in neurological patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Noise in the nervous system.

          Noise--random disturbances of signals--poses a fundamental problem for information processing and affects all aspects of nervous-system function. However, the nature, amount and impact of noise in the nervous system have only recently been addressed in a quantitative manner. Experimental and computational methods have shown that multiple noise sources contribute to cellular and behavioural trial-to-trial variability. We review the sources of noise in the nervous system, from the molecular to the behavioural level, and show how noise contributes to trial-to-trial variability. We highlight how noise affects neuronal networks and the principles the nervous system applies to counter detrimental effects of noise, and briefly discuss noise's potential benefits.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The free-energy principle: a rough guide to the brain?

            This article reviews a free-energy formulation that advances Helmholtz's agenda to find principles of brain function based on conservation laws and neuronal energy. It rests on advances in statistical physics, theoretical biology and machine learning to explain a remarkable range of facts about brain structure and function. We could have just scratched the surface of what this formulation offers; for example, it is becoming clear that the Bayesian brain is just one facet of the free-energy principle and that perception is an inevitable consequence of active exchange with the environment. Furthermore, one can see easily how constructs like memory, attention, value, reinforcement and salience might disclose their simple relationships within this framework.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A common network of functional areas for attention and eye movements.

              Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and surface-based representations of brain activity were used to compare the functional anatomy of two tasks, one involving covert shifts of attention to peripheral visual stimuli, the other involving both attentional and saccadic shifts to the same stimuli. Overlapping regional networks in parietal, frontal, and temporal lobes were active in both tasks. This anatomical overlap is consistent with the hypothesis that attentional and oculomotor processes are tightly integrated at the neural level.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Neuropsychologia
                Neuropsychologia
                Neuropsychologia
                Pergamon Press
                0028-3932
                1873-3514
                1 March 2018
                March 2018
                : 111
                : 334-343
                Affiliations
                [0005]Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. thomas.parr.12@ 123456ucl.ac.uk
                Article
                S0028-3932(18)30047-2
                10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.01.041
                5884328
                29407941
                0b0cc07b-1557-4e1b-ab14-7f587d00d77b
                © 2018 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 24 October 2017
                : 7 January 2018
                : 29 January 2018
                Categories
                Article

                Neurology
                free energy,saccades,oculomotor,brainstem,predictive coding,active inference
                Neurology
                free energy, saccades, oculomotor, brainstem, predictive coding, active inference

                Comments

                Comment on this article