8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Addressing vulnerability of pregnant refugees

      editorial

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The number of refugees – defined as individuals fleeing war, violence or a well-founded fear of persecution based on race, religion, nationality, political opinion or membership in a particular social group 1 – is currently estimated at an unprecedented 22.5 million. 2 Countries resettling refugees urgently need to address the specific mental, physical and reproductive health needs of the growing number of refugee women. This is particularly important during pregnancy, when the vulnerability of refugee women is notably heightened, increasing their risk for largely preventable adverse maternal and newborn outcomes. In September 2016, during the United Nations Summit for Refugees and Migrants held in New York, the importance of tackling the specific vulnerabilities of refugee women was recognized by the United Nations General Assembly through the adoption of the New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants, 3 marking an international call to action. As Canadian health-care practitioners, our shared perspective is on the vital role high-income countries such as Canada can play in optimizing the health of refugee women. Although the majority of global refugees are currently hosted by low- and middle-income countries, 4 high-income countries with established refugee resettlement programmes such as Canada, Germany and Sweden have dramatically increased their resettlement efforts. This is reflected in a 77% increase in the number of refugees who resettled in high-income countries between 2015 and 2016. 4 However, studies that have explored health outcomes among resettled refugee women in countries such as Australia, Canada and Sweden demonstrate significant disparities in maternal and perinatal outcomes when compared to non-displaced women. 5 – 7 Disparities include higher rates of preterm birth, low birth-weight infants, stillbirths and maternal mortality. 5 – 7 These adverse outcomes do not only impact mothers and their newborns in the immediate perinatal period: growing evidence suggests that adverse birth outcomes can have long-lasting repercussions on the health and development of the newborn well into adulthood. For example, infants born preterm are at increased risk for developing chronic diseases such as hypertension, diabetes and cardiovascular disease later in life. 8 Moreover, evidence suggests that not only are first-generation migrant populations at increased risk of developing mental illness, but that this risk may persist into the second generation of resettled families. 9 Therefore, failing to address the complex health and social needs of pregnant refugee women resettling in high-income countries means missing valuable opportunities to optimize health across two generations. By implementing and ensuring accessibility to evidence-based health-care interventions, we can work to mitigate adverse maternal and newborn outcomes for refugee women resettling in high-income countries. Many of these adverse outcomes are related to largely preventable risk factors such as suboptimal health prior to conception, short inter-pregnancy intervals and difficulty accessing timely prenatal care, thus presenting opportunities to identify and treat preexisting maternal conditions. However, due to multiple factors including language barriers, cultural differences and difficulty navigating complex health and social systems in host countries, refugee women tend to have delayed initiation of prenatal care and fewer prenatal visits. 10 By addressing these barriers and ensuring refugee women have access to culturally sensitive reproductive care from conception to the postpartum period, we can reduce modifiable risk factors and strive to eliminate disparities in maternal and newborn outcomes. Moreover, interventions that improve maternal and newborn outcomes are cost–effective in the long term. 11  The direct and indirect costs incurred across the lifespan associated with high-risk pregnancies, preterm deliveries and low birth-weight infants are markedly higher than those associated with healthy term infants. 12 With developed nations increasingly challenged by ever-expanding health care expenditures, investing in targeted and cost–effective interventions, such as prenatal care for vulnerable populations – namely refugee women – is vital. Failing to do so may result in long-lasting morbidity for refugee mothers and their newborns and lead to costly long-term sequelae. In the context of the current global refugee crisis and international calls to protect the rights of refugees and eliminate striking disparities in the maternal and perinatal outcomes of refugee women, we must take urgent action to address their unmet health needs, particularly during the highly vulnerable time surrounding pregnancy. Through targeted, evidence-based and cost–effective interventions, we can ensure refugee women and their children are ultimately afforded equal opportunity to realize their full educational, social and economic potential as they rebuild their lives in their new homes. Though we have focused specifically on the role of high-income countries in doing so, this issue is global. Across high-, middle- and low-income countries alike, we cannot afford to ignore the United Nations’ call to action to protect and care for refugee women.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Preterm birth: risk factor for early-onset chronic diseases.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Pregnancy health status of sub-Saharan refugee women who have resettled in developed countries: a review of the literature.

            to present the literature relating to health status and pregnancy complications among sub-Saharan African women. sub-Saharan refugee women constitute a new and growing group of maternity service users in developed countries today. These women are perceived to be at high risk of pregnancy complication, based on concurrent disease and unusual medical conditions. As a result of these concerns, midwives may feel ill equipped to provide their pregnancy care. searches were conducted of CINAHL, Maternity and Infant Care, MEDLINE and PsychINFO databases using the search terms 'migrants', 'Africa', 'sub-Saharan', 'pregnancy', 'refugees' and 'women'. Additional articles were located by pursuing references identified in key papers. pregnant sub-Saharan women present as an at-risk population related to poor prior health, co-existing disease and cultural practices such as female genital mutilation. Nonetheless, principal pregnancy complications for this population include anaemia and high parity, rather than exotic disease. Higher rates of infant mortality and morbidity appear to persist following resettlement, and are not explained by maternal risk factors alone. Limited access to care is of concern. further research is warranted into the impediments to care uptake among sub-Saharan African women. It is hoped that such research will inform the development of culturally appropriate and acceptable services for African refugees. it is important that midwives are aware of common health problems among sub-Saharan women. Midwives also need to act to promote access to health services among this group. Social disadvantage and late access to care may impact on neonatal outcomes and thus warrant investigation. Copyright 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Obstetric risks and outcomes of refugee women at a single centre in Toronto.

              Women who are refugees during pregnancy may be exposed to homelessness, poor nutrition, and limited access to health care, yet the pregnancy outcomes of this vulnerable population have not been systematically evaluated. We undertook a study to determine the risk of adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes among refugee women in Toronto.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Bull World Health Organ
                Bull. World Health Organ
                BLT
                Bulletin of the World Health Organization
                World Health Organization
                0042-9686
                1564-0604
                01 September 2017
                01 September 2017
                : 95
                : 9
                : 611-611A
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada.
                [b ]Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
                Author notes
                Correspondence to Mary Malebranche (email: mary.malebranche@ 123456ucalgary.ca ).
                Article
                BLT.17.193664
                10.2471/BLT.17.193664
                5578387
                28867838
                0b41225a-869e-401d-9e68-778230dda83b
                (c) 2017 The authors; licensee World Health Organization.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution IGO License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/legalcode), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In any reproduction of this article there should not be any suggestion that WHO or this article endorse any specific organization or products. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article's original URL.

                History
                Categories
                Editorials

                Comments

                Comment on this article