8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Multimodal Approach toward Pain Relief during Dilatation and Curettage: A Randomized Clinical Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Introduction

          Dilatation and curettage (D&C) is one of the most common minor procedures in gynecology performed mainly as an outpatient basis procedure for the evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). Various forms of analgesia used include local anesthesia like paracervical block (PCB) or intracervical block, intrauterine instillation of local anesthetic agent, rectal/oral/parenteral use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) and opioids, sedatives and hypnotics, and even general anesthesia. This study was undertaken to compare various routes of local analgesia for the D&C procedure.

          Aim

          The aim of this study was to compare the pain scores before and after administering the local anesthetic agent 2% lidocaine in D&C procedure.

          Design

          The design of this study includes a prospective interventional study (September 2016 to August 2018) in 220 AUB patients attending gynaecology clinics of Kasturba Hospital, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

          Method

          The visual analog scale (VAS) was used for pain assessment, and SPSS16 was used for data analysis.

          Result

          During cervical dilatation, paracervical block has better pain relief and during curettage intrauterine instillation lidocaine provides adequate pain control, and the combined use of paracervical and intrauterine lidocaine is superior for pain relief and also provides long-lasting pain relief even following the procedure.

          Conclusion

          Lidocaine administration is safe, effective, and can be a good alternative to other forms of analgesia, both regional and general.

          How to cite this article

          Kanchan S, Hebbar S. A Multimodal Approach toward Pain Relief during Dilatation and Curettage: A Randomized Clinical Study. J South Asian Feder Obst Gynae 2023;15(3):261–268.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Comparing Transcervical Intrauterine Lidocaine Instillation with Rectal Diclofenac for Pain Relief During Outpatient Hysteroscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

          There are a number of potential advantages to performing hysteroscopy in an outpatient setting. However, the ideal approach, using local uterine anesthesia or rectal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, has not been determined. Our objective was to compare the efficacy of intrauterine lidocaine instillation with rectal diclofenac for pain relief during diagnostic hysteroscopy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Analgesic efficacy and safety of paracervical block versus conscious sedation in the surgical evacuation of the uterus following first-trimester incomplete miscarriages: A randomised controlled trial

            Objective: To compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of paracervical block and conscious sedation in the surgical evacuation of the uterus following a first-trimester miscarriage. Methods: This is an open-label, randomised control trial comparing pain relief by paracervical block versus conscious sedation during manual vacuum aspiration of first-trimester incomplete miscarriages. One-hundred and sixty-two women were equally randomised into two groups. Group A (paracervical group) received a paracervical block of 4 ml of lidocaine each at the 4 and 8 o’clock positions. Group B (conscious sedation group) received intravenous 30 mg pentazocine and 10 mg diazepam. Data obtained were presented using a frequency table, student t-test, chi-square and Mann–Whitney test and bar chart. A P-value of ⩽0.05 was taken to be statistically significant. Results: The mean pain score was lower in the paracervical block group compared to the conscious sedation group (P < 0.05); however, there was no significant difference in women’s satisfaction between the groups (P ⩾ 0.05). Conscious sedation had more negative side effects compared to paracervical block which was significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Paracervical block has better pain control compared with conscious sedation and has a good side effect profile. Trial registration: Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (registered trial no. PACTR202108841661192). Synopsis Paracervical block for manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) during first-trimester miscarriage is associated with less pain among women compared with conscious sedation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Intrauterine lignocaine versus paracervical block for pain relief during cervical dilatation and endometrial curettage.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JSAFOG
                Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
                JSAFOG
                Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
                0974-8938
                0975-1920
                May-June 2023
                : 15
                : 3
                : 261-268
                Affiliations
                [1,2 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Manipal University, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Karnataka, India
                Author notes
                Swati Kanchan, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Manipal University, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Karnataka, India, Phone: +91 9845542488, e-mail: swati.kanchan89@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                10.5005/jp-journals-10006-2219
                0b5d3bf7-6b6f-4a3a-9a43-24ef557b9b03
                Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).

                © The Author(s). 2023 Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 17 November 2022
                : 12 December 2022
                : 31 July 2023
                Categories
                ORIGINAL RESEARCH
                Custom metadata
                jsafog-15-261.pdf

                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                Intrauterine instillation,Lidocaine,Paracervical block,Dilatation and curettage,Abnormal uterine bleeding

                Comments

                Comment on this article