22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The ReCoN intervention: a co-created comprehensive intervention for primary mental health care aiming to prevent involuntary admissions

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Reducing involuntary psychiatric admissions is a global concern. In Norway, the rate of involuntary admissions was 199 per 100,000 people 16 years and older in 2020. Individuals’ paths towards involuntary psychiatric admissions usually unfold when they live in the community and referrals to such admissions are often initiated by primary health care professionals. Interventions at the primary health care level can therefore have the potential to prevent such admissions. Interventions developed specifically for this care level are, however, lacking. To enhance the quality and development of services in a way that meets stakeholders’ needs and facilitates implementation to practice, involving both persons with lived experience and service providers in developing such interventions is requested.

          Aim

          To develop a comprehensive intervention for primary mental health care aiming to prevent involuntary admissions of adults.

          Methods

          This study had an action research approach with a participatory research design. Dialogue conferences with multiple stakeholders in five Norwegian municipalities, inductive thematic analysis of data material from the conferences, and a series of feedback meetings were conducted.

          Results

          The co-creation process resulted in the development of the ReCoN (Reducing Coercion in Norway) intervention. This is a comprehensive intervention that includes six strategy areas: [1] Management, [2] Involving Persons with Lived Experience and Family Carers, [3] Competence Development, [4] Collaboration across Primary and Specialist Care Levels, [5] Collaboration within the Primary Care Level, and [6] Tailoring Individual Services. Each strategy area has two to four action areas with specified measures that constitute the practical actions or tasks that are believed to collectively impact the need for involuntary admissions.

          Conclusions

          The ReCoN intervention has the potential for application to both national and international mental health services. The co-creation process with the full range of stakeholders ensures face validity, acceptability, and relevance. The effectiveness of the ReCoN intervention is currently being tested in a cluster randomised controlled trial. Given positive effects, the ReCoN intervention may impact individuals with a severe mental illness at risk of involuntary admissions, as more people may experience empowerment and autonomy instead of coercion in their recovery process.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Using thematic analysis in psychology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide

            Without a complete published description of interventions, clinicians and patients cannot reliably implement interventions that are shown to be useful, and other researchers cannot replicate or build on research findings. The quality of description of interventions in publications, however, is remarkably poor. To improve the completeness of reporting, and ultimately the replicability, of interventions, an international group of experts and stakeholders developed the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. The process involved a literature review for relevant checklists and research, a Delphi survey of an international panel of experts to guide item selection, and a face to face panel meeting. The resultant 12 item TIDieR checklist (brief name, why, what (materials), what (procedure), who provided, how, where, when and how much, tailoring, modifications, how well (planned), how well (actual)) is an extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement (item 5) and the SPIRIT 2013 statement (item 11). While the emphasis of the checklist is on trials, the guidance is intended to apply across all evaluative study designs. This paper presents the TIDieR checklist and guide, with an explanation and elaboration for each item, and examples of good reporting. The TIDieR checklist and guide should improve the reporting of interventions and make it easier for authors to structure accounts of their interventions, reviewers and editors to assess the descriptions, and readers to use the information.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance

              Evaluating complex interventions is complicated. The Medical Research Council's evaluation framework (2000) brought welcome clarity to the task. Now the council has updated its guidance
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                irene.wormdahl@samforsk.no
                Journal
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Services Research
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6963
                19 July 2022
                19 July 2022
                2022
                : 22
                : 931
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.458589.d, Norwegian Resource Centre for Community Mental Health, , NTNU Social Research, ; Trondheim, Norway
                [2 ]GRID grid.5947.f, ISNI 0000 0001 1516 2393, Department of Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, , Norwegian University of Science and Technology, ; Trondheim, Norway
                [3 ]GRID grid.5510.1, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8921, Centre for Medical Ethics, , Institute for Health & Society, University of Oslo, ; Oslo, Norway
                [4 ]GRID grid.412414.6, ISNI 0000 0000 9151 4445, Faculty of Health Sciences, , Oslo Metropolitan University, ; Oslo, Norway
                [5 ]GRID grid.411279.8, ISNI 0000 0000 9637 455X, Health Service Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital, ; Lørenskog, Norway
                [6 ]GRID grid.463530.7, ISNI 0000 0004 7417 509X, Centre for Care Research, , University of South-Eastern Norway, ; Porsgrunn, Norway
                [7 ] Department of Health Care, Ullensaker Municipality, Ullensaker, Norway
                [8 ] Department of Mental Health and Addiction, Nittedal Municipality, Nittedal, Norway
                [9 ] Department of Mental Health and Addiction, Elverum Municipality, Elverum, Norway
                [10 ]Department of Mental Health and Addiction, Porsgrunn Municipality, Porsgrunn, Norway
                [11 ] Department of Mental Health and Addiction, Grimstad Municipality, Grimstad, Norway
                [12 ]Mental Health Carers Norway Grimstad and environs, Grimstad, Norway
                [13 ]Mental Health Norway Nittedal, Nittedal, Norway
                Article
                8302
                10.1186/s12913-022-08302-w
                9296016
                35854270
                0ba3ac20-8aaa-4d70-aa68-044102d85bee
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 2 September 2021
                : 5 July 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology (incl St. Olavs Hospital - Trondheim University Hospital)
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Health & Social care
                involuntary admission,severe mental illness,mental health services,primary care,mental health recovery,co-creation,participatory research

                Comments

                Comment on this article