19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression in the diagnostic phase of suspected cancer, and the influence of diagnosis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Undergoing diagnostic evaluation for cancer has been associated with a high prevalence of anxiety and depression and affected health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The aims of this study were to assess HRQoL, anxiety, and depression pre- and post-diagnosis in patients undergoing diagnostic evaluations for cancer due to non-specific symptoms; to examine changes over time in relation to final diagnosis (cancer yes/no); and to assess the predictive value of pre-diagnostic psychological, socio-demographic and clinical factors.

          Methods

          A prospective, multicenter survey study of patients suspected to have cancer based on non-specific symptoms was performed. Participants completed the EORTC-QLQ-C30 quality of life scale, HADS, SOC-13 and self-rated health before and after completing diagnostic evaluations. Intra- and inter-group differences between patients diagnosed with cancer versus patients with non-cancer diagnoses were calculated. The impact of baseline psychological, socio-demographic, and medical factors on HRQoL, anxiety and depression at follow-up was explored by bootstrapped multivariate linear regression analyses and logistic regression analyses.

          Results

          A total of 838 patients participated in this study; 679 (81 %) completed the follow-up. Twenty-two percent of the patients received a cancer diagnosis at the end of the follow-up. Patients presented initially with a high burden of symptoms and affected role and emotional functioning and global health/QL, irrespective of diagnosis. The prevalence of clinical anxiety prior to knowledge of the diagnosis was 32 % in patients with cancer and 35 % in patients who received a non-cancer diagnosis. HRQoL and anxiety improved after diagnosis, and a larger improvement was seen in patients who received a non-cancer diagnosis. There were no intra- or inter-group differences in the depression scores. The strongest predictors of global QL, anxiety, and depression after a known diagnosis were baseline scores, co-morbidity and poor self-rated health.

          Conclusions

          Patients undergoing diagnostic evaluations for cancer based on non-specific symptoms experience a high prevalence of anxiety and affected quality of life prior to knowledge of the diagnosis. The predictive value of the baseline scores is important when assessing the psychological impact of undergoing diagnostic evaluations for cancer.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies.

          We examine the growing number of studies of survey respondents' global self-ratings of health as predictors of mortality in longitudinal studies of representative community samples. Twenty-seven studies in U.S. and international journals show impressively consistent findings. Global self-rated health is an independent predictor of mortality in nearly all of the studies, despite the inclusion of numerous specific health status indicators and other relevant covariates known to predict mortality. We summarize and review these studies, consider various interpretations which could account for the association, and suggest several approaches to the next stage of research in this field.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores.

            To determine the significance to patients of changes in health-related quality-of-life (HLQ) scores assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30). A subjective significance questionnaire (SSQ), which asks patients about perceived changes in physical, emotional, and social functioning and in global quality of life (global QL) and the QLQ-C30 were completed by patients who received chemotherapy for either breast cancer or small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). In the SSQ, patients rated their perception of change since the last time they completed the QLQ-C30 using a 7-category scale that ranged from "much worse" through "no change" to "much better." For each category of change in the SSQ, the corresponding differences were calculated in QLQ-C30 mean scores and effect sizes were determined. For patients who indicated "no change" in the SSQ, the mean change in scores in the corresponding QLQ-C30 domains was not significantly different from 0. For patients who indicated "a little" change either for better or for worse, the mean change in scores was about 5 to 10; for "moderate" change, about 10 to 20; and for "very much" change, greater than 20. Effect sizes increased in concordance with increasing changes in SSQ ratings and QLQ-C30 scores. The significance of changes in QLQ-C30 scores can be interpreted in terms of small, moderate, or large changes in quality of life as reported by patients in the SSQ. The magnitude of these changes also can be used to calculate the sample sizes required to detect a specified change in clinical trials.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              International experiences with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale--a review of validation data and clinical results.

              More than 200 published studies from most medical settings worldwide have reported experiences with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) which was specifically developed by Zigmond and Snaith for use with physically ill patients. Although introduced in 1983, there is still no comprehensive documentation of its psychometric properties. The present review summarizes available data on reliability and validity and gives an overview of clinical studies conducted with this instrument and their most important findings. The HADS gives clinically meaningful results as a psychological screening tool, in clinical group comparisons and in correlational studies with several aspects of disease and quality of life. It is sensitive to changes both during the course of diseases and in response to psychotherapeutic and psychopharmacological intervention. Finally, HADS scores predict psychosocial and possibly also physical outcome.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +45 26 70 25 48 , elar0073@regionh.dk
                Journal
                Health Qual Life Outcomes
                Health Qual Life Outcomes
                Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
                BioMed Central (London )
                1477-7525
                20 May 2016
                20 May 2016
                2016
                : 14
                : 80
                Affiliations
                [ ]Department of Pulmonary and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Nordsjælland, Dyrehavevej 29, DK - 3400 Hillerød, Denmark
                [ ]Research Unit of Clinical Nursing, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg University Hospital, and Department of Public Health, Section for Nursing, Aarhus University, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 20D, Copenhagen, NV DK- 2400 Denmark
                [ ]Department of Nursing, Metropolitan University College, Tagensvej 86, Copenhagen, N DK - 2200 Denmark
                [ ]Department of Endocrinology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Herlev Ringvej 75, Building 64, Herlev, DK-2730 Denmark
                [ ]Department of Gastroenterology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg University Hospital, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 60, Copenhagen, NV DK- 2400 Denmark
                [ ]Department of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, Department 144, Hvidovre, DK- 2650 Denmark
                Article
                484
                10.1186/s12955-016-0484-9
                4873991
                27206557
                0bbdbb09-09be-4696-a802-b25891f17615
                © Moseholm et al. 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 9 November 2015
                : 12 May 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004191, Novo Nordisk (DK);
                Award ID: NNF13OC0006093
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Copenhagen University Hospital, Nordsjælland
                Award ID: Research grant 2013
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Health & Social care
                cancer,oncology,pre-diagnosis,health-related quality of life,anxiety,depression
                Health & Social care
                cancer, oncology, pre-diagnosis, health-related quality of life, anxiety, depression

                Comments

                Comment on this article