14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Students’ satisfaction and perceived impact on knowledge, attitudes and skills after a 2-day course in scientific writing: a prospective longitudinal study in Spain

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          This study aimed to determine students’ satisfaction with a 2-day course on scientific writing in health sciences and to assess their perceptions of the long-term impact on their knowledge, attitudes and skills.

          Setting

          27 iterations of a 2-day course on writing and publishing scientific articles in health sciences.

          Participants

          741 students attending the 27 courses.

          Design

          Prospective longitudinal study.

          Primary and secondary outcome measures

          Immediately after each course, students completed a first questionnaire, rating their satisfaction with different aspects of the classroom sessions on a Likert scale (0–5). Approximately 2 years after the course, students completed a follow-up questionnaire, using a Likert scale (0–4) to rate their knowledge, skills and attitudes in relation to scientific writing before and after attending the course.

          Results

          741 students (70% women) participated in the 27 iterations of the course; 568 (76.8%) completed the first questionnaire and 182 (24.6%) completed the follow-up questionnaire. The first questionnaire reflected high overall satisfaction (mean score, 4.6). In the second questionnaire, students reported that the course had improved their knowledge (mean improvement: 1.6; 95% CI 1.6 to 1.7), attitudes (mean improvement: 1.3; 95% CI 1.2 to 1.4) and skills (mean improvement: 1.4; 95% CI 1.3 to 1.4) related to writing and publishing scientific papers. Most respondents (n=145, 79.7%) had participated in drafting a scientific paper after the course; in this subgroup, all the specific writing skills assessed in the second questionnaire significantly improved.

          Conclusions

          Students were satisfied with the format and the contents of the course, and those who responded to the follow-up survey considered that the course had improved their knowledge, attitudes and skills in relation to scientific writing and publishing. Courses are particularly important in countries without strong traditions in scientific publication.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Publish or perish: a systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Writing for publication in medical education: the benefits of a faculty development workshop and peer writing group.

            Although educational innovations in medical education are increasing in number, many educators do not submit their ideas for publication.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              A systematic review highlights a knowledge gap regarding the effectiveness of health-related training programs in journalology.

              To investigate whether training in writing for scholarly publication, journal editing, or manuscript peer review effectively improves educational outcomes related to the quality of health research reporting.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2018
                27 January 2018
                : 8
                : 1
                : e018657
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentTobacco Control Unit , Institut Català d’Oncologia (ICO-IDIBELL) , Barcelona, Spain
                [2 ] departmentDepartment of Clinical Sciences , School of Medicine, Campus de Bellvitge, Universitat de Barcelona, L’Hospitalet del Llobregat , Barcelona, Spain
                [3 ] departmentDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health , Universitat de València , Valencia, Spain
                [4 ] Esteve Foundation , Barcelona, Spain
                [5 ] departmentDepartment of Experimental and Health Sciences , School of Health and Life Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra , Barcelona, Spain
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr. Esteve Fernández; efernandez@ 123456iconcologia.net

                Preliminary results of this study ‘Fernández E, García AM, Serés E, Bosch F. Ten years’ experience teaching health professionals to write and to publish articles. Available at ' were presented in poster format at the Seventh International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publications, 8-10 September 2013, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

                Article
                bmjopen-2017-018657
                10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018657
                5829667
                29374664
                0bbfc296-a6f7-4fd7-a649-b50d1ddd1f74
                © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

                This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                History
                : 13 July 2017
                : 23 November 2017
                : 30 November 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: EF was partly funded by the Department of Universities and Research, Government of Catalonia;
                Categories
                Medical Education and Training
                Research
                1506
                1709
                1354
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                journalology,publishing,observationl study
                Medicine
                journalology, publishing, observationl study

                Comments

                Comment on this article