33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Secondary Hyperalgesia Phenotypes Exhibit Differences in Brain Activation during Noxious Stimulation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Noxious stimulation of the skin with either chemical, electrical or heat stimuli leads to the development of primary hyperalgesia at the site of injury, and to secondary hyperalgesia in normal skin surrounding the injury. Secondary hyperalgesia is inducible in most individuals and is attributed to central neuronal sensitization. Some individuals develop large areas of secondary hyperalgesia (high-sensitization responders), while others develop small areas (low-sensitization responders). The magnitude of each area is reproducible within individuals, and can be regarded as a phenotypic characteristic. To study differences in the propensity to develop central sensitization we examined differences in brain activity and anatomy according to individual phenotypical expression of secondary hyperalgesia by magnetic resonance imaging. Forty healthy volunteers received a first-degree burn-injury (47°C, 7 min, 9 cm 2) on the non-dominant lower-leg. Areas of secondary hyperalgesia were assessed 100 min after the injury. We measured neuronal activation by recording blood-oxygen-level-dependent-signals (BOLD-signals) during mechanical noxious stimulation before burn injury and in both primary and secondary hyperalgesia areas after burn-injury. In addition, T1-weighted images were used to measure differences in gray-matter density in cortical and subcortical regions of the brain. We found significant differences in neuronal activity between high- and low-sensitization responders at baseline (before application of the burn-injury) ( p < 0.05). After the burn-injury, we found significant differences between responders during noxious stimulation of both primary ( p < 0.01) and secondary hyperalgesia ( p ≤ 0.04) skin areas. A decreased volume of the right ( p = 0.001) and left caudate nucleus ( p = 0.01) was detected in high-sensitization responders in comparison to low-sensitization responders. These findings suggest that brain-structure and neuronal activation to noxious stimulation differs according to secondary hyperalgesia phenotype. This indicates differences in central sensitization according to phenotype, which may have predictive value on the susceptibility to development of high-intensity acute and persistent pain.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Assignment of functional activations to probabilistic cytoarchitectonic areas revisited.

          Probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps in standard reference space provide a powerful tool for the analysis of structure-function relationships in the human brain. While these microstructurally defined maps have already been successfully used in the analysis of somatosensory, motor or language functions, several conceptual issues in the analysis of structure-function relationships still demand further clarification. In this paper, we demonstrate the principle approaches for anatomical localisation of functional activations based on probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps by exemplary analysis of an anterior parietal activation evoked by visual presentation of hand gestures. After consideration of the conceptual basis and implementation of volume or local maxima labelling, we comment on some potential interpretational difficulties, limitations and caveats that could be encountered. Extending and supplementing these methods, we then propose a supplementary approach for quantification of structure-function correspondences based on distribution analysis. This approach relates the cytoarchitectonic probabilities observed at a particular functionally defined location to the areal specific null distribution of probabilities across the whole brain (i.e., the full probability map). Importantly, this method avoids the need for a unique classification of voxels to a single cortical area and may increase the comparability between results obtained for different areas. Moreover, as distribution-based labelling quantifies the "central tendency" of an activation with respect to anatomical areas, it will, in combination with the established methods, allow an advanced characterisation of the anatomical substrates of functional activations. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of the various methods are discussed, focussing on the question of which approach is most appropriate for a particular situation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Controlling the familywise error rate in functional neuroimaging: a comparative review.

            Functional neuroimaging data embodies a massive multiple testing problem, where 100,000 correlated test statistics must be assessed. The familywise error rate, the chance of any false positives is the standard measure of Type I errors in multiple testing. In this paper we review and evaluate three approaches to thresholding images of test statistics: Bonferroni, random field and the permutation test. Owing to recent developments, improved Bonferroni procedures, such as Hochberg's methods, are now applicable to dependent data. Continuous random field methods use the smoothness of the image to adapt to the severity of the multiple testing problem. Also, increased computing power has made both permutation and bootstrap methods applicable to functional neuroimaging. We evaluate these approaches on t images using simulations and a collection of real datasets. We find that Bonferroni-related tests offer little improvement over Bonferroni, while the permutation method offers substantial improvement over the random field method for low smoothness and low degrees of freedom. We also show the limitations of trying to find an equivalent number of independent tests for an image of correlated test statistics.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Evidence for a central component of post-injury pain hypersensitivity.

              C J Woolf (2015)
              Noxious skin stimuli which are sufficiently intense to produce tissue injury, characteristically generate prolonged post-stimulus sensory disturbances that include continuing pain, an increased sensitivity to noxious stimuli and pain following innocuous stimuli. This could result from either a reduction in the thresholds of skin nociceptors (sensitization) or an increase in the excitability of the central nervous system so that normal inputs now evoke exaggerated responses. Because sensitization of peripheral receptors occurs following injury, a peripheral mechanism is widely held to be responsible for post-injury hypersensitivity. To investigate this I have now developed an animal model where changes occur in the threshold and responsiveness of the flexor reflex following peripheral injury that are analogous to the sensory changes found in man. Electrophysiological analysis of the injury-induced increase in excitability of the flexion reflex shows that it in part arises from changes in the activity of the spinal cord. The long-term consequences of noxious stimuli result, therefore, from central as well as from peripheral changes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                2015
                23 January 2015
                : 10
                : 1
                : e0114840
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Anaesthesia, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospitals, Copenhagen, Denmark
                [2 ]Multidisciplinary Pain Centre, Neuroscience Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospitals, Copenhagen, Denmark
                [3 ]Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany
                [4 ]Department of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
                [5 ]Functional Imaging Unit, Hospital, Glostrup, Copenhagen University Hospitals, Glostrup, Denmark
                University of South California, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have no competing interests to declare.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: MSA MUW HBWL JBD. Performed the experiments: MSA MPP. Analyzed the data: MSA MPP MUW JM JBD. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MSA HBWL JM MUW JBD. Wrote the paper: MSA MUW JM JBD.

                ☯ These authors contributed equally to this work.

                Article
                PONE-D-14-32913
                10.1371/journal.pone.0114840
                4304709
                25615578
                0bc5ec24-6ec2-4eb0-9ce2-4538f7fc1789
                Copyright @ 2015

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

                History
                : 23 July 2014
                : 14 November 2014
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 9, Pages: 21
                Funding
                The study was supported by grants from Danish Society for Anaesthesiology and Intensive Medicine (DASAIM), The Sofus Johannesens Foundation, Torben and Alice Frimodts Foundation, and Aase and Einar Danielsens Foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The corresponding author had full access to all the study data and had the final responsibility to submit for publication.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                All the relevant data to replicate this study and the data points from the images are available in the paper or in the supplementary files submitted with the paper. The raw data files for the fMRI images cannot be made available online due to the large file size, but are available upon request from the corresponding author (Dr. Mohammad Sohail Asghar).

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article