5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      NRQCD Factorization and Universality of NRQCD Matrix Elements

      Preprint
      ,

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The approach of nonrelativistic QCD(NRQCD) factorization was proposed to study inclusive production of a quarkonium. It is widely used and successful. However, a recent study of gluon fragmentation into a quarkonium at two-loop level shows that the factorization is broken. It is suggested that the color-octet NRQCD matrix elements should be modified by adding a gauge link to restore the factorization. The modified matrix elements may have extra soft-divergences at one-loop level which the unmodified can not have, and this can lead to a violation of the universality of these matrix elements. In this letter, we examine in detail the NRQCD factorization for inclusive quarkonium production in \(e^+ e^-\) annihilation at one-loop level. Our results show that the factorization can be made without the modification of NRQCD matrix elements and it can also be made for relativistic corrections. It turns out that the suggested gauge link will not lead to nonzero contributions to color-octet NRQCD matrix elements at one-loop level and at any order of \(v\). Therefore the universality holds at least at one-loop level.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          07 June 2005
          2005-08-03
          Article
          10.1016/j.physletb.2005.08.057
          hep-ph/0506078
          0c11e1d3-2efe-4400-aaf8-c6c6e0d6dfc8
          History
          Custom metadata
          Phys.Lett. B625 (2005) 67-75
          More explanation about different terms in the velocity expansion
          hep-ph

          Comments

          Comment on this article