39
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Does socioeconomic disparity in cancer incidence vary across racial/ethnic groups?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Very few studies have simultaneously examined incidence of the leading cancers in relation to socioeconomic status (SES) and race/ethnicity in populations including Hispanics and Asians. This study aims to describe SES disparity in cancer incidence within each of four major racial/ethnic groups (non-Hispanic white, black, Hispanic, and Asian/Pacific Islander) for five major cancer sites, including female breast cancer, colorectal cancer, cervical cancer, lung cancer, and prostate cancer.

          Methods

          Invasive cancers of the five major sites diagnosed from 1998 to 2002 ( n = 376,158) in California were included in the study. Composite area-based SES measures were used to quantify SES level and to calculate cancer incidence rates stratified by SES. Relative index of inequality (RII) was generated to measure SES gradient of cancer incidence within each racial/ethnic group.

          Results

          Significant variations were detected in SES disparities across the racial/ethnic groups for all five major cancer sites. Female breast cancer and prostate cancer incidence increased with increased SES in all groups, with the trend strongest among Hispanics. Incidence of cervical cancer increased with decreased SES, with the largest gradient among non-Hispanic white women. Lung cancer incidence increased with decreased SES with the exception of Hispanic men and women, for whom SES gradient was in the opposite direction. For colorectal cancer, higher incidence was associated with lower SES in non-Hispanic whites but with higher SES in Hispanics and Asian/Pacific Islander women.

          Conclusions

          Examining SES disparity stratified by race/ethnicity enhances our understanding of the complex relationships between cancer incidence, SES, and race/ethnicity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and cancer incidence: does the choice of area-based measure and geographic level matter?: the Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project.

          N Krieger (2002)
          Despite the promise of geocoding and use of area-based socioeconomic measures to overcome the paucity of socioeconomic data in US public health surveillance systems, no consensus exists as to which measures should be used or at which level of geography. The authors generated diverse single-variable and composite area-based socioeconomic measures at the census tract, block group, and zip code level for Massachusetts (1990 population: 6,016,425) and Rhode Island (1990 population: 1,003,464) to investigate their associations with mortality rates (1989-1991: 156,366 resident deaths in Massachusetts and 27,291 in Rhode Island) and incidence of primary invasive cancer (1988-1992: 140,610 resident cases in Massachusetts; 1989-1992: 19,808 resident cases in Rhode Island). Analyses of all-cause and cause-specific mortality rates and all-cause and site-specific cancer incidence rates indicated that: 1) block group and tract socioeconomic measures performed comparably within and across both states, but zip code measures for several outcomes detected no gradients or gradients contrary to those observed with tract and block group measures; 2) similar gradients were detected with categories generated by quintiles and by a priori categorical cutpoints; and 3) measures including data on economic poverty were most robust and detected gradients that were unobserved using measures of only education and wealth.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Multilevel analyses of neighbourhood socioeconomic context and health outcomes: a critical review

            K Pickett (2001)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Socioeconomic status and breast cancer incidence in California for different race/ethnic groups.

              The majority of research on breast cancer risk and socioeconomic status (SES) has been conducted for blacks and whites. This study evaluates the relationship between SES and breast cancer incidence in California for four race/ethnic groups. Principal component analysis was used to create an SES index using 1990 Census data. Untracted cases were randomly allocated to census block groups within their county of residence. A total of 97,227 female breast cancer cases diagnosed in California between 1988 and 1992 were evaluated. Incidence rates and rate ratios (RRs) were estimated and a chi2 test for trend across SES levels was performed. SES was positively related to breast cancer incidence, and this effect was stronger for Hispanics and Asian/others than for whites and blacks. Adjusting by SES did not eliminate the differences in breast cancer rates among race/ethnic groups. RR differences between the race/ethnic groups were greatest in the lowest SES category and attenuated with increasing SES. An increasing trend over SES was statistically significant for all race/ethnic groups. Including randomly allocated cases affected RR estimates for white women only. Our results are consistent with similar findings for the Los Angeles area but differ from previous results for the San Francisco Bay area.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                dyin@ccr.ca.gov
                Journal
                Cancer Causes Control
                Cancer Causes & Control
                Springer Netherlands (Dordrecht )
                0957-5243
                1573-7225
                22 June 2010
                22 June 2010
                October 2010
                : 21
                : 10
                : 1721-1730
                Affiliations
                [1 ]California Cancer Registry, Public Health Institute, 1825 Bell Street, Suite 102, Sacramento, CA 95825 USA
                [2 ]Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA USA
                [3 ]Cancer Surveillance Program, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA USA
                Article
                9601
                10.1007/s10552-010-9601-y
                2941051
                20567897
                0c320109-a970-426d-8b94-18c39958b499
                © The Author(s) 2010
                History
                : 25 January 2010
                : 3 June 2010
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                race/ethnicity,socioeconomic status,cancer incidence,disparity
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, cancer incidence, disparity

                Comments

                Comment on this article