13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      How prostacyclin therapy improves right ventricular function in pulmonary arterial hypertension

      The European Respiratory Journal
      European Respiratory Society

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Within recent years, right ventricular (RV) function has been recognised as a major determinant of outcome in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) [1, 2]. Clinical [3] and in vitro experimental [4, 5] data suggest that prostacyclins, the treatment of choice for most severely ill PAH patients [6], might have a positive inotropic effect on RV function, and reduce pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). Nevertheless, inotropic effects are difficult to demonstrate in vivo, as ventricular contractility adjusts to afterload to preserve ventricular-arterial coupling [7]. In fact, the ratio of ventricular end-systolic elastance (Ees), a measure of in vivo contractility, to pulmonary arterial elastance (Ea) or the “coupling ratio” (Ees/Ea), was restored by epoprostenol in a model of load-induced acute RV failure; however, this was explained by a reduction in afterload [8].

          Abstract

          Prostacyclin reduces right ventricular contractility, but improves ejection fraction and exercise capacity in PAH http://ow.ly/m5S830dpcZv

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Right heart adaptation to pulmonary arterial hypertension: physiology and pathobiology.

          Survival in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is closely related to right ventricular (RV) function. Although pulmonary load is an important determinant of RV systolic function in PAH, there remains a significant variability in RV adaptation to pulmonary hypertension. In this report, the authors discuss the emerging concepts of right heart pathobiology in PAH. More specifically, the discussion focuses on the following questions. 1) How is right heart failure syndrome best defined? 2) What are the underlying molecular mechanisms of the failing right ventricle in PAH? 3) How are RV contractility and function and their prognostic implications best assessed? 4) What is the role of targeted RV therapy? Throughout the report, the authors highlight differences between right and left heart failure and outline key areas of future investigation. Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            RV-pulmonary arterial coupling predicts outcome in patients referred for pulmonary hypertension.

            Prognosis in pulmonary hypertension (PH) is largely determined by RV function. However, uncertainty remains about what metrics of RV function might be most clinically relevant. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical relevance of metrics of RV functional adaptation to increased afterload.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Single-beat estimation of right ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume relationship.

              Assessment of right ventricular (RV) contractility from end-systolic pressure-volume relationships (ESPVR) is difficult due to problems in measuring RV instantaneous volume and to effects of changes in RV preload or afterload. We therefore investigated in anesthetized dogs whether RV ESPVR and contractility can be determined without measuring RV volume and without changing RV preload or afterload. The maximal RV pressure of isovolumic beats (P(max)) was predicted from isovolumic portions of RV pressure during ejecting beats and compared with P(max) measured during the first beat after pulmonary artery clamping. In RV pressure-volume loops obtained from RV pressure and integrated pulmonary arterial flow, end-systolic elastance (E(es)) was assessed as the slope of P(max)-derived ESPVR, pulmonary artery effective elastance (E(a)) as the slope of end-diastolic to end-systolic relation, and coupling efficiency as the E(es)-to-E(a) ratio (E(es)/E(a)). Predicted P(max) correlated with observed P(max) (r = 0.98 +/- 0.02). Dobutamine increased E(es) from 1.07 to 2.00 mmHg/ml and E(es)/E(a) from 1.64 to 2.49, and propranolol decreased E(es)/E(a) from 1.64 to 0.91 (all P < 0.05). After adrenergic blockade, preload reduction did not affect E(es), whereas hypoxia and arterial constriction markedly increased E(a) and somewhat increased E(es) due to the Anrep effect. Low preload did not affect E(es)/E(a) and high afterload decreased E(es)/E(a). In conclusion, in the right ventricle 1) P(max) can be calculated from normal beats, 2) P(max) can be used to determine ESPVR without change in load, and 3) P(max)-derived ESPVR can be used to assess ventricular contractility and ventricular-arterial coupling efficiency.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Eur Respir J
                Eur. Respir. J
                ERJ
                erj
                The European Respiratory Journal
                European Respiratory Society
                0903-1936
                1399-3003
                August 2017
                24 August 2017
                : 50
                : 2
                : 1700764
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Translational and Regenerative Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
                [2 ]Division of Cardiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
                [3 ]BIO5 Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
                [4 ]Vascular Medicine Institute, Heart and Vascular Institute, and Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
                [5 ]Department of Medicine, Wayne State University, and Section of Cardiology, John D. Dingell VA Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA
                [6 ]Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep, and Allergy Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
                [7 ]Laboratory of Physiology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
                Author notes
                Franz P. Rischard, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, Dept of Translational and Regenerative Medicine, 1501 N. Campbell Ave. Tucson, AZ 85724, USA. E-mail: frischard@ 123456deptofmed.arizona.edu
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3080-3675
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6861-8304
                Article
                ERJ-00764-2017
                10.1183/13993003.00764-2017
                5593378
                28838981
                0c4f0f18-52ac-40a3-a8bf-b47fa02f0a1a
                Copyright ©ERS 2017
                History
                : 24 February 2017
                : 29 May 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: United Therapeutics Corporation http://doi.org/10.13039/100007150
                Award ID: N/A
                Funded by: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute http://doi.org/10.13039/100000050
                Award ID: HL125208-01
                Categories
                Agora
                Research Letters
                7

                Respiratory medicine
                Respiratory medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article