Preconcentration and detection of the phosphorylated forms of cardiac troponin I in a cascade microchip by cationic isotachophoresis

Evaluation of patients with acute chest pain in emergency rooms is time-consuming and expensive, and it often results in uncertain diagnoses. We prospectively investigated the usefulness of bedside tests for the detection of cardiac troponin T and troponin I in the evaluation of patients with acute chest pain. In 773 consecutive patients who had had acute chest pain for less than 12 hours without ST-segment elevation on their electrocardiograms, troponin T and troponin I status (positive or negative) was determined at least twice by sensitive, qualitative bedside tests based on the use of specific monoclonal antibodies. Testing was performed on arrival and four or more hours later so that one sample was taken at least six hours after the onset of pain. The troponin T results were made available to the treating physicians. Troponin T tests were positive in 123 patients (16 percent), and troponin I tests were positive in 171 patients (22 percent). Among 47 patients with evolving myocardial infarction, troponin T tests were positive in 44 (94 percent) and troponin I tests were positive in all 47. Among 315 patients with unstable angina, troponin T tests were positive in 70 patients (22 percent), and troponin I tests were positive in 114 patients (36 percent). During 30 days of follow-up, there were 20 deaths and 14 nonfatal myocardial infarctions. Troponin T and troponin I proved to be strong, independent predictors of cardiac events. The event rates in patients with negative tests were only 1.1 percent for troponin T and 0.3 percent for troponin I. Bedside tests for cardiac-specific troponins are highly sensitive for the early detection of myocardial-cell injury in acute coronary syndromes. Negative test results are associated with low risk and allow rapid and safe discharge of patients with an episode of acute chest pain from the emergency room.

We made quantitative measurements of phosphorylation in troponin isolated from 6 non-failing donor hearts and 6 explanted hearts with end-stage heart failure in SDS-PAGE gels using Pro-Q Diamond phosphoprotein stain. The troponin T phosphorylation level was the same in troponin from failing and non-failing heart (3.1 mol Pi/mol). However, troponin I phosphorylation was significantly lower in failing (0.37+/-0.18 mol Pi/mol) compared with non-failing heart troponin (2.25+/-0.36 mol Pi/mol). Levels of troponin I PKA-dependent phosphorylation, measured with a phosphoserine 23/24-specific antibody, were also significantly lower in failing heart troponin (0.19+/-0.06 mol Pi/mol) compared to non-failing troponin (1.14+/-0.09 mol Pi/mol). We calculate that there is phosphorylation in addition to serine 23/24 of 1.11+/-0.34 mol Pi/mol in non-failing reduced to 0.18+/-0.17 mol Pi/mol in failing heart troponin, attributed to phosphorylation on the PKC sites. To test for the functional role of troponin I phosphorylation, the native troponin I from either non-failing or failing heart troponin was exchanged for a recombinant (unphosphorylated) human cardiac troponin I. Thin filament Ca(2+)-regulatory function was studied with the quantitative in vitro motility assay: thin filaments containing the replaced troponin I resulted in a failing phenotype of a 17-26% reduced sliding speed and an increased Ca(2+)-sensitivity relative to non-failing troponin (EC(50) TnI-exchanged/non-failing=0.57, p<0.001). When exchanged with troponin I phosphorylated with PKA motility parameters reverted to a pattern indistinguishable from non-failing troponin (p=0.35-0.75). We suggest that changes in troponin function can account for the contractile abnormality in failing heart muscle and that the functional changes in troponin are due to reduced phosphorylation of troponin I at the PKA sites.

This review addresses myocardial infarctions that escape clinical recognition. It focuses on the prevalence, predisposing factors, and prognosis of these unrecognized infarctions, and incorporates data from relevant epidemiologic studies, basic science investigations, and review articles. These data indicate that at least one fourth of all myocardial infarctions are clinically unrecognized. The demographic characteristics and coronary risk factor profiles of persons with previously unrecognized myocardial infarctions appear to be similar to those of persons whose infarctions are clinically detected. Impaired symptom perception may contribute to lack of recognition, but both patients' and physicians' perceptions about the risk for myocardial infarction may also play an important role. Finally, mortality rates after unrecognized and recognized myocardial infarction are similar. Given the public health implications of unrecognized myocardial infarction, future studies should address screening strategies, risk stratification after detection of previously unrecognized myocardial infarction, and the role of standard postinfarction therapies in affected patients.