Adenocarcinoma is the most common histologic type of lung cancer. To address advances
in oncology, molecular biology, pathology, radiology, and surgery of lung adenocarcinoma,
an international multidisciplinary classification was sponsored by the International
Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, American Thoracic Society, and European
Respiratory Society. This new adenocarcinoma classification is needed to provide uniform
terminology and diagnostic criteria, especially for bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC),
the overall approach to small nonresection cancer specimens, and for multidisciplinary
strategic management of tissue for molecular and immunohistochemical studies.
An international core panel of experts representing all three societies was formed
with oncologists/pulmonologists, pathologists, radiologists, molecular biologists,
and thoracic surgeons. A systematic review was performed under the guidance of the
American Thoracic Society Documents Development and Implementation Committee. The
search strategy identified 11,368 citations of which 312 articles met specified eligibility
criteria and were retrieved for full text review. A series of meetings were held to
discuss the development of the new classification, to develop the recommendations,
and to write the current document. Recommendations for key questions were graded by
strength and quality of the evidence according to the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment,
Development, and Evaluation approach.
The classification addresses both resection specimens, and small biopsies and cytology.
The terms BAC and mixed subtype adenocarcinoma are no longer used. For resection specimens,
new concepts are introduced such as adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and minimally invasive
adenocarcinoma (MIA) for small solitary adenocarcinomas with either pure lepidic growth
(AIS) or predominant lepidic growth with ≤ 5 mm invasion (MIA) to define patients
who, if they undergo complete resection, will have 100% or near 100% disease-specific
survival, respectively. AIS and MIA are usually nonmucinous but rarely may be mucinous.
Invasive adenocarcinomas are classified by predominant pattern after using comprehensive
histologic subtyping with lepidic (formerly most mixed subtype tumors with nonmucinous
BAC), acinar, papillary, and solid patterns; micropapillary is added as a new histologic
subtype. Variants include invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (formerly mucinous BAC),
colloid, fetal, and enteric adenocarcinoma. This classification provides guidance
for small biopsies and cytology specimens, as approximately 70% of lung cancers are
diagnosed in such samples. Non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs), in patients with
advanced-stage disease, are to be classified into more specific types such as adenocarcinoma
or squamous cell carcinoma, whenever possible for several reasons: (1) adenocarcinoma
or NSCLC not otherwise specified should be tested for epidermal growth factor receptor
(EGFR) mutations as the presence of these mutations is predictive of responsiveness
to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, (2) adenocarcinoma histology is a strong predictor
for improved outcome with pemetrexed therapy compared with squamous cell carcinoma,
and (3) potential life-threatening hemorrhage may occur in patients with squamous
cell carcinoma who receive bevacizumab. If the tumor cannot be classified based on
light microscopy alone, special studies such as immunohistochemistry and/or mucin
stains should be applied to classify the tumor further. Use of the term NSCLC not
otherwise specified should be minimized.
This new classification strategy is based on a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis
of lung adenocarcinoma that incorporates clinical, molecular, radiologic, and surgical
issues, but it is primarily based on histology. This classification is intended to
support clinical practice, and research investigation and clinical trials. As EGFR
mutation is a validated predictive marker for response and progression-free survival
with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced lung adenocarcinoma, we recommend
that patients with advanced adenocarcinomas be tested for EGFR mutation. This has
implications for strategic management of tissue, particularly for small biopsies and
cytology samples, to maximize high-quality tissue available for molecular studies.
Potential impact for tumor, node, and metastasis staging include adjustment of the
size T factor according to only the invasive component (1) pathologically in invasive
tumors with lepidic areas or (2) radiologically by measuring the solid component of
part-solid nodules.