18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparison Study of Computational Prediction Tools for Drug-Target Binding Affinities

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The drug development is generally arduous, costly, and success rates are low. Thus, the identification of drug-target interactions (DTIs) has become a crucial step in early stages of drug discovery. Consequently, developing computational approaches capable of identifying potential DTIs with minimum error rate are increasingly being pursued. These computational approaches aim to narrow down the search space for novel DTIs and shed light on drug functioning context. Most methods developed to date use binary classification to predict if the interaction between a drug and its target exists or not. However, it is more informative but also more challenging to predict the strength of the binding between a drug and its target. If that strength is not sufficiently strong, such DTI may not be useful. Therefore, the methods developed to predict drug-target binding affinities (DTBA) are of great value. In this study, we provide a comprehensive overview of the existing methods that predict DTBA. We focus on the methods developed using artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and deep learning (DL) approaches, as well as related benchmark datasets and databases. Furthermore, guidance and recommendations are provided that cover the gaps and directions of the upcoming work in this research area. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive comparison analysis of tools focused on DTBA with reference to AI/ML/DL.

          Related collections

          Most cited references132

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? – Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature

          Both the root mean square error (RMSE) and the mean absolute error (MAE) are regularly employed in model evaluation studies. Willmott and Matsuura (2005) have suggested that the RMSE is not a good indicator of average model performance and might be a misleading indicator of average error, and thus the MAE would be a better metric for that purpose. While some concerns over using RMSE raised by Willmott and Matsuura (2005) and Willmott et al. (2009) are valid, the proposed avoidance of RMSE in favor of MAE is not the solution. Citing the aforementioned papers, many researchers chose MAE over RMSE to present their model evaluation statistics when presenting or adding the RMSE measures could be more beneficial. In this technical note, we demonstrate that the RMSE is not ambiguous in its meaning, contrary to what was claimed by Willmott et al. (2009). The RMSE is more appropriate to represent model performance than the MAE when the error distribution is expected to be Gaussian. In addition, we show that the RMSE satisfies the triangle inequality requirement for a distance metric, whereas Willmott et al. (2009) indicated that the sums-of-squares-based statistics do not satisfy this rule. In the end, we discussed some circumstances where using the RMSE will be more beneficial. However, we do not contend that the RMSE is superior over the MAE. Instead, a combination of metrics, including but certainly not limited to RMSEs and MAEs, are often required to assess model performance.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A survey of deep neural network architectures and their applications

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              node2vec

              Prediction tasks over nodes and edges in networks require careful effort in engineering features used by learning algorithms. Recent research in the broader field of representation learning has led to significant progress in automating prediction by learning the features themselves. However, present feature learning approaches are not expressive enough to capture the diversity of connectivity patterns observed in networks. Here we propose node2vec, an algorithmic framework for learning continuous feature representations for nodes in networks. In node2vec, we learn a mapping of nodes to a low-dimensional space of features that maximizes the likelihood of preserving network neighborhoods of nodes. We define a flexible notion of a node's network neighborhood and design a biased random walk procedure, which efficiently explores diverse neighborhoods. Our algorithm generalizes prior work which is based on rigid notions of network neighborhoods, and we argue that the added flexibility in exploring neighborhoods is the key to learning richer representations. We demonstrate the efficacy of node2vec over existing state-of-the-art techniques on multi-label classification and link prediction in several real-world networks from diverse domains. Taken together, our work represents a new way for efficiently learning state-of-the-art task-independent representations in complex networks.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Chem
                Front Chem
                Front. Chem.
                Frontiers in Chemistry
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-2646
                20 November 2019
                2019
                : 7
                : 782
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Science and Engineering (CEMSE) Division, Computational Bioscience Research Center (CBRC), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) , Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
                [2] 2College of Computers and Information Technology, Taif University , Taif, Saudi Arabia
                [3] 3Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University , Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
                Author notes

                Edited by: Jose L. Medina-Franco, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico

                Reviewed by: Julio Caballero, University of Talca, Chile; Humbert Gonzalez-Diaz, University of the Basque Country, Spain; Simone Brogi, University of Pisa, Italy; Giulia Chemi, University of Siena, Siena, Italy, in collaboration with reviewer SB

                *Correspondence: Vladimir B. Bajic vladimir.bajic@ 123456kaust.edu.sa

                This article was submitted to Medicinal and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, a section of the journal Frontiers in Chemistry

                Article
                10.3389/fchem.2019.00782
                6879652
                31824921
                0c7cb87f-0c1a-4a2a-8550-7e0c3262fe65
                Copyright © 2019 Thafar, Raies, Albaradei, Essack and Bajic.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 09 August 2019
                : 30 October 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 4, Equations: 17, References: 171, Pages: 19, Words: 15886
                Funding
                Funded by: King Abdullah University of Science and Technology 10.13039/501100004052
                Award ID: BAS/1/1606-01-01
                Award ID: FCC/1/1976-24-01
                Categories
                Chemistry
                Review

                drug repurposing,drug-target interaction,drug-target binding affinity,artificial intelligence,machine learning,deep learning,information integration,bioinformatics

                Comments

                Comment on this article