2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Approaches to integrating genetic data into ecological networks

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          As molecular tools for assessing trophic interactions become common, research is increasingly focused on the construction of interaction networks. Here, we demonstrate three key methods for incorporating DNA data into network ecology and discuss analytical considerations using a model consisting of plants, insects, bats and their parasites from the Costa Rica dry forest. The simplest method involves the use of Sanger sequencing to acquire long sequences to validate or refine field identifications, for example of bats and their parasites, where one specimen yields one sequence and one identification. This method can be fully quantified and resolved and these data resemble traditional ecological networks. For more complex taxonomic identifications, we target multiple DNA loci, for example from a seed or fruit pulp sample in faeces. These networks are also well resolved but gene targets vary in resolution and quantification is difficult. Finally, for mixed templates such as faecal contents of insectivorous bats, we use DNA metabarcoding targeting two sequence lengths (157 and 407 bp) of one gene region and a MOTU, BLAST and BIN association approach to resolve nodes. This network type is complex to generate and analyse, and we discuss the implications of this type of resolution on network analysis. Using these data, we construct the first molecular-based network of networks containing 3,304 interactions between 762 nodes of eight trophic functions and involving parasitic, mutualistic and predatory interactions. We provide a comparison of the relative strengths and weaknesses of these data types in network ecology.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Molecular Ecology
          Mol Ecol
          Wiley
          0962-1083
          1365-294X
          May 03 2018
          January 2019
          December 10 2018
          January 2019
          : 28
          : 2
          : 503-519
          Affiliations
          [1 ]School of Biological and Chemical Sciences Queen Mary University of London London UK
          [2 ]Centre for Biodiversity Genomics University of Guelph Guelph Ontario Canada
          [3 ]The ArboretumUniversity of GuelphGuelphOntario Canada
          [4 ]Wellcome‐MRC Cambridge Stem Cell InstituteUniversity of Cambridge Cambridge UK
          [5 ]Department of Biology Texas A&M University College Station Texas
          [6 ]Center for Environmental Science University of Maryland Frostburg Maryland
          [7 ]Department of Integrative Biology University of Guelph Guelph Ontario Canada
          [8 ]Department of Biology University of Western Ontario London Ontario Canada
          Article
          10.1111/mec.14941
          30427082
          0c8910c4-47c8-409c-a446-1bddd179be6a
          © 2019

          http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

          http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article