8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A simple prediction algorithm for bacteraemia in patients with acute febrile illness.

      QJM: An International Journal of Medicine
      Sensitivity and Specificity, Acute Disease, Humans, Seizures, Febrile, Algorithms, diagnosis, Aged, Bacteremia, Predictive Value of Tests, complications, Aged, 80 and over, Risk Factors, Adult, Middle Aged, Adolescent, Female, Male

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Existing prediction models for the risk of bacteraemia are complex and difficult to use. Physicians are likely to use a model only if it is simple and sensitive. To develop a simple classification algorithm predicting the risk of bacteraemia. Hospital-based study. We enrolled 526 adult consecutive patients with acute febrile illness (40 with bacteraemia) presenting to the emergency department at a community hospital in Okinawa, Japan. Recursive partitioning analysis was used to build the classification algorithm with V-fold cross-validation. We used two clinical scenarios: in the first, laboratory tests were not available; in the second, they were. The two prediction algorithms generated three different risk groups for bacteraemia. In the first scenario, the important variables were chills, pulse, and physician diagnosis of a low-risk site. The low-risk group from this first algorithm included 68% of the total patients; sensitivity was 87.5% and the misclassification rate was 1.4% (5/358). In the second scenario, the important variables were chills, C-reactive protein, and physician diagnosis of a low-risk site. The low-risk group for the second algorithm included 62% of the total patients; sensitivity was 92.5% and misclassification rate 0.9% (3/328). The algorithms had negative predictive values of 98.6% (first scenario) and 99.1% (second). This simple and sensitive prediction algorithm may be useful for identifying patients at low risk of bacteraemia. Prospective validation is needed in other settings.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article