For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
21
views
21
references
 Top references
cited by
7
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      214
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Outcomes of descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty using imported donor corneas

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The lack of development of local donor tissue acquisition in several regions of the world has resulted in the necessity of performing keratoplasty with imported donor corneas. The greatest concern about the use of donor corneas supplied by foreign eye banks is the effect of the increased donor death-to-operation time which inevitably occurs during the tissue recovery, tissue processing, and tissue transfer between the countries. The purpose of this study was to report the outcomes of descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) using imported donor corneas.

          Methods

          This retrospective, non-comparative case series investigated the outcomes of the 102 consecutive DSAEK procedures using imported donor corneas performed at a single university-based hospital between August 2006–2014. The main outcome measures were postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell density (ECD), and complications.

          Results

          The mean death-to-operation time was 9.52 ± 1.48 days (range, 8–13). The mean preoperative ECD was 2761 ± 285 cells/mm 2. Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy was the predominant indication for grafting. The mean follow-up duration was 65.3 months. Ninety-three eyes had improved vision postoperatively (91.18%). BCVA unchanged in 3 eyes due to preexisting macular scar and advanced glaucoma. Primary graft failure occurred in 6 eyes (5.88%). Of the 93 eyes with improved BCVA, 100% had their best corrected vision within the first 1 year. The mean ECD at 6, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months after surgery was 1762 ± 294 cells/mm 2, 1681 ± 284 cells/mm 2, 1579 ± 209 cells/mm 2, 1389 ± 273 cells/mm 2, and 1251 ± 264 cells/mm 2 respectively. The mean ECD loss at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, and 5 years after surgery was 36.2%, 39.1%, 42.8%, 49.7%, and 54.7% respectively. The most common complication was graft detachment/dislocation (10.78%). There were no cases of any postoperative infection.

          Conclusions

          DSAEK with imported donor corneas provides rapid and good visual rehabilitation. The percentages of endothelial cell loss were comparable to those achieved in Western series using domestic corneas in which fresher tissues were available for transplantation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty: safety and outcomes: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

          W Barry Lee, Deborah S Jacobs, David Musch … (2009)
          To review the published literature on safety and outcomes of Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) for the surgical treatment of endothelial diseases of the cornea. Peer-reviewed literature searches were conducted in PubMed and the Cochrane Library with the most recent search in February 2009. The searches yielded 2118 citations in English-language journals. The abstracts of these articles were reviewed and 131 articles were selected for possible clinical relevance, of which 34 were determined to be relevant to the assessment objectives. The most common complications from DSEK among reviewed reports included posterior graft dislocations (mean, 14%; range, 0%-82%), followed by endothelial graft rejection (mean, 10%; range, 0%-45%), primary graft failure (mean, 5%; range, 0%-29%), and iatrogenic glaucoma (mean, 3%; range, 0%-15%). Average endothelial cell loss as measured by specular microscopy ranged from 25% to 54%, with an average cell loss of 37% at 6 months, and from 24% to 61%, with an average cell loss of 42% at 12 months. The average best-corrected Snellen visual acuity (mean, 9 months; range, 3-21 months) ranged from 20/34 to 20/66. A review of postoperative refractive results found induced hyperopia ranging from 0.7 to 1.5 diopters (D; mean, 1.1 D), with minimal induced astigmatism ranging from -0.4 to 0.6 D and a mean refractive shift of 0.11 D. A review of graft survival found that clear grafts at 1 year ranged from 55% to 100% (mean, 94%). The evidence reviewed is supportive of DSEK being a safe and effective treatment for endothelial diseases of the cornea. In terms of surgical risks, complication rates, graft survival (clarity), visual acuity, and endothelial cell loss, DSEK appears similar to penetrating keratoplasty (PK). It seems to be superior to PK in terms of earlier visual recovery, refractive stability, postoperative refractive outcomes, wound and suture-related complications, and intraoperative and late suprachoroidal hemorrhage risk. The most common complications of DSEK do not appear to be detrimental to the ultimate vision recovery in most cases. Long-term endothelial cell survival and the risk of late endothelial rejection are beyond the scope of this assessment. Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
          Article 0 comments Cited 137 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty five-year graft survival and endothelial cell loss.

            Jacqueline Price, Tulin O. Price, Leo S. Price … (2011)
            To assess 5-year Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) graft survival and endothelial cell loss in the surviving grafts. Retrospective, interventional case series. One hundred sixty-five eyes of 149 patients treated with primary DSEK. Donor corneal-scleral rims were dissected manually or with a microkeratome and were cut with a trephine. The graft was folded endothelial side inward and was inserted with forceps through a 5-mm incision. The cumulative probability of secondary graft failure was calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the log-rank test. Endothelial cell density (ECD) was determined from baseline preoperative donor and 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year postoperative central endothelial images. Graft survival and ECD at 5 years. The median recipient age was 71 years (range, 22-90 years) and 62% were female. Eighteen eyes (11%) were treated for pseudophakic or aphakic corneal edema and 147 eyes (89%) were treated for Fuchs' dystrophy. The cumulative 5-year survival rate was significantly lower in pseudophakic or aphakic corneal edema eyes (76%) versus Fuchs' eyes (95%; P = 0.0087). In particular, the 5-year survival rate was reduced significantly in eyes with prior glaucoma shunt or trabeculectomy surgery vs. those without (40% vs. 95%; P<0.0001). The causes of secondary graft failure were endothelial decompensation in 6 eyes (3.6%) and unsatisfactory corrected distance acuity (20/60 to 20/100) in 4 eyes (2.4%). No grafts experienced traumatic wound rupture or failed as a result of ocular surface complications. The median 5-year endothelial cell loss was 53% (range, 7.5%-89%). The 5-year graft ECD was correlated weakly with the baseline donor ECD (r = 0.22 and P = 0.04) and was not significantly correlated with recipient gender (P = 0.075), age (P = 0.85), or diagnosis (P = 0.78). The 5-year graft survival rates for DSEK were similar to those reported for penetrating keratoplasty in the multicenter Cornea Donor Study (95% vs. 93% for Fuchs' dystrophy and 76% vs. 73% for pseudophakic or aphakic corneal edema). Furthermore, the 5-year endothelial cell loss after DSEK compared favorably with that measured after penetrating keratoplasty in the Cornea Donor Study (53% vs. 70%). Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Article 0 comments Cited 54 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty outcomes compared with penetrating keratoplasty from the Cornea Donor Study.

              Marianne Price, Mark Gorovoy, Beth Benetz … (2010)
              To assess outcomes 1 year after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in comparison with penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) from the Specular Microscopy Ancillary Study (SMAS) of the Cornea Donor Study. Multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial. A total of 173 subjects undergoing DSAEK for a moderate risk condition (principally Fuchs' dystrophy or pseudophakic/aphakic corneal edema) compared with 410 subjects undergoing PKP from the SMAS who had clear grafts with at least 1 postoperative specular image within a 15-month follow-up period. The DSAEK procedures were performed by 2 experienced surgeons per their individual techniques, using the same donor and similar recipient criteria as for the PKP procedures in the SMAS performed by 68 surgeons at 45 sites, with donors provided from 31 eye banks. Graft success and complications for the DSAEK group were assessed and compared with the SMAS group. Endothelial cell density (ECD) was determined from baseline donor, 6-month (range, 5-7 months), and 12-month (range, 9-15 months) postoperative central endothelial images by the same reading center used in the SMAS. Endothelial cell density and graft survival at 1 year. Although the DSAEK recipient group criteria were similar to the PKP group, Fuchs' dystrophy was more prevalent in the DSAEK group (85% vs. 64%) and pseudophakic corneal edema was less prevalent (13% vs. 32%, P<0.001). The regraft rate within 15 months was 2.3% (DSAEK group) and 1.3% (PKP group) (P = 0.50). Percent endothelial cell loss was 34+/-22% versus 11+/-20% (6 months) and 38+/-22% versus 20+/-23% (12 months) in the DSAEK and PKP groups, respectively (both P<0.001). Preoperative diagnosis affected endothelial cell loss over time; in the PKP group, the subjects with pseudophakic/aphakic corneal edema experienced significantly higher 12-month cell loss than the subjects with Fuchs' dystrophy (28% vs. 16%, P = 0.01), whereas in the DSAEK group, the 12-month cell loss was comparable for the 2 diagnoses (41% vs. 37%, P = 0.59). One year post-transplantation, overall graft success was comparable for DSAEK and PKP procedures and endothelial cell loss was higher with DSAEK. Copyright 2010 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Article 0 comments Cited 50 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Kaevalin Lekhanont:
                ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2292-4581
                662-201-1560 , lekhanont@yahoo.com
                Journal
                Journal ID (nlm-ta): BMC Ophthalmol
                Journal ID (iso-abbrev): BMC Ophthalmol
                Title: BMC Ophthalmology
                Publisher: BioMed Central (London )
                ISSN (Electronic): 1471-2415
                Publication date (Electronic): 5 April 2017
                Publication date PMC-release: 5 April 2017
                Publication date Collection: 2017
                Volume: 17
                Electronic Location Identifier: 41
                Affiliations
                Department of Ophthalmology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Rama VI Rd., Rajathevi, Bangkok, 10400 Thailand
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2292-4581
                Article
                Publisher ID: 436
                DOI: 10.1186/s12886-017-0436-0
                PMC ID: 5382393
                PubMed ID: 28381247
                SO-VID: 0ce58869-a602-4264-8aa9-1cba37849cdf
                Copyright © © The Author(s). 2017
                License:

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                Date received : 1 September 2016
                Date accepted : 31 March 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: SCG Foundation
                Categories
                Subject: Research Article
                Custom metadata
                issue-copyright-statement © The Author(s) 2017

                ScienceOpen disciplines: Ophthalmology & Optometry
                Keywords: descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty,outcomes,imported donor corneas
                Data availability:
                ScienceOpen disciplines: Ophthalmology & Optometry
                Keywords: descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty, outcomes, imported donor corneas

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content214

                See all similar

                Cited by7

                See all cited by

                Most referenced authors157

                See all reference authors