28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Animal Board Invited Review: Comparing conventional and organic livestock production systems on different aspects of sustainability

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To sustainably contribute to food security of a growing and richer world population, livestock production systems are challenged to increase production levels while reducing environmental impact, being economically viable, and socially responsible. Knowledge about the sustainability performance of current livestock production systems may help to formulate strategies for future systems. Our study provides a systematic overview of differences between conventional and organic livestock production systems on a broad range of sustainability aspects and animal species available in peer-reviewed literature. Systems were compared on economy, productivity, environmental impact, animal welfare and public health. The review was limited to dairy cattle, beef cattle, pigs, broilers and laying hens, and to Europe, North America and New Zealand. Results per indicators are presented as in the articles without performing additional calculations. Out of 4171 initial search hits, 179 articles were analysed. Studies varied widely in indicators, research design, sample size and location and context. Quite some studies used small samples. No study analysed all aspects of sustainability simultaneously. Conventional systems had lower labour requirements per unit product, lower income risk per animal, higher production per animal per time unit, higher reproduction numbers, lower feed conversion ratio, lower land use, generally lower acidification and eutrophication potential per unit product, equal or better udder health for cows and equal or lower microbiological contamination. Organic systems had higher income per animal or full time employee, lower impact on biodiversity, lower eutrophication and acidification potential per unit land, equal or lower likelihood of antibiotic resistance in bacteria and higher beneficial fatty acid levels in cow milk. For most sustainability aspects, sometimes conventional and sometimes organic systems performed better, except for productivity, which was consistently higher in conventional systems. For many aspects and animal species, more data are needed to conclude on a difference between organic and conventional livestock production systems.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Life cycle assessment of conventional and organic milk production in the Netherlands

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Life cycle assessment of milk production — a comparison of conventional and organic farming

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Global food supply: land use efficiency of livestock systems

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Animal
                Animal
                ANM
                Animal
                Cambridge University Press (Cambridge, UK )
                1751-7311
                1751-732X
                31 May 2017
                October 2017
                : 11
                : 10
                : 1839-1851
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Wageningen Economic Research , PO-box 29703, 2502LS Den Haag, The Netherlands
                [2 ] Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen Livestock Research , PO-box 338, 6700AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
                [3 ] Business Economics Group, Wageningen University , PO-box 8130, 6700EW Wageningen, The Netherlands
                [4 ] Department of Animal Nutrition, Wageningen Livestock Research , PO-box 338, 6700AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
                [5 ] Animal Production Systems group, Wageningen University , PO-box 338, 6700AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
                [6 ] Behavioural Ecology Group, Wageningen University , PO-box 338, 6700AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
                Author notes
                Article
                S175173111700115X 00115
                10.1017/S175173111700115X
                5607874
                28558861
                0d2cca03-2c78-4ea2-894f-4b67eb0efe74
                © The Animal Consortium 2017

                This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 04 July 2016
                : 02 March 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 8, Pages: 13
                Categories
                Review Article
                Farming Systems and Environment

                Animal science & Zoology
                livestock production system,sustainability,literature review,conventional,organic

                Comments

                Comment on this article