49
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Machine learning for detection and diagnosis of disease.

      1
      Annual review of biomedical engineering
      Annual Reviews

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Machine learning offers a principled approach for developing sophisticated, automatic, and objective algorithms for analysis of high-dimensional and multimodal biomedical data. This review focuses on several advances in the state of the art that have shown promise in improving detection, diagnosis, and therapeutic monitoring of disease. Key in the advancement has been the development of a more in-depth understanding and theoretical analysis of critical issues related to algorithmic construction and learning theory. These include trade-offs for maximizing generalization performance, use of physically realistic constraints, and incorporation of prior knowledge and uncertainty. The review describes recent developments in machine learning, focusing on supervised and unsupervised linear methods and Bayesian inference, which have made significant impacts in the detection and diagnosis of disease in biomedicine. We describe the different methodologies and, for each, provide examples of their application to specific domains in biomedical diagnostics.

          Related collections

          Most cited references68

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A comparison of methods for multiclass support vector machines.

          Support vector machines (SVMs) were originally designed for binary classification. How to effectively extend it for multiclass classification is still an ongoing research issue. Several methods have been proposed where typically we construct a multiclass classifier by combining several binary classifiers. Some authors also proposed methods that consider all classes at once. As it is computationally more expensive to solve multiclass problems, comparisons of these methods using large-scale problems have not been seriously conducted. Especially for methods solving multiclass SVM in one step, a much larger optimization problem is required so up to now experiments are limited to small data sets. In this paper we give decomposition implementations for two such "all-together" methods. We then compare their performance with three methods based on binary classifications: "one-against-all," "one-against-one," and directed acyclic graph SVM (DAGSVM). Our experiments indicate that the "one-against-one" and DAG methods are more suitable for practical use than the other methods. Results also show that for large problems methods by considering all data at once in general need fewer support vectors.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Molecular Classification of Cancer: Class Discovery and Class Prediction by Gene Expression Monitoring

            T. Golub (1999)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A blind source separation technique using second-order statistics

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Annu Rev Biomed Eng
                Annual review of biomedical engineering
                Annual Reviews
                1523-9829
                1523-9829
                2006
                : 8
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA. ps629@columbia.edu
                Article
                10.1146/annurev.bioeng.8.061505.095802
                16834566
                0d352e91-a9d0-4864-9994-8bb1664c855f
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article