182
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Assessing mental imagery in clinical psychology: A review of imagery measures and a guiding framework

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Mental imagery is an under-explored field in clinical psychology research but presents a topic of potential interest and relevance across many clinical disorders, including social phobia, schizophrenia, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder. There is currently a lack of a guiding framework from which clinicians may select the domains or associated measures most likely to be of appropriate use in mental imagery research. We adopt an interdisciplinary approach and present a review of studies across experimental psychology and clinical psychology in order to highlight the key domains and measures most likely to be of relevance. This includes a consideration of methods for experimentally assessing the generation, maintenance, inspection and transformation of mental images; as well as subjective measures of characteristics such as image vividness and clarity. We present a guiding framework in which we propose that cognitive, subjective and clinical aspects of imagery should be explored in future research. The guiding framework aims to assist researchers in the selection of measures for assessing those aspects of mental imagery that are of most relevance to clinical psychology. We propose that a greater understanding of the role of mental imagery in clinical disorders will help drive forward advances in both theory and treatment.

          Highlights

          ► Mental imagery is of potential interest and relevance across clinical disorders. ► We highlight the key domains and measures for assessing mental imagery. ► We propose a guiding framework for the selection of measures in clinical research. ► Exploring mental imagery will help drive forward advances in theory and treatment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references257

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision.

          Our ability to remember what we have seen is very limited. Most current views characterize this limit as a fixed number of items-only four objects-that can be held in visual working memory. We show that visual memory capacity is not fixed by the number of objects, but rather is a limited resource that is shared out dynamically between all items in the visual scene. This resource can be shifted flexibly between objects, with allocation biased by selective attention and toward targets of upcoming eye movements. The proportion of resources allocated to each item determines the precision with which it is remembered, a relation that we show is governed by a simple power law, allowing quantitative estimates of resource distribution in a scene.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A dual representation theory of posttraumatic stress disorder.

              A cognitive theory of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is proposed that assumes traumas experienced after early childhood give rise to 2 sorts of memory, 1 verbally accessible and 1 automatically accessible through appropriate situational cues. These different types of memory are used to explain the complex phenomenology of PTSD, including the experiences of reliving the traumatic event and of emotionally processing the trauma. The theory considers 3 possible outcomes of the emotional processing of trauma, successful completion, chronic processing, and premature inhibition of processing We discuss the implications of the theory for research design, clinical practice, and resolving contradictions in the empirical data.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Clin Psychol Rev
                Clin Psychol Rev
                Clinical Psychology Review
                Elsevier Science Inc
                0272-7358
                1873-7811
                February 2013
                February 2013
                : 33
                : 1
                : 1-23
                Affiliations
                [a ]School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, UK
                [b ]School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, UK
                [c ]MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences, Cambridge, UK
                [d ]Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, UK
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3FX, UK. Tel.: + 44 1224 273940; fax: + 44 1224 273426. d.g.pearson@ 123456abdn.ac.uk
                Article
                CPR1256
                10.1016/j.cpr.2012.09.001
                3545187
                23123567
                0d5458f4-ed49-4cd0-8a05-3dc10c768c60
                © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.

                This document may be redistributed and reused, subject to certain conditions.

                History
                : 22 February 2012
                : 13 July 2012
                : 4 September 2012
                Categories
                Article

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                mental imagery,working memory,psychopathology,autobiographical memory,psychological assessment

                Comments

                Comment on this article