144
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Computer-Aided Surgery Does Not Increase the Accuracy of Dorsal Pedicle Screw Placement in the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine: A Retrospective Analysis of 2,003 Pedicle Screws in a Level I Trauma Center

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Study Design A retrospective analysis of a prospective database.

          Objective Meta-analyses suggest that computer-assisted systems can increase the accuracy of pedicle screw placement for dorsal spinal fusion procedures. The results of further meta-analyses report that in the thoracic spine, both the methods have comparable placement accuracy. These studies are limited due to an abundance of screw classification systems. The aim of this study was to assess the placement accuracy and potentially influencing factors of three-dimensionally navigated versus conventionally inserted pedicle screws.

          Methods This was a retrospective analysis of a prospective database at a level I trauma center of pedicle screw placement (computer-navigated versus traditionally placed) for dorsal spinal stabilizations. The cases spanned a 5.5-year study period (January 1, 2005, to June 30, 2010). The perforations of the pedicle were differentiated in three grades based on the postoperative computed tomography.

          Results The overall placement accuracy was 86% in the conventional group versus 79% in the computer-navigated group (grade 0). The computer-navigated procedures were superior in the lumbar spine and the conventional procedures were superior in the thoracic spine, but both failed to be of statistical significance. The level of experience of the performing surgeon and the patient's body mass index did not influence the placement accuracy. The only significant influence was the spinal segment: the higher the spinal level where the fusion was performed, the more likely the screw was displaced.

          Conclusions The computer-navigated and conventional methods are both safe procedures to place transpedicular screws at the traumatized thoracic and lumbar spine. At the moment, three-dimensionally based navigation does not significantly increase the placement accuracy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques.

            With the advances and improvement of computer-assisted surgery devices, computer-guided pedicle screws insertion has been applied to the lumbar, thoracic and cervical spine. The purpose of the present study was to perform a systematic review of all available prospective evidence regarding pedicle screw insertion techniques in the thoracic and lumbar human spine. We considered all prospective in vivo clinical studies in the English literature that assessed the results of different pedicle screw placement techniques (free-hand technique, fluoroscopy guided, computed tomography (CT)-based navigation, fluoro-based navigation). MEDLINE, OVID, and Springer databases were used for the literature search covering the period from January 1950 until May 2010. 26 prospective clinical studies were eventually included in the analysis. These studies included in total 1,105 patients in which 6,617 screws were inserted. In the studies using free-hand technique, the percentage of the screws fully contained in the pedicle ranged from 69 to 94%, with the aid of fluoroscopy from 28 to 85%, using CT navigation from 89 to 100% and using fluoroscopy-based navigation from 81 to 92%. The screws positioned with free-hand technique tended to perforate the cortex medially, whereas the screws placed with CT navigation guidance seemed to perforate more often laterally. In conclusion, navigation does indeed exhibit higher accuracy and increased safety in pedicle screw placement than free-hand technique and use of fluoroscopy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo.

              The accuracy of pedicular screw placement was assessed in 40 consecutive patients treated with the AO "Fixateur Interne." Postoperative CT scans were used to measure canal encroachment from the medial border of the pedicle, the angle of insertion and the point of entry. Eighty-one percent of the screws were placed within 2 mm of the medial border of the pedicle and 6% had 4-8 mm of canal encroachment with two patients developing minor neurological complications that spontaneously resolved. Four percent were inserted lateral to the pedicle. The parameters linked to satisfactory screw placement include entry point, angle of insertion and pedicular isthmus widths. Improvement in accuracy was noted in the latter 25% of screw insertions, reflecting the learning curve associated with this technique.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Global Spine J
                Global Spine J
                10.1055/s-00000177
                Global Spine Journal
                Georg Thieme Verlag KG (Stuttgart · New York )
                2192-5682
                2192-5690
                12 December 2014
                April 2015
                : 5
                : 2
                : 93-101
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centre for Orthopaedic Trauma and Spine Surgery, Donau-Ries Hospital Donauwörth, Donauwörth, Germany
                [2 ]Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
                [3 ]Ulm University, Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm, Germany
                [4 ]Ulm University, Institute of Research in Rehabilitation Medicine, Bad Buchau, Germany
                [5 ]Department of Trauma, Hand, and Reconstructive Surgery, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence PD Dr. med. Michael Kraus Centre for Orthopaedic Trauma and Spine Surgery Donau-Ries Hospital Donauwörth, Neudegger Allee 6, 86609 DonauwörthGermany kraus@ 123456email.de
                Article
                1400066
                10.1055/s-0034-1396430
                4369205
                25844281
                0d575f0b-ebc3-4fb2-b4b0-9d0df96616cc
                © Thieme Medical Publishers
                History
                : 14 May 2014
                : 21 October 2014
                Categories
                Article

                computer assisted pedicle screw placement,computer navigation,spine,pedicle screw,image based guidance

                Comments

                Comment on this article