1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Biodiversity targets after 2010 revisited

      Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines.

          In 2002, world leaders committed, through the Convention on Biological Diversity, to achieve a significant reduction in the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010. We compiled 31 indicators to report on progress toward this target. Most indicators of the state of biodiversity (covering species' population trends, extinction risk, habitat extent and condition, and community composition) showed declines, with no significant recent reductions in rate, whereas indicators of pressures on biodiversity (including resource consumption, invasive alien species, nitrogen pollution, overexploitation, and climate change impacts) showed increases. Despite some local successes and increasing responses (including extent and biodiversity coverage of protected areas, sustainable forest management, policy responses to invasive alien species, and biodiversity-related aid), the rate of biodiversity loss does not appear to be slowing.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife--threats to biodiversity and human health.

            Emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) of free-living wild animals can be classified into three major groups on the basis of key epizootiological criteria: (i) EIDs associated with "spill-over" from domestic animals to wildlife populations living in proximity; (ii) EIDs related directly to human intervention, via host or parasite translocations; and (iii) EIDs with no overt human or domestic animal involvement. These phenomena have two major biological implications: first, many wildlife species are reservoirs of pathogens that threaten domestic animal and human health; second, wildlife EIDs pose a substantial threat to the conservation of global biodiversity.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Aiming higher to bend the curve of biodiversity loss

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
                Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
                Elsevier BV
                18773435
                October 2020
                October 2020
                : 46
                : 46-47
                Article
                10.1016/j.cosust.2020.10.004
                0da98355-113a-4100-b8ed-035035099a7a
                © 2020

                https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article