4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Treatment fidelity in aphasia randomised controlled trials

      1 , 1 , 1
      Aphasiology
      Informa UK Limited

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke.

          Aphasia is an acquired language impairment following brain damage that affects some or all language modalities: expression and understanding of speech, reading, and writing. Approximately one third of people who have a stroke experience aphasia.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Top ten research priorities relating to life after stroke.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Evidence-based systematic review: effects of intensity of treatment and constraint-induced language therapy for individuals with stroke-induced aphasia.

              This systematic review summarizes evidence for intensity of treatment and constraint-induced language therapy (CILT) on measures of language impairment and communication activity/participation in individuals with stroke-induced aphasia. A systematic search of the aphasia literature using 15 electronic databases (e.g., PubMed, CINAHL) identified 10 studies meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria. A review panel evaluated studies for methodological quality. Studies were characterized by research stage (i.e., discovery, efficacy, effectiveness, cost-benefit/public policy research), and effect sizes (ESs) were calculated wherever possible. In chronic aphasia, studies provided modest evidence for more intensive treatment and the positive effects of CILT. In acute aphasia, 1 study evaluated high-intensity treatment positively; no studies examined CILT. Four studies reported discovery research, with quality scores ranging from 3 to 6 of 8 possible markers. Five treatment efficacy studies had quality scores ranging from 5 to 7 of 9 possible markers. One study of treatment effectiveness received a score of 4 of 8 possible markers. Although modest evidence exists for more intensive treatment and CILT for individuals with stroke-induced aphasia, the results of this review should be considered preliminary and, when making treatment decisions, should be used in conjunction with clinical expertise and the client's individual values.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Aphasiology
                Aphasiology
                Informa UK Limited
                0268-7038
                1464-5041
                April 11 2019
                July 03 2019
                February 06 2019
                July 03 2019
                : 33
                : 7
                : 759-779
                Affiliations
                [1 ] School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia
                Article
                10.1080/02687038.2019.1576442
                0ded5b77-464c-47a5-bf67-c4157eea255a
                © 2019
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article