27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Policy Dystopia Model: An Interpretive Analysis of Tobacco Industry Political Activity

      research-article
      1 , * , 2 , 1
      PLoS Medicine
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Tobacco industry interference has been identified as the greatest obstacle to the implementation of evidence-based measures to reduce tobacco use. Understanding and addressing industry interference in public health policy-making is therefore crucial. Existing conceptualisations of corporate political activity (CPA) are embedded in a business perspective and do not attend to CPA’s social and public health costs; most have not drawn on the unique resource represented by internal tobacco industry documents. Building on this literature, including systematic reviews, we develop a critically informed conceptual model of tobacco industry political activity.

          Methods and Findings

          We thematically analysed published papers included in two systematic reviews examining tobacco industry influence on taxation and marketing of tobacco; we included 45 of 46 papers in the former category and 20 of 48 papers in the latter ( n = 65). We used a grounded theory approach to build taxonomies of “discursive” (argument-based) and “instrumental” (action-based) industry strategies and from these devised the Policy Dystopia Model, which shows that the industry, working through different constituencies, constructs a metanarrative to argue that proposed policies will lead to a dysfunctional future of policy failure and widely dispersed adverse social and economic consequences. Simultaneously, it uses diverse, interlocking insider and outsider instrumental strategies to disseminate this narrative and enhance its persuasiveness in order to secure its preferred policy outcomes. Limitations are that many papers were historical (some dating back to the 1970s) and focused on high-income regions.

          Conclusions

          The model provides an evidence-based, accessible way of understanding diverse corporate political strategies. It should enable public health actors and officials to preempt these strategies and develop realistic assessments of the industry’s claims.

          Abstract

          In this thematic analysis, Selda Ulucanlar and colleagues develop taxonomies and an overall model to describe the political strategies used by the tobacco industry to influence policy around tobacco taxation and marketing.

          Author Summary

          Why Was This Study Done?
          • Interference by the tobacco industry in government policy-making is known to be an important reason for governments’ failure to adopt proven measures to reduce tobacco consumption.

          • Our study aimed to systematically review tobacco industry political activity from a critical societal perspective using in-depth empirical evidence.

          • We set out to build a widely applicable model that governments in different countries could use to identify and preempt industry interference in policy.

          What Did the Researchers Do and Find?
          • We analysed 65 papers included in previous systematic reviews that examined tobacco industry political activity in two policy areas: taxation and marketing of tobacco products.

          • Using constructivist grounded theory, we identified industry arguments and techniques and then grouped these under the more general heading of strategies, finally developing a taxonomy and model of tobacco industry political activity.

          • According to our Policy Dystopia Model, the industry produces an alarmist narrative that proposed policies will fail and lead to a great number of undesirable social and economic consequences (outlined in our taxonomy of discursive strategies).

          • The industry also uses different methods (outlined in our taxonomy of instrumental strategies) to disseminate this narrative and persuade decision-makers in order to block policies.

          What Do These Findings Mean?
          • Public health actors and policy-makers can use our model and taxonomies to better promote tobacco-related policies and to render ineffective tobacco industry opposition and political activity.

          • In particular, they need to pay attention to alliance formation, information provision, interdisciplinary working, and transparency in policy-making.

          Related collections

          Most cited references73

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment.

          High- and low-task-importance Ss read a strong or weak unambiguous message or an ambiguous message that was attributed to a high- or low-credibility source. Under low task importance, heuristic processing of the credibility cue was the sole determinant of Ss' attitudes, regardless of argument ambiguity or strength. When task importance was high and message content was unambiguous, systematic processing alone determined attitudes when this content contradicted the validity of the credibility heuristic; when message content did not contradict this heuristic, systematic and heuristic processing determined attitudes independently. Finally, when task importance was high and message content was ambiguous, heuristic and systematic processing again both influenced attitudes. Yet, source credibility affected persuasion partly through its impact on the valence of systematic processing, confirming that heuristic processing can bias systematic processing when evidence is ambiguous. Implications for persuasion and other social judgment phenomena are discussed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A Neo-Gramscian Approach to Corporate Political Strategy: Conflict and Accommodation in the Climate Change Negotiations*

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The vector of the tobacco epidemic: tobacco industry practices in low and middle-income countries.

              To understand transnational tobacco companies' (TTCs) practices in low and middle-income countries which serve to block tobacco-control policies and promote tobacco use. Systematic review of published research on tobacco industry activities to promote tobacco use and oppose tobacco-control policies in low and middle-income countries. TTCs' strategies used in low and middle-income countries followed four main themes-economic activity; marketing/promotion; political activity; and deceptive/manipulative activity. Economic activity, including foreign investment and smuggling, was used to enter new markets. Political activities included lobbying, offering voluntary self-regulatory codes, and mounting corporate social responsibility campaigns. Deceptive activities included manipulation of science and use of third-party allies to oppose smoke-free policies, delay other tobacco-control policies, and maintain support of policymakers and the public for a pro-tobacco industry policy environment. TTCs used tactics for marketing, advertising, and promoting their brands that were tailored to specific market environments. These activities included direct and indirect tactis, targeting particular populations, and introducing new tobacco products designed to limit marketing restrictions and taxes, maintain the social acceptability of tobacco use, and counter tobacco-control efforts. TTCs have used similar strategies in high-income countries as these being described in low and middle-income countries. As required by FCTC Article 5.3, to counter tobacco industry pressures and to implement effective tobacco-control policies, governments and health professionals in low and middle-income countries should fully understand TTCs practices and counter them.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Med
                PLoS Med
                plos
                plosmed
                PLoS Medicine
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1549-1277
                1549-1676
                20 September 2016
                September 2016
                : 13
                : 9
                : e1002125
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department for Health and UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies (UKCTAS), University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
                [2 ]School of Languages and Social Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom
                San Diego State University, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                • Analyzed the data: SU GJF ABG.

                • Wrote the first draft of the manuscript: SU.

                • Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: SU GJF ABG.

                • Agree with the manuscript’s results and conclusions: SU GJF ABG.

                • All authors have read and confirm that they meet ICMJE criteria for authorship.

                Article
                PMEDICINE-D-15-01565
                10.1371/journal.pmed.1002125
                5029800
                27649386
                0df8291e-33e5-4826-b80f-cae56659f09b
                © 2016 Ulucanlar et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 26 May 2015
                : 8 August 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 5, Pages: 21
                Funding
                Funded by: National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health
                Award ID: RO1CA160695
                Award Recipient :
                Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award number RO1CA160695 awarded to ABG. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Public and Occupational Health
                Tobacco Control
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Agriculture
                Crop Science
                Crops
                Tobacco
                Social Sciences
                Political Science
                Public Policy
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Public and Occupational Health
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Taxonomy
                Computer and Information Sciences
                Data Management
                Taxonomy
                Social Sciences
                Sociology
                Communications
                Marketing
                Social Sciences
                Sociology
                Social Policy
                Social Sciences
                Economics
                Finance
                Taxation
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article