11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Freshwater mussel conservation: A global horizon scan of emerging threats and opportunities

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We identified 14 emerging and poorly understood threats and opportunities for addressing the global conservation of freshwater mussels over the next decade. A panel of 17 researchers and stakeholders from six continents submitted a total of 56 topics that were ranked and prioritized using a consensus‐building Delphi technique. Our 14 priority topics fell into five broad themes (autecology, population dynamics, global stressors, global diversity, and ecosystem services) and included understanding diets throughout mussel life history; identifying the drivers of population declines; defining metrics for quantifying mussel health; assessing the role of predators, parasites, and disease; informed guidance on the risks and opportunities for captive breeding and translocations; the loss of mussel–fish co‐evolutionary relationships; assessing the effects of increasing surface water changes; understanding the effects of sand and aggregate mining; understanding the effects of drug pollution and other emerging contaminants such as nanomaterials; appreciating the threats and opportunities arising from river restoration; conserving understudied hotspots by building local capacity through the principles of decolonization; identifying appropriate taxonomic units for conservation; improved quantification of the ecosystem services provided by mussels; and understanding how many mussels are enough to provide these services. Solutions for addressing the topics ranged from ecological studies to technological advances and socio‐political engagement. Prioritization of our topics can help to drive a proactive approach to the conservation of this declining group which provides a multitude of important ecosystem services.

          Abstract

          We identified 14 emerging and poorly understood threats and opportunities for addressing the global conservation of freshwater mussels over the next decade. Prioritization of our topics can help to drive a proactive approach to the conservation of this declining group which provides a multitude of important ecosystem services.

          Related collections

          Most cited references162

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges.

          Freshwater biodiversity is the over-riding conservation priority during the International Decade for Action - 'Water for Life' - 2005 to 2015. Fresh water makes up only 0.01% of the World's water and approximately 0.8% of the Earth's surface, yet this tiny fraction of global water supports at least 100000 species out of approximately 1.8 million - almost 6% of all described species. Inland waters and freshwater biodiversity constitute a valuable natural resource, in economic, cultural, aesthetic, scientific and educational terms. Their conservation and management are critical to the interests of all humans, nations and governments. Yet this precious heritage is in crisis. Fresh waters are experiencing declines in biodiversity far greater than those in the most affected terrestrial ecosystems, and if trends in human demands for water remain unaltered and species losses continue at current rates, the opportunity to conserve much of the remaining biodiversity in fresh water will vanish before the 'Water for Life' decade ends in 2015. Why is this so, and what is being done about it? This article explores the special features of freshwater habitats and the biodiversity they support that makes them especially vulnerable to human activities. We document threats to global freshwater biodiversity under five headings: overexploitation; water pollution; flow modification; destruction or degradation of habitat; and invasion by exotic species. Their combined and interacting influences have resulted in population declines and range reduction of freshwater biodiversity worldwide. Conservation of biodiversity is complicated by the landscape position of rivers and wetlands as 'receivers' of land-use effluents, and the problems posed by endemism and thus non-substitutability. In addition, in many parts of the world, fresh water is subject to severe competition among multiple human stakeholders. Protection of freshwater biodiversity is perhaps the ultimate conservation challenge because it is influenced by the upstream drainage network, the surrounding land, the riparian zone, and - in the case of migrating aquatic fauna - downstream reaches. Such prerequisites are hardly ever met. Immediate action is needed where opportunities exist to set aside intact lake and river ecosystems within large protected areas. For most of the global land surface, trade-offs between conservation of freshwater biodiversity and human use of ecosystem goods and services are necessary. We advocate continuing attempts to check species loss but, in many situations, urge adoption of a compromise position of management for biodiversity conservation, ecosystem functioning and resilience, and human livelihoods in order to provide a viable long-term basis for freshwater conservation. Recognition of this need will require adoption of a new paradigm for biodiversity protection and freshwater ecosystem management - one that has been appropriately termed 'reconciliation ecology'.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity.

            Protecting the world's freshwater resources requires diagnosing threats over a broad range of scales, from global to local. Here we present the first worldwide synthesis to jointly consider human and biodiversity perspectives on water security using a spatial framework that quantifies multiple stressors and accounts for downstream impacts. We find that nearly 80% of the world's population is exposed to high levels of threat to water security. Massive investment in water technology enables rich nations to offset high stressor levels without remedying their underlying causes, whereas less wealthy nations remain vulnerable. A similar lack of precautionary investment jeopardizes biodiversity, with habitats associated with 65% of continental discharge classified as moderately to highly threatened. The cumulative threat framework offers a tool for prioritizing policy and management responses to this crisis, and underscores the necessity of limiting threats at their source instead of through costly remediation of symptoms in order to assure global water security for both humans and freshwater biodiversity.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              High-resolution mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes.

              The location and persistence of surface water (inland and coastal) is both affected by climate and human activity and affects climate, biological diversity and human wellbeing. Global data sets documenting surface water location and seasonality have been produced from inventories and national descriptions, statistical extrapolation of regional data and satellite imagery, but measuring long-term changes at high resolution remains a challenge. Here, using three million Landsat satellite images, we quantify changes in global surface water over the past 32 years at 30-metre resolution. We record the months and years when water was present, where occurrence changed and what form changes took in terms of seasonality and persistence. Between 1984 and 2015 permanent surface water has disappeared from an area of almost 90,000 square kilometres, roughly equivalent to that of Lake Superior, though new permanent bodies of surface water covering 184,000 square kilometres have formed elsewhere. All continental regions show a net increase in permanent water, except Oceania, which has a fractional (one per cent) net loss. Much of the increase is from reservoir filling, although climate change is also implicated. Loss is more geographically concentrated than gain. Over 70 per cent of global net permanent water loss occurred in the Middle East and Central Asia, linked to drought and human actions including river diversion or damming and unregulated withdrawal. Losses in Australia and the USA linked to long-term droughts are also evident. This globally consistent, validated data set shows that impacts of climate change and climate oscillations on surface water occurrence can be measured and that evidence can be gathered to show how surface water is altered by human activities. We anticipate that this freely available data will improve the modelling of surface forcing, provide evidence of state and change in wetland ecotones (the transition areas between biomes), and inform water-management decision-making.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                d.aldridge@zoo.cam.ac.uk
                Journal
                Glob Chang Biol
                Glob Chang Biol
                10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2486
                GCB
                Global Change Biology
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1354-1013
                1365-2486
                29 November 2022
                February 2023
                : 29
                : 3 ( doiID: 10.1111/gcb.v29.3 )
                : 575-589
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Aquatic Ecology Group, Department of Zoology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
                [ 2 ] N. Laverov Federal Center for Integrated Arctic Research of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences Arkhangelsk Russia
                [ 3 ] Northern Arctic Federal University Arkhangelsk Russia
                [ 4 ] Department of Zoology and Fisheries Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Prague Czech Republic
                [ 5 ] Aquatic Systems Biology Unit Technical University of Munich Freising Germany
                [ 6 ] Southern Research Station, Center for Bottomland Hardwoods Research U.S. Forest Service Frankfort Kentucky USA
                [ 7 ] Australian Rivers Institute Griffith University Nathan Queensland Australia
                [ 8 ] Department of Aquatic Zoology Western Australian Museum Welshpool Western Australian Australia
                [ 9 ] CIBIO/InBIO/BIOPOLIS—Research Center in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources University of Porto Vairão Portugal
                [ 10 ] Department of Freshwater Invertebrates Albany Museum Makhanda South Africa
                [ 11 ] Department of Zoology and Entomology Rhodes University Makhanda South Africa
                [ 12 ] CNR Water Research Institute Verbania Italy
                [ 13 ] CBMA—Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology, Department of Biology University of Minho Braga Portugal
                [ 14 ] Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies Millbrook New York USA
                [ 15 ] Graham Sustainability Institute University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA
                [ 16 ] Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia Santa Cruz (CONICET, UNPA, UTN), Unidad Académica San Julián Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral Santa Cruz Argentina
                [ 17 ] Oklahoma Biological Survey and Department of Biology University of Oklahoma Norman Oklahoma USA
                [ 18 ] Institute of Nature Conservation Polish Academy of Sciences Kraków Poland
                [ 19 ] School of Geography University of Nottingham Nottingham UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                David C. Aldridge, Aquatic Ecology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, The David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, UK.

                Email: d.aldridge@ 123456zoo.cam.ac.uk

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9067-8592
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5807-055X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9066-4833
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3878-4192
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7778-5147
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7698-3443
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8742-8381
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4141-7788
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2761-7962
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7624-5686
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5297-3387
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5961-5515
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6767-4486
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2118-0739
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3749-836X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2048-9205
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0305-8270
                Article
                GCB16510 GCB-22-1509.R1
                10.1111/gcb.16510
                10100069
                36444494
                0e118b9c-281b-46a7-8c5e-1481d255e29b
                © 2022 The Authors. Global Change Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 27 September 2022
                : 07 July 2022
                : 15 October 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 0, Pages: 15, Words: 13448
                Funding
                Funded by: Australian National Environmental Science Foundation
                Funded by: Czech Science Foundation , doi 10.13039/501100001824;
                Award ID: 19‐05510S
                Funded by: European Cooperation in Science and Technology , doi 10.13039/501100000921;
                Award ID: CA18239
                Funded by: Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia , doi 10.13039/501100001871;
                Award ID: 2020.03608.CEECIND
                Funded by: Russian Science Foundation , doi 10.13039/501100006769;
                Award ID: 21‐14‐00092
                Award ID: 21‐17‐00126
                Funded by: Corpus Christi College , doi 10.13039/501100000591;
                Funded by: IOP PAN
                Categories
                Review
                Review
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                February 2023
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.7 mode:remove_FC converted:13.04.2023

                conservation,diversity,ecosystem services,freshwater mussel,horizon scan,mussel health,threats,unionid

                Comments

                Comment on this article