10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Urgent Pericardiocentesis Is More Frequently Needed After Left Circumflex Coronary Artery Perforation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Coronary artery perforation (CAP) is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) due to the risk of cardiac tamponade. Strikingly, in contrast to numerous analyses of CAP predictors, only few studies were focused on the predictors of tamponade after PCI, once iatrogenic CAP has occurred. Our aim was to search for clinical and periprocedural characteristics, including the coronary artery involved, associated with the development of acute cardiac tamponade among patients experiencing CAP. Methods: From the medical records of nine centers of invasive cardiology in southern Poland, we retrospectively selected 81 patients (80% with acute myocardial infarction) who had iatrogenic CAP with a visible extravasation jet during angiography (corresponding to type III CAP by the Ellis classification, CAP III) over a 15-year period (2005–2019). Clinical, angiographic and periprocedural characteristics were compared between the patients who developed acute cardiac tamponade requiring urgent pericardiocentesis in the cathlab (n = 21) and those with CAP III and without tamponade (n = 60). Results: CAP III were situated in the left anterior descending artery (LAD) or its diagonal branches (51%, n = 41), right coronary artery (RCA) (24%, n = 19), left circumflex coronary artery (LCx) (16%, n = 13), its obtuse marginal branches (7%, n = 6) and left main coronary artery (2%, n = 2). Acute cardiac tamponade occurred in 24% (10 of 41), 21% (4 of 19) and 37% (7 of 19) patients who experienced CAP III in the territory of LAD, RCA and LCx, respectively. There were no significant differences in the need for urgent pericardiocentesis (37%) in patients with CAP III in LCx territory (i.e., the LCx or its obtuse marginal branches) compared to CAP III in the remaining coronary arteries (23%) ( p = 0.24). However, when CAP III in the LCx were separated from CAP III in obtuse marginal branches, urgent pericardiocentesis was more frequently performed in patients with CAP III in the LCx (54%, 7 of 13) compared to subjects with CAP III in an artery other than the LCx (21%, 14 of 68) ( p = 0.03). The direction of this tendency remained consistent regardless of CAP management: prolonged balloon inflation only (n = 26, 67% vs. 13%, p = 0.08) or balloon inflation with subsequent stent implantation (n = 55, 50% vs. 24%, p = 0.13). Besides LCx involvement, no significant differences in other characteristics were observed between patients according to the need of urgent pericardiocentesis. Conclusions: CAP III in the LCx appears to lead to a higher risk of acute cardiac tamponade compared to perforations involving other coronary arteries. This association may possibly be linked to distinct features of LCx anatomy and/or well-recognized delays in diagnosis and management of LCx-related acute coronary syndromes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Increased coronary perforation in the new device era. Incidence, classification, management, and outcome.

            The incidence of coronary perforation using new percutaneous revascularization techniques may be increased compared with PTCA. Still, perforation is uncommonly reported, and the optimal management and expected outcome remain unknown. The objectives of the study were to determine the incidence of coronary perforation using balloon angioplasty (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, PTCA) and new revascularization techniques and to develop optimal strategies for its management based on classification and outcome. Eleven sites with frequent use of new revascularization devices and prospective coding of consecutive procedures for coronary perforation during 1990 to 1991 contributed to a perforation registry. Patients with perforation were matched by device with an equal-sized cohort without perforation. Data were collected centrally, and all procedural cineangiograms were reviewed at a core angiographic laboratory. A classification scheme based on angiographic appearance of the perforation (I, extraluminal crater without extravasation; II, pericardial or myocardial blushing; III, perforation > or = 1-mm diameter with contrast streaming; and cavity spilling) was evaluated as a predictor of outcome and as a basis for management. Perforation was observed in 62 of 12,900 procedures reported (0.5%; 95% confidence interval, 0.4% to 0.6%), more commonly with devices intended to remove or ablate tissue (atherectomy, laser) than with PTCA (1.3%, 0.9% to 1.6% versus 0.1%, 0.1% to 0.1%; P < .001). The perforation population was notable for its advanced age (67 +/- 10 years) and high incidence of female sex (46%) (both P < .001 compared with patients without perforation). Perforation could be treated expectantly or with PTCA but without cardiac surgery in 85%, 90%, and 44% of class I, II, and III perforations, respectively. Class I perforations (n = 13, 21%) were associated with death in none, myocardial infarction in none, and tamponade in 8%. The incidences of these adverse events were 0%, 14%, and 13% in class II perforations (n = 31, 50%) and 19%, 50%, and 63% in non-cavity spilling class III perforations, respectively (n = 16, 26%). Two of the 15 instances of cardiac tamponade (13%) were delayed, occurring within 24 hours after dismissal from the catheterization laboratory. The incidence of perforation, while low, is increased with new devices. Women and the elderly are at highest risk. The clinical risk after perforation can be classified angiographically, but even low-risk perforations occasionally have poor clinical outcome. Patients should be observed for delayed cardiac tamponade for at least 24 hours.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Coronary artery spatial distribution of acute myocardial infarction occlusions.

              Acute coronary occlusions leading to ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMIs) are due primarily to rupture of atherosclerotic plaques. Present "vulnerable plaque" detection technology focuses on identifying individual plaques with no clear therapeutic plan beyond conventional risk factor reduction. We developed a spatial map of the distribution of acute coronary occlusions to test our hypothesis that plaque ruptures do not occur uniformly throughout the coronary tree. We analyzed 208 consecutive patients who presented to the Brigham and Women's Hospital with STEMI and mapped the location of the acute coronary occlusion. These occlusions were not uniformly distributed throughout each of the major epicardial coronary arteries but tended to cluster within the proximal third of each of the vessels (right coronary artery, P=0.001; left anterior descending artery, P=0.003; left circumflex artery, P=0.001). Furthermore, Poisson regression showed that for each 10-mm increase in distance from the ostium, the risk of an acute coronary occlusion was significantly decreased by 13% in the right coronary artery, 30% in the left anterior descending artery, and 26% in the left circumflex artery. Acute coronary occlusions leading to STEMI tend to cluster in predictable "hot spots" within the proximal third of the coronary arteries. Identification of these high-risk zones for acute coronary occlusions will lead to future advances in vulnerable plaque detection technology and potentially locally directed preventive strategies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Clin Med
                J Clin Med
                jcm
                Journal of Clinical Medicine
                MDPI
                2077-0383
                21 September 2020
                September 2020
                : 9
                : 9
                : 3043
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Students’ Scientific Group at the Second Department of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 30-688 Cracow, Poland; msurdacki1997@ 123456gmail.com (M.A.S.); marcin.major@ 123456student.uj.edu.pl (M.M.)
                [2 ]Second Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 30-688 Cracow, Poland; michal.chyrchel@ 123456uj.edu.pl (M.C.); mcrakows@ 123456cyf-kr.edu.pl (T.R.); l_bryniarski@ 123456poczta.fm (L.B.); surdacki.andreas@ 123456gmx.net (A.S.); mbbartus@ 123456cyfronet.pl (S.B.)
                [3 ]Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, University Hospital, 30-688 Cracow, Poland
                [4 ]Laboratory of Hemodynamics and Invasive Cardiology, District Hospital, 97-500 Radomsko, Poland
                [5 ]Department of Interventional Cardiology, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-202 Cracow, Poland; kleczu@ 123456interia.pl (P.K.); jacek.legutko@ 123456uj.edu.pl (J.L.)
                [6 ]Subcarpathian Cardiovascular Intervention Center, 38-500 Sanok, Poland; wisniewskiandrzej@ 123456yahoo.com
                [7 ]Center for Invasive Cardiology, Electrotherapy and Angiology, 38-400 Krosno, Poland; m.nosal@ 123456intercard.net.pl
                [8 ]Interventional Cardiology Department, District Hospital, 37-450 Stalowa Wola, Poland; mujda@ 123456poczta.onet.pl
                [9 ]Center for Invasive Cardiology, Electrotherapy and Angiology, 33-300 Nowy Sącz, Poland; r.korpak-wysocka@ 123456intercard.net.pl
                [10 ]Center for Invasive Cardiology, Electrotherapy and Angiology, 32-600 Oświęcim, Poland; witowz@ 123456gmail.com
                [11 ]Invasive Cardiology, Electrotherapy and Angiology Center, 27-400 Ostrowiec Świętokrzyski, Poland; mmaliszewski@ 123456gvmcarint.eu
                [12 ]Department of Cardiology, District Hospital, 42-300 Myszków, Poland; marcin.rzeszutko@ 123456uj.edu.pl
                [13 ]Department of Angiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 30-688 Cracow, Poland
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: lukasz.rzeszutko@ 123456uj.edu.pl ; Tel.: +48-12-400-2250
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6478-6186
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7949-3140
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6352-6024
                Article
                jcm-09-03043
                10.3390/jcm9093043
                7565780
                32967327
                0e484422-1a7a-4ca7-a33b-40127ee15b00
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 12 August 2020
                : 16 September 2020
                Categories
                Article

                coronary perforation,cardiac tamponade,percutaneous coronary intervention,left circumflex coronary artery

                Comments

                Comment on this article