3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Proximity and knowledge gatekeepers: the case of the Polytechnic University of Turin

      Journal of Knowledge Management
      Emerald

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          The paper aims to investigate how proximity dimensions affect the establishment of different knowledge relationships between gatekeepers and other economic actors involved in their knowledge‐based networks.

          Design/methodology/approach

          The methodology is based on an inductive research approach, represented by the explorative case study of the Polytechnic University of Turin. The University's knowledge relationships are identified and distinguished through the analysis of its patent joint‐developments, citations, and R&D projects. Then, for each knowledge relationship, geographical, organizational, and technological proximity between the University and the other economic actors are assessed, adopting suitable proxies.

          Findings

          The data reveal that the University activates collaborative and exploitative relationships with actors characterized by geographical, organizational, and technological proximity. In contrast, collaborative and explorative relationships seem to require actors characterized by more distant technological competencies. Furthermore, the exchange of knowledge by means of non‐collaborative relationships occurs between the University and actors characterized only by technological proximity.

          Research limitations/implications

          On the basis of this analysis, actors can identify which proximity dimensions assume an important role for activating knowledge flows with gatekeepers. Regarding policy implications, the paper highlights how policy makers should leverage proximities in order to favour and support the exchange of knowledge, hence improving the innovative capability, competitiveness, and attractiveness of regional areas.

          Originality/value

          This research contributes to shed further light on the nature of the relationships and knowledge flows exchanged by the gatekeepers. In particular, it analyzes how relational attributes can affect the knowledge transfer processes between economic actors.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage

          Jay Barney (1991)
          Understanding sources of sustained competitive advantage has become a major area of research in strategic management. Building on the assumptions that strategic resources are heterogeneously distributed acrossfirms and that these differences are stable over time, this article examines the link betweenfirm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Four empirical indicators of the potential of firm resources to generate sustained competitive advantage-value, rareness, imitability, and substitutability-are discussed. The model is applied by analyzing the potential of severalfirm resourcesfor generating sustained competitive advantages. The article concludes by examining implications of this firm resource model of sustained competitive advantage for other business disciplines.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Strength of Weak Ties

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Knowledge Management
                Emerald
                1367-3270
                September 12 2008
                September 12 2008
                : 12
                : 5
                : 34-51
                Article
                10.1108/13673270810902920
                0e4d3312-5b73-4596-937c-23e2d2514d5d
                © 2008

                https://www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article