7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Integrating, summarizing and visualizing GWAS-hits and human diversity with DANCE (Disease-ANCEstry networks)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references2

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Editorial: NAR Surveys the Past, Present and Future of Restriction Endonucleases

          In this issue, Nucleic Acids Research presents five Survey and Summary articles that describe the historical development of studies on restriction endonucleases and summarize much of our current understanding of this diverse and complex group of enzymes. The first of these articles, entitled ‘Highlights of the DNA cutters: a short history of the restriction enzymes’ (1), describes seminal studies on bacteriophage host restriction, details subsequent work on type I and type III enzymes that established the restriction-modification (RM) paradigm and summarizes other landmark events that led to restriction enzymes becoming a main driving force in the development of modern biotechnology and molecular medicine. Other Survey and Summary articles in this issue describe three of the major types of RM systems as they are understood today (2–4). The different types of RM systems—of which there are currently four—vary in their cofactor dependence, in the spatial relationship of DNA binding and cleavage sites and in the way in which endonuclease and modification activities are physically and mechanistically coupled to one another. The last of the Survey and Summary articles in this issue discusses RM systems in the broader context of toxin–antitoxin genetic systems, which exist in great variety throughout the microbial world (5). With this issue, NAR enters its 42nd year of publication. The journal was founded during the period when restriction endonucleases began to be widely adopted for molecular biology research. An article in one of our first issues presented an early restriction map of the SV40 virus, which was an essential precursor to the sequencing of the viral genome (6). Another article from journal’s early years described a widely adopted method for restriction enzyme purification (7). In subsequent years, we published semiannual updates describing the popular REBASE database. Indeed, >10% of the articles published since the journal’s inception are indexed as dealing with RM systems in a significant fashion. The current collection of Survey and Summary articles thus builds on our long tradition of coverage of this field. It is important to recognize that the structural protein folds, catalytic motifs and catalytic mechanisms that are found in restriction endonucleases and methyltransferases are also observed in a wide variety of other enzymes, including those responsible for the transfer of mobile DNA elements, the repair of DNA lesions and the maintenance of genome integrity. Several decades of detailed studies of restriction endonucleases (and of their corresponding modification enzymes) have motivated and informed investigations in these other areas of biology. At the same time, RM systems have provided the reagents required for the development of rapid and inexpensive genome sequencing technologies, powerful strategies for genome engineering, new methods for therapeutic gene modification and correction and novel protein- and cell-based medicines. We hope that, as well as being interesting and informative, the current articles will remind our readers of the importance of basic research for the development of future therapies and new applications in biotechnology. In retrospect, the contribution of restriction endonucleases to modern molecular biology and biomedicine seems obvious and inevitable. However, it should be remembered that the original studies of phage restriction were driven purely by intellectual curiosity, and were supported by research infrastructures that valued discovery for discovery’s sake. The critical importance of such studies for creating new technologies for medicine and technology, as illustrated by >60 years of restriction endonuclease research, can be used as an example for all who believe in the importance of research and development for future generations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Common variants in major histocompatibility complex region and TCF4 gene are significantly associated with schizophrenia in Han Chinese.

            Schizophrenia is a complex major psychiatric disorder affecting ∼1% of the world population. Recently, in a genome-wide association study and a follow-up in Caucasians, Stefansson et al. examined 7662 schizophrenic cases and 29053 normal control subjects and reported seven common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that were significantly (>10(-8)) associated with schizophrenia. To investigate whether these risk SNPs were significantly associated in Han Chinese, we analyzed the seven SNPs in 2496 schizophrenia patients and 5184 normal control subjects. Because only three of the seven SNPs were polymorphic in Han Chinese, we genotyped two additional common SNPs from the same risk regions. Three SNPs, rs6932590 (p = .00096), rs3131296 (p = 1.29 × 10(-6)), and rs3130375 (p = 1.76 × 10(-5)), mapping to the major histocompatibility complex region and one SNP rs2958182 (p = 3.64 × 10(-6)) located in the TCF4 gene were significant in our sample set. A meta-analysis using published genome-wide association study results also supported our findings. Our results confirm that common risk factors in the major histocompatibility complex region and TCF4 gene are associated with schizophrenia in Han Chinese, but our results fail to show an association with SNP rs12807809 in the NRGN gene. Copyright © 2010 Society of Biological Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark

              Author and article information

              Journal
              Bioinformatics
              Bioinformatics
              Oxford University Press (OUP)
              1367-4803
              1460-2059
              April 07 2016
              April 15 2016
              April 15 2016
              December 15 2015
              : 32
              : 8
              : 1247-1249
              Article
              10.1093/bioinformatics/btv708
              0e61618a-d54e-4ea4-a5e2-f38fc3df0e8c
              © 2015
              History

              Comments

              Comment on this article