10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Low-Carbohydrate Diet Score and Macronutrient Intake in Relation to Survival After Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          A low-carbohydrate diet may improve cancer survival, but relevant clinical evidence remains limited.

          Methods

          We followed 1542 stages I to III colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who completed a validated food frequency questionnaire between 6 months and 4 years after diagnosis. We calculated overall, animal-, and plant-rich, low-carbohydrate diet scores and examined their associations with CRC-specific and overall mortality using Cox proportional hazards regression after adjusting for potential predictors for cancer survival. We also assessed the intake and changes of macronutrients after diagnosis. Statistical tests were two-sided.

          Results

          Although no association was found for overall and animal-rich low-carbohydrate diet score, plant-rich, low-carbohydrate diet, which emphasizes plant sources of fat and protein with moderate consumption of animal products, was associated with lower CRC-specific mortality (hazard ratio [HR] comparing extreme quartiles = 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.25 to 0.57, P trend < .001). Carbohydrate intake was associated with higher CRC-specific mortality, and this association was restricted to carbohydrate consumed from refined starches and sugars (HR per one-SD increment = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.14 to 1.62, P trend < .001). In contrast, replacing carbohydrate with plant fat and protein was associated with lower CRC-specific mortality, with the HR per one-SD increment of 0.81 (95% CI = 0.69 to 0.95, P trend = .01) for plant fat and 0.77 (95% CI = 0.62 to 0.95, P trend = .02) for plant protein. Similar results were obtained for overall mortality and when changes in macronutrient intake after diagnosis were assessed.

          Conclusion

          Plant-rich, low-carbohydrate diet score was associated with lower mortality in patients with nonmetastatic CRC. Substituting plant fat and protein for carbohydrate, particularly that from refined starches and sugars, may improve patients’ survival.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Metabolic syndrome, hyperinsulinemia, and colon cancer: a review.

          An impressive body of epidemiologic data collected over the past decade indicates that the risk of colon cancer is elevated in those with metabolic syndrome. This evidence includes studies that examined the risk of colon cancer or adenoma in relation to determinants of the metabolic syndrome (obesity, abdominal distribution of adiposity, and physical inactivity), clinical consequences of this syndrome (type 2 diabetes and hypertension), plasma or serum components of the definition of metabolic syndrome (hypertriglyceridemia, hyperglycemia, and low HDL cholesterol), and markers of hyperinsulinemia or insulin resistance (insulin and C-peptide), which is the underlying metabolic defect of the metabolic syndrome. The mechanism underlying these associations is unknown but may involve the influence of hyperinsulinemia in enhancing free or bioavailable concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-1. Future studies should also be based on better measurements of insulin resistance, beta-cell depletion, and insulin responses to better assess which aspects of insulin resistance are most closely related to the risk of colon neoplasia.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Low-carbohydrate-diet score and the risk of coronary heart disease in women.

            Low-carbohydrate diets have been advocated for weight loss and to prevent obesity, but the long-term safety of these diets has not been determined. We evaluated data on 82,802 women in the Nurses' Health Study who had completed a validated food-frequency questionnaire. Data from the questionnaire were used to calculate a low-carbohydrate-diet score, which was based on the percentage of energy as carbohydrate, fat, and protein (a higher score reflects a higher intake of fat and protein and a lower intake of carbohydrate). The association between the low-carbohydrate-diet score and the risk of coronary heart disease was examined. During 20 years of follow-up, we documented 1994 new cases of coronary heart disease. After multivariate adjustment, the relative risk of coronary heart disease comparing highest and lowest deciles of the low-carbohydrate-diet score was 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76 to 1.18; P for trend=0.19). The relative risk comparing highest and lowest deciles of a low-carbohydrate-diet score on the basis of the percentage of energy from carbohydrate, animal protein, and animal fat was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.74 to 1.19; P for trend=0.52), whereas the relative risk on the basis of the percentage of energy from intake of carbohydrates, vegetable protein, and vegetable fat was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.88; P for trend=0.002). A higher glycemic load was strongly associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease (relative risk comparing highest and lowest deciles, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.15 to 3.15; P for trend=0.003). Our findings suggest that diets lower in carbohydrate and higher in protein and fat are not associated with increased risk of coronary heart disease in women. When vegetable sources of fat and protein are chosen, these diets may moderately reduce the risk of coronary heart disease. Copyright 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Low-carbohydrate diets and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: two cohort studies.

              Data on the long-term association between low-carbohydrate diets and mortality are sparse. To examine the association of low-carbohydrate diets with mortality during 26 years of follow-up in women and 20 years in men. Prospective cohort study of women and men who were followed from 1980 (women) or 1986 (men) until 2006. Low-carbohydrate diets, either animal-based (emphasizing animal sources of fat and protein) or vegetable-based (emphasizing vegetable sources of fat and protein), were computed from several validated food-frequency questionnaires assessed during follow-up. Nurses' Health Study and Health Professionals' Follow-up Study. 85 168 women (aged 34 to 59 years at baseline) and 44 548 men (aged 40 to 75 years at baseline) without heart disease, cancer, or diabetes. Investigators documented 12 555 deaths (2458 cardiovascular-related and 5780 cancer-related) in women and 8678 deaths (2746 cardiovascular-related and 2960 cancer-related) in men. The overall low-carbohydrate score was associated with a modest increase in overall mortality in a pooled analysis (hazard ratio [HR] comparing extreme deciles, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.01 to 1.24]; P for trend = 0.136). The animal low-carbohydrate score was associated with higher all-cause mortality (pooled HR comparing extreme deciles, 1.23 [CI, 1.11 to 1.37]; P for trend = 0.051), cardiovascular mortality (corresponding HR, 1.14 [CI, 1.01 to 1.29]; P for trend = 0.029), and cancer mortality (corresponding HR, 1.28 [CI, 1.02 to 1.60]; P for trend = 0.089). In contrast, a higher vegetable low-carbohydrate score was associated with lower all-cause mortality (HR, 0.80 [CI, 0.75 to 0.85]; P for trend
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JNCI Cancer Spectr
                JNCI Cancer Spectr
                jncics
                Jnci Cancer Spectrum
                Oxford University Press
                2515-5091
                November 2018
                28 January 2019
                28 January 2019
                : 2
                : 4
                : pky077
                Author notes

                See the Notes section for the full list of authors’ affiliations.

                Correspondence to: Mingyang Song, MD, ScD, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 667 Huntington Avenue, Kresge 906A, Boston, MA 02115 (e-mail: mingyangsong@ 123456mail.harvard.edu ).
                Article
                pky077
                10.1093/jncics/pky077
                6350503
                30734025
                0e63ebd2-bd6d-4fc7-b13e-56a353588f2c
                © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 17 August 2018
                : 31 October 2018
                : 20 November 2018
                Page count
                Pages: 8
                Funding
                Funded by: American Cancer Society 10.13039/100000048
                Award ID: MRSG-17–220–01
                Funded by: AACR-AstraZeneca Fellowship
                Award ID: 17–40–12-SONG
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health 10.13039/100000002
                Award ID: K99 CA215314
                Award ID: R00 CA215314
                Award ID: U01 CA167552
                Award ID: P01 CA87969
                Award ID: UM1 CA186107
                Award ID: P01 CA55075
                Award ID: UM1 CA167552
                Award ID: P50 CA127003
                Award ID: K24 DK098311
                Award ID: R01 CA137178
                Award ID: R01 CA202704
                Award ID: R01 CA176272
                Award ID: R01 CA151993
                Award ID: R35 CA197735
                Funded by: American Institute for Cancer Research 10.13039/100000969
                Funded by: Project P Fund for Colorectal Cancer Research
                Funded by: Dana-Farber Cancer Institute 10.13039/100007886
                Funded by: Bennett Family Fund
                Funded by: National Colorectal Cancer Research Alliance
                Funded by: Suzanne Steele MGH Research Scholar
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article