14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Beyond Biology: The Crucial Role of Sex and Gender in Oncology

      Submit here before May 31, 2024

      About Oncology Research and Treatment: 2.4 Impact Factor I 3.3 CiteScore I 0.495 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      UFT as Maintenance Therapy in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Cancer Responsive to the FOLFOX4 Regimen

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: In advanced colorectal cancer (ACC), FOLFOX4 has been accepted as a standard chemotherapeutic regimen. Due to the neurotoxicity induced by oxaliplatin, which occurs in about 50% of patients during the 6-month FOLFOX4 regimen, and the frequent need for hospitalization, alternative regimens may be required. We aimed to determine whether a ‘maintenance’ therapy with oral UFT (uracil-tegafur) in patients responding to FOLFOX4 is able to maintain the response and improve the quality of life (QoL) as a result of the outpatient regimen and lower psychological distress. Methods: Untreated patients with ACC who did not progress after 6 months of FOLFOX4 received oral UFT until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The aim of the study was to maintain the response obtained with the FOLFOX4 regimen for at least 6 months. The secondary objective was to evaluate QoL during the two different treatment regimens utilizing the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Results: From January 2003 to August 2004, out of the enrolled 30 patients [22 males and 8 females; 2 patients with a complete response (CR), 14 patients with a partial response (PR) and 6 patients in stable disease (SD) after 6 months of FOLFOX4] 22 continued therapy with UFT until progression without significant toxicity; the remaining 8 patients (27%) had progressive disease (PD) during or at the end of FOLFOX4 and were treated with other regimen. After 6 months of UFT, 4 patients (13%) had CR, 6 patients (20%) PR and 4 patients (13%) SD; 16 patients (53%) progressed. Median follow-up was 31 months [interquartile range (IQR): 20–31 months]; 14 patients died of PD. The median time to progression was 13.9 (IQR: 7.7–20.1) months and the median survival time was 31 months (IQR: 20–31 months). Evaluation of QoL demonstrated a trend towards better QoL during UFT treatment. Conclusions: These results support the feasibility of maintaining good response and improving QoL (measured by SF-36) with an oral fluoropyrimidine after combination chemotherapy in ACC patients; moreover, since UFT can be used orally, patient compliance is increased and the duration of hospitalization can be decreased.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          OPTIMOX1: a randomized study of FOLFOX4 or FOLFOX7 with oxaliplatin in a stop-and-Go fashion in advanced colorectal cancer--a GERCOR study.

          In metastatic colorectal cancer, a combination of leucovorin (LV) and fluorouracil (FU) with oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) 4 is a standard first-line regimen. The cumulative neurotoxicity of oxaliplatin often requires therapy to be stopped in patients who are still responding. This study evaluates a new strategy of intermittent oxaliplatin treatment that is based on FOLFOX7, a simplified leucovorin and fluorouracil regimen with high-dose oxaliplatin. Previously untreated patients were randomly assigned to either FOLFOX4 administered every 2 weeks until progression (arm A) or FOLFOX7 for six cycles, maintenance without oxaliplatin for 12 cycles, and reintroduction of FOLFOX7 (arm B). Six hundred twenty patients were enrolled, including an exploratory cohort of 95 elderly or poor prognosis patients. Median progression-free survival and survival times were 9.0 and 19.3 months, respectively, in patients allocated to arm A compared with 8.7 and 21.2 months, respectively, in patients allocated to arm B (P = not significant). Response rates were 58.5% with arm A and 59.2% with arm B. National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3 or 4 toxicity was observed in 54.4% of the patients in arm A v 48.7% of patients in arm B. From cycle 7, fewer patients experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicity in arm B. Grade 3 sensory neuropathy was observed in 17.9% of the patients in arm A v 13.3% of patients in arm B (P = .12). In arm B, oxaliplatin was reintroduced in only 40.1% of the patients but achieved responses or stabilizations in 69.4% of these patients. Oxaliplatin can be safely stopped after six cycles in a FOLFOX regimen. Further study is needed to fully evaluate oxaliplatin reintroduction.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Oxaliplatin-safety profile: neurotoxicity.

            A. Grothey (2003)
            Oxaliplatin has become an integral part of various chemotherapy protocols, and in advanced colorectal cancer in particular. While oxaliplatin has only mild hematologic and gastrointestinal side effects, its dose-limiting toxicity is a cumulative sensory neurotoxicity that resembles that of cisplatin with the important difference of a more rapid and complete reversibility. The reversibility of neurotoxicity has been assured in long-term follow-up of patients who have received adjuvant oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. In addition, oxaliplatin causes a very unique, but frequent, acute sensory neuropathy that is triggered or aggravated by exposure to cold but is rapidly reversible, without persistent impairment of sensory function. Various strategies have been proposed to prevent or treat oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity. The "Stop-and-Go" concept uses the reversibility of neurologic symptoms to aim at delivering higher cumulative oxaliplatin doses as long as the therapy is still effective. Several neuromodulatory agents such as calcium-magnesium infusions, antiepileptic drugs like carbamazepine or gabapentin, amifostine, alpha-lipoic acid, and glutathione have shown promising activity in prophylaxis and treatment of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity. However, larger confirmatory trials are still lacking so that, to date, no evidence-based recommendation can be given for the prophylaxis of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity. The predictability of neurotoxicity associated with oxaliplatin-based therapy should allow patients and doctors to develop strategies to manage this side effect in view of the individual patient's clinical situation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Clinical aspects and molecular basis of oxaliplatin neurotoxicity: current management and development of preventive measures.

              Neurotoxicity is the most frequent dose-limiting toxicity of oxaliplatin. Acute neurotoxicity is characterized by the rapid onset of cold-induced distal dysesthesia and/or paresthesia. Sensory symptoms may also be accompanied by cold-dependent muscular contractions of the extremities or the jaw. The symptoms, often occurring during or shortly after infusion, are usually transient and mild. A persistent sensory peripheral neuropathy may also develop with prolonged treatment, eventually causing superficial and deep sensory loss, sensory ataxia, and functional impairment. Studies have shown patients with acute sensory symptoms to display little or no axonal degeneration, suggesting a specific effect of oxaliplatin on sensory neurons and/or motor neurons or muscle cells that is not observed with other platinum agents. The similarity of the acute symptoms induced by oxaliplatin with those caused by several drugs or toxins acting on neuronal or muscular ion channels suggests that these symptoms may result from a specific interaction of oxaliplatin with ion channels located in the cellular membrane. Recent data indicate that oxaliplatin may act on specific isoforms of the voltage gated sodium (Na(+)) channel to increase the excitability of sensory neurons, an action inhibited by the Na(+) channel blocker carbamazepine. This contention is supported by recent clinical findings indicating that pharmacologic blockade of Na(+) channels may prevent and/or repress the acute neurotoxicity of oxaliplatin. Although there is no indication at the moment that a common cellular mechanism induces both the acute and the cumulative neurotoxicity of oxaliplatin, controlled clinical trials are currently underway to establish the value of Na(+) channel blockade against both acute and cumulative oxaliplatin neurotoxicities. Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                OCL
                Oncology
                10.1159/issn.0030-2414
                Oncology
                S. Karger AG
                0030-2414
                1423-0232
                2007
                February 2008
                11 January 2008
                : 72
                : 5-6
                : 267-273
                Affiliations
                aDipartimento di Medicina Interna, Oncologia e Gastroenterologia, Università degli Studi di Pavia, e bServizio di Biometria ed Epidemiologia Clinica, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, e cUnità Operativa di Oncologia Medica, Presidio Ospedaliero Sant’Anna Como, Como, Italia
                Article
                113037 Oncology 2007;72:267–273
                10.1159/000113037
                18187947
                0e9c29b5-cd95-4111-9205-08cebbb36645
                © 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 30 July 2007
                : 01 August 2007
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 4, References: 27, Pages: 7
                Categories
                Clinical Study

                Oncology & Radiotherapy,Pathology,Surgery,Obstetrics & Gynecology,Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine,Hematology
                Quality of life,Oral chemotherapy,Oxaliplatin,SF-36 questionnaire,UFT,5-Fluorouracil,FOLFOX4,Metastatic colorectal cancer

                Comments

                Comment on this article