19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Design and Validation of a Method to Determine the Position of the Fovea by Using the Nerve-Head to Fovea Distance of the Fellow Eye

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          To measure the nerve-head to fovea distance (NFD) on fundus photographs in fellow eyes, and to compare the NFD between fellow eyes.

          Methods

          Diabetic patients without retinopathy, (n = 183) who were screened by fundus photography at the University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands from January 1 st 2005 until January 1 st 2006 were included. The NFD was measured in left and right eyes both from the center and from the rim of the nerve-head. To determine inter- and intra-observer agreement, repeated measurements by one observer (n = 3) were performed on all photographs and by two observers on 60 photographs (30 paired eyes). The effect of age, gender, and refractive error on NFD was analysed.

          Results

          The correlation of NFDs between the left and the right eye was 0.958 when measured from the center of the nerve head (mean difference 0.0078 mm. ±SD 0.079 (95% limits of agreement −0.147–0.163)) and 0.963 when measured from the rim (mean difference 0.0056±SD 0.073 (95% limits of agreement −0.137–0.149)). Using the NFD between fellow eyes interchangeably, resulted in a standard error of 0.153 mm. Intra- and inter-observer variability was small. We found a significant effect of age (center of the nerve-head (P = 0.006) and rim of the nerve head (P = 0.003)) and refractive error (center of nerve-head (P<0.001) and rim of nerve head (P<0.001)) on NFD.

          Conclusions

          The NFD in one eye provides a confident, reproducible, and valid method to address the position of the fovea in the fellow eye. We recommend using the NFD measured from the center of the nerve-head since the standard error by this method was smallest. Age and refractive error have an effect on NFD.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical use of ultrasound biomicroscopy.

          The authors have developed a method of obtaining images of cross-sections of the intact anterior globe at microscopic resolution. High-frequency ultrasound transducers (50-100 MHz) have been developed and incorporated into a clinical B-scan device capable of producing images in the living human eye to a depth of approximately 4 mm at an axial and lateral resolution approaching 20 microns. Clinical use of this instrument is no more difficult than conventional immersion ultrasonography. The authors' results in a series of 14 clinical cases have shown that this method can provide information unavailable from any other imaging technique. Anterior segment tumors difficult to define with conventional ultrasound can be measured and the extent of invasion determined. Differentiation of tissue on the basis of internal acoustic characteristics is aided by the very fine backscatter speckle patterns at these frequencies. Pathology behind anterior segment opacities can be imaged in detail and the ability to image angle structures in cross-section allows a new quantitative method of gonioscopy. The ability to define the relationship of the iris, posterior chamber, zonules, ciliary body, and lens is potentially helpful in understanding mechanisms of glaucoma. Ocular structures can be measured with increased accuracy. Clinical ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) has shown significant potential as an aid in diagnoses of ocular disease.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Optic disc, cup and neuroretinal rim size, configuration and correlations in normal eyes.

            Four hundred and fifty-seven unselected normal human optic nerve heads of 319 subjects (163 men, 156 women, mean age 42.7 +/- 19.6 years) were evaluated by magnification-corrected morphometry of optic disc photographs. Mean optic disc surface measured 2.69 +/- 0.70 mm2 (0.80-5.54 mm2), mean diameter horizontally 1.76 +/- 0.31 mm (0.91-2.61 mm), and vertically 1.92 +/- 0.29 mm (0.96-2.91 mm). The form was slightly vertically oval. Optic cup area averaged 0.72 +/- 0.70 (0.00-3.41 mm2), mean horizontal cup diameter 0.83 +/- 0.58 mm (0.00-2.08 mm) and mean vertical diameter 0.77 +/- 0.55 mm (0.00-2.13 mm). The cup was significantly (P less than 0.0001) larger in discs with steep "punched-out" cups (1.37 +/- 0.62 mm2) compared to discs having cups with temporal flat slopes (0.59 +/- 0.39 mm2). Neuroretinal rim area ranged from 0.80 to 4.66 mm2 (mean 1.97 +/- 0.50 mm2), and was significantly correlated (P less than 0.00001) to the optic disc area. It was broadest in the inferior optic disc region (P less than 0.001), followed by the superior, nasal and temporal (P less than 0.001) regions. Horizontal cup/disc ratio (mean 0.39 +/- 0.28, minimum 0.00, maximum 0.87) was larger in 426 (93.2%) optic discs than the vertical one (mean 0.34 +/- 0.25, minimum 0.00, maximum 0.85). Concerning optic disc area, side differences of 0.10 mm2 or less were detected in 28%, of 0.2 mm2 or less in 46% and of 0.50 mm2 or less in 80% (cumulative frequencies). Concerning neuroretinal rim area, side differences of 0.10 mm2 or less were found in 31%, of 0.20 mm2 or less in 52% and of 0.50 mm2 or less in 84%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Preferred retinal loci relationship to macular scotomas in a low-vision population.

              The authors identified patterns in preferred retinal locus (PRL) ability and location relative to macular scotomas in a low-vision patient population. Scanning laser ophthalmoscope macular perimetry and PRL testing were performed on 825 patients with low vision. The PRL location was determined, and a PRL scoring system was devised and used to measure the pursuit ability, fixation stability, and saccadic ability of the PRL. The characteristics of dense scotomas within 2.5 degrees of the PRL were noted. Eighty-four percent (1130 of 1339 eyes) of the eyes had an established PRL. Preferred retinal loci varied across the full range of ability scores and varied in size for fixation stability from 1.0 degrees to 9.0 degrees in diameter. There was a central dense scotoma in 82.5% of the eyes, whereas 8.4% had a paracentral dense scotoma. In 14.8% of the eyes, the PRL had no dense scotomas on any of its borders; one, two, three, or four (a ring) borders had a dense scotoma in 39.7%, 19.0%, 9.0%, and 17.4% of eyes, respectively. When the PRL had only one scotomatous border, the resulting field defect was located superior in 39.0%, right in 33.7%, left in 19.9%, and inferior in 7.5% of eyes. The majority of patients with low vision, as many as four of five patients, have dense scotomas encumbering the PRL for visual tasks. Approximately one of six patients with low vision have the PRL completely surrounded by dense scotomas. The visual system shows a strong tendency not to place a PRL anatomically above a scotoma (field defect below fixation) and a weaker tendency not to place the PRL anatomically to the right of a scotoma (field defect to the left of fixation). Macular perimetry and PRL evaluations can provide considerable information on the functional status of the macula, which may be useful to rehabilitation professionals.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2013
                7 May 2013
                : 8
                : 5
                : e62518
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
                [2 ]Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
                University of Tennessee, United States of America
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Obtained funding for the study: MP LL JH. Conceived and designed the experiments: MP DC WJ LL JH. Performed the experiments: FN LL. Analyzed the data: MP IM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MP IN WJ JH LL. Wrote the paper: MP IN WJ JH LL.

                Article
                PONE-D-12-32237
                10.1371/journal.pone.0062518
                3646827
                23667483
                0ebd29ed-388c-4544-ac17-6560fbc4034a
                Copyright @ 2013

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 19 October 2012
                : 20 March 2013
                Page count
                Pages: 9
                Funding
                Stichting Blindenhulp, Stichting Nederlands Oogheelkundig Onderzoek, and Professor Mulder Stichting. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine
                Anatomy and Physiology
                Physiological Processes
                Aging
                Clinical Research Design
                Retrospective Studies
                Endocrinology
                Diabetic Endocrinology
                Ophthalmology
                Radiology
                Diagnostic Radiology
                Computed Tomography
                Ultrasonography
                Surgery
                Ophthalmology

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article