4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Gender Differences in Case Volume Among Ophthalmology Residents

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Do differences in cataract surgery and total procedural volume exist between US male and female residents during ophthalmology residency training? This analysis of the case logs of 1271 ophthalmology residents from 24 US ophthalmology residency programs estimates that female residents performed 7.8 to 22.2 fewer cataract operations and 36.0 to 80.2 fewer total procedures compared with their male counterparts from 2005 to 2017, and the gap widened during this period for total procedural volume. The current state of surgical training in ophthalmology residency programs deserves further study to ensure that male and female residents have equivalent training experiences. This analysis of case logs from US ophthalmology residency programs assesses differences between male and female ophthalmology residents for cataract surgery and total procedural volume. Although almost equal numbers of male and female medical students enter into ophthalmology residency programs, whether they have similar surgical experiences during training is unclear. To determine differences for cataract surgery and total procedural volume between male and female residents during ophthalmology residency. This retrospective, longitudinal analysis of resident case logs from 24 US ophthalmology residency programs spanned July 2005 to June 2017. A total of 1271 residents were included. Data were analyzed from August 12, 2017, through April 4, 2018. Variables analyzed included mean volumes of cataract surgery and total procedures, resident gender, and maternity or paternity leave status. Among the 1271 residents included in the analysis (815 men [64.1%]), being female was associated with performing fewer cataract operations and total procedures. Male residents performed a mean (SD) of 176.7 (66.2) cataract operations, and female residents performed a mean (SD) of 161.7 (56.2) (mean difference, −15.0 [95% CI, −22.2 to −7.8]; P  < .001); men performed a mean (SD) of 509.4 (208.6) total procedures and women performed a mean (SD) of 451.3 (158.8) (mean difference, −58.1 [95% CI, −80.2 to −36.0]; P  < .001). Eighty-five of 815 male residents (10.4%) and 71 of 456 female residents (15.6%) took parental leave. Male residents who took paternity leave performed a mean of 27.5 (95% CI, 13.3 to 41.6; P  < .001) more cataract operations compared with men who did not take leave, but female residents who took maternity leave performed similar numbers of operations as women who did not take leave (mean difference, −2.0 [95% CI, −18.0 to 14.0]; P  = .81). From 2005 to 2017, each additional year was associated with a 5.5 (95% CI, 4.4 to 6.7; P  < .001) increase in cataract volume and 24.4 (95% CI, 20.9 to 27.8; P  < .001) increase in total procedural volume. This increase was not different between genders for cataract procedure volume (β = −1.6 [95% CI, −3.7 to 0.4]; P  = .11) but was different for total procedural volume such that the increase in total procedural volume over time for men was greater than that for women (β = −8.0 [95% CI, −14.0 to −2.1]; P  = .008). Female residents performed 7.8 to 22.2 fewer cataract operations and 36.0 to 80.2 fewer total procedures compared with their male counterparts from 2005 to 2017, a finding that warrants further exploration to ensure that residents have equivalent surgical training experiences during residency regardless of gender. However, this study included a limited number of programs (24 of 119 [20.2%]). Future research including all ophthalmology residency programs may minimize the selection bias issues present in this study.

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The resident surgeon phacoemulsification learning curve.

          To analyze outcomes of resident-performed phacoemulsifications and to assess the resident phacoemulsification learning curve. Retrospective chart review of resident-performed phacoemulsification cases at the Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Decatur, Georgia, from July 1, 1999, through June 30, 2002. Outcomes measured included postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), intraoperative complications, and adjusted phacoemulsification times (total phacoemulsification time multiplied by phacoemulsification power used). We analyzed 680 cases. Postoperative mean UCVA was 20/39, and mean BSCVA was 20/25 (> or = 20/20 in 44.0% of cases and > or = 20/40 in 97.8%). There were no differences in visual acuity outcomes over the course of residency training. Intraoperative complications occurred in 34 cases (5.0%), with a significant reduction in vitreous loss rates after the first 80 resident cases (5.1% vs 1.9%; P = .03). Mean adjusted phacoemulsification time was 0.68 minutes, with a significant reduction in adjusted phacoemulsification time after the first 80 cases (0.87 vs 0.52 minutes; P < .001). Quality visual outcomes after phacoemulsification can be attained throughout residency training; however, surgical competency, when measured by complication rates and phacoemulsification efficiency, continues to improve significantly with increasing surgical experience well beyond the first 80 resident phacoemulsification cases.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Characterizing the learning curve in phacoemulsification.

            To characterize how residents learn phacoemulsification and determine which steps of the procedure are most difficult to master.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Gender Characteristics Among Academic Ophthalmology Leadership, Faculty, and Residents: Results from a Cross-Sectional Survey

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Ophthalmology
                JAMA Ophthalmol
                American Medical Association (AMA)
                2168-6165
                July 18 2019
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Ophthalmology, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
                [2 ]Department of Ophthalmology, University of Florida, Gainesville
                [3 ]Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
                [4 ]Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
                [5 ]Department of Ophthalmology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
                [6 ]Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
                [7 ]Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
                [8 ]Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark
                [9 ]Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas
                [10 ]Department of Ophthalmology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
                [11 ]Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock
                [12 ]Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco
                [13 ]Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City
                [14 ]Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Neurosciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
                [15 ]Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
                [16 ]Department of Ophthalmology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Louisiana State University Eye Center, New Orleans
                [17 ]Ross Eye Institute, University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine, Buffalo, New York
                [18 ]Department of Ophthalmology, Dean McGee Eye Institute, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City
                [19 ]Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
                [20 ]Department of Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
                [21 ]Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
                [22 ]Gavin Herbert Eye Institute, University of California, Irvine
                [23 ]Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle
                [24 ]Department of Ophthalmology, Eugene and Marilyn Glick Eye Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
                [25 ]Department of Ophthalmology, New York University School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
                Article
                10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.2427
                6646997
                31318390
                0ebeb4d0-4f63-4731-95a7-43d39f171b2f
                © 2019
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article