1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Sensor-Based Build Condition Monitoring in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing Process Using a Spectral Graph Theoretic Approach

      1 , 2
      Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
      ASME International

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The goal of this work is to monitor the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process using an array of sensors so that a record may be made of those temporal and spatial build locations where there is a high probability of defect formation. In pursuit of this goal, a commercial LPBF machine at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) was integrated with three types of sensors, namely, a photodetector, high-speed visible camera, and short wave infrared (SWIR) thermal camera with the following objectives: (1) to develop and apply a spectral graph theoretic approach to monitor the LPBF build condition from the data acquired by the three sensors; (2) to compare results from the three different sensors in terms of their statistical fidelity in distinguishing between different build conditions. The first objective will lead to early identification of incipient defects from in-process sensor data. The second objective will ascertain the monitoring fidelity tradeoff involved in replacing an expensive sensor, such as a thermal camera, with a relatively inexpensive, low resolution sensor, e.g., a photodetector. As a first-step toward detection of defects and process irregularities that occur in practical LPBF scenarios, this work focuses on capturing and differentiating the distinctive thermal signatures that manifest in parts with overhang features. Overhang features can significantly decrease the ability of laser heat to diffuse from the heat source. This constrained heat flux may lead to issues such as poor surface finish, distortion, and microstructure inhomogeneity. In this work, experimental sensor data are acquired during LPBF of a simple test part having an overhang angle of 40.5 deg. Extracting and detecting the difference in sensor signatures for such a simple case is the first-step toward in situ defect detection in additive manufacturing (AM). The proposed approach uses the Eigen spectrum of the spectral graph Laplacian matrix as a derived signature from the three different sensors to discriminate the thermal history of overhang features from that of the bulk areas of the part. The statistical accuracy for isolating the thermal patterns belonging to bulk and overhang features in terms of the F-score is as follows: (a) F-score of 95% from the SWIR thermal camera signatures; (b) 83% with the high-speed visible camera; (c) 79% with the photodetector. In comparison, conventional signal analysis techniques—e.g., neural networks, support vector machines, linear discriminant analysis were evaluated with F-score in the range of 40–60%.

          Related collections

          Most cited references67

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Normalized cuts and image segmentation

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Laplacian Eigenmaps for Dimensionality Reduction and Data Representation

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Wavelets on graphs via spectral graph theory

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
                ASME International
                1087-1357
                1528-8935
                September 01 2018
                September 01 2018
                June 04 2018
                : 140
                : 9
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Mechanical and Materials Engineering Department, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588
                [2 ]Mechanical and Materials Engineering Department, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588 e-mail:
                Article
                10.1115/1.4040264
                0f13dddf-ba4f-4082-ae90-7992fff5bc52
                © 2018
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article