24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Stigma as a fundamental hindrance to the United States opioid overdose crisis response

      other

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Alexander Tsai and co-authors discuss the role of stigma in responses to the US opioid crisis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references161

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Stigma among health professionals towards patients with substance use disorders and its consequences for healthcare delivery: systematic review.

          Healthcare professionals are crucial in the identification and accessibility to treatment for people with substance use disorders. Our objective was to assess health professionals' attitudes towards patients with substance use disorders and examine the consequences of these attitudes on healthcare delivery for these patients in Western countries. Pubmed, PsycINFO and Embase were systematically searched for articles published between 2000 and 2011. Studies evaluating health professionals' attitudes towards patients with substance use disorders and consequences of negative attitudes were included. An inclusion criterion was that studies addressed alcohol or illicit drug abuse. Reviews, commentaries and letters were excluded, as were studies originating from non-Western countries. The search process yielded 1562 citations. After selection and quality assessment, 28 studies were included. Health professionals generally had a negative attitude towards patients with substance use disorders. They perceived violence, manipulation, and poor motivation as impeding factors in the healthcare delivery for these patients. Health professionals also lacked adequate education, training and support structures in working with this patient group. Negative attitudes of health professionals diminished patients' feelings of empowerment and subsequent treatment outcomes. Health professionals are less involved and have a more task-oriented approach in the delivery of healthcare, resulting in less personal engagement and diminished empathy. This review indicates that negative attitudes of health professionals towards patients with substance use disorders are common and contribute to suboptimal health care for these patients. However, few studies have evaluated the consequences of health professionals' negative attitudes towards patients with substance use disorders. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A Modified Labeling Theory Approach to Mental Disorders: An Empirical Assessment

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Understanding Labeling Effects in the Area of Mental Disorders: An Assessment of the Effects of Expectations of Rejection

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                PLoS Med
                PLoS Med
                plos
                plosmed
                PLoS Medicine
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1549-1277
                1549-1676
                26 November 2019
                November 2019
                : 16
                : 11
                : e1002969
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Center for Global Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
                [2 ] Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
                [3 ] Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
                [4 ] Center for Population Health Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America
                [5 ] Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
                [6 ] Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
                [7 ] Northeastern University School of Law, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
                [8 ] Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
                [9 ] Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California at San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California, United States of America
                [10 ] Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City, New York, United States of America
                [11 ] Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
                [12 ] Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
                [13 ] Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
                [14 ] Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
                Author notes

                The authors of this manuscript have read the journal's policy and have the following competing interests: ACT receives a stipend as a Specialty Consulting Editor for PLOS Medicine and serves on the journal’s Editorial Board. ACT and SS are Guest Editors for the PLOS Medicine Special Issue on Substance Use, Misuse and Dependence. MLB has been retained as an expert witness in litigation against opioid manufacturers. SEW has received research funding from Optum Labs for a study using Optum claims data to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of different treatment pathways for opioid use disorder.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6397-7917
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9198-150X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4884-6609
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0726-0676
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7724-691X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5475-2713
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7612-8903
                Article
                PMEDICINE-D-19-02372
                10.1371/journal.pmed.1002969
                6957118
                31770387
                0f2ce6ab-1963-4aab-9b55-cda7e0474792
                © 2019 Tsai et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Pages: 18
                Funding
                The authors received no specific funding for this work.
                Categories
                Policy Forum
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pharmacology
                Drugs
                Analgesics
                Opioids
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pain Management
                Analgesics
                Opioids
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pharmacology
                Drugs
                Opioids
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pharmaceutics
                Drug Therapy
                Social Sciences
                Political Science
                Public Policy
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Behavior
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Behavior
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Public and Occupational Health
                Behavioral and Social Aspects of Health
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Professions
                Medical Personnel
                Medical Doctors
                Physicians
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Care Providers
                Medical Doctors
                Physicians
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Public and Occupational Health
                Social Sciences
                Law and Legal Sciences
                Criminal Justice System
                Law Enforcement

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article