28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Competency-based (CanMEDS) residency training programme in radiology: systematic design procedure, curriculum and success factors

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Based on the CanMEDS framework and the European Training Charter for Clinical Radiology a new radiology curriculum was designed in the Netherlands. Both the development process and the resulting new curriculum are presented in this paper.

          Methods

          The new curriculum was developed according to four systematic design principles: discursiveness, hierarchical decomposition, systematic variation and satisficing (satisficing is different from satisfying; in this context, satisficing means searching for an acceptable solution instead of searching for an optimal solution).

          Results

          The new curriculum is organ based with integration of radiological diagnostic techniques, comprises a uniform national common trunk followed by a 2-year subspecialisation, is competency outcome based with appropriate assessment tools and techniques, and is based on regional collaboration among radiology departments.

          Discussion

          The application of the systematic design principles proved successful in producing a new curriculum approved by all authorities. The principles led to a structured, yet flexible, development process in which creative solutions could be generated and adopters (programme directors, supervisors and residents) were highly involved. Further research is needed to empirically test the components of the new curriculum.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Entrustability of professional activities and competency-based training.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The mini-CEX: a method for assessing clinical skills.

              To evaluate the mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX), which assesses the clinical skills of residents. Observational study and psychometric assessment of the mini-CEX. 21 internal medicine training programs. Data from 1228 mini-CEX encounters involving 421 residents and 316 evaluators. The encounters were assessed for the type of visit, sex and complexity of the patient, when the encounter occurred, length of the encounter, ratings provided, and the satisfaction of the examiners. Using this information, we determined the overall average ratings for residents in all categories, the reliability of the mini-CEX scores, and the effects of the characteristics of the patients and encounters. Interviewing skills, physical examination, professionalism, clinical judgment, counseling, organization and efficiency, and overall competence were evaluated. Residents were assessed in various clinical settings with a diverse set of patient problems. Residents received the lowest ratings in the physical examination and the highest ratings in professionalism. Comparisons over the first year of training showed statistically significant improvement in all aspects of competence, and the method generated reliable ratings. The measurement characteristics of the mini-CEX are similar to those of other performance assessments, such as standardized patients. Unlike these assessments, the difficulty of the examination will vary with the patients that a resident encounters. This effect is mitigated to a degree by the examiners, who slightly overcompensate for patient difficulty, and by the fact that each resident interacts with several patients. Furthermore, the mini-CEX has higher fidelity than these formats, permits evaluation based on a much broader set of clinical settings and patient problems, and is administered on site.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +31-50-3619702 , +31-50-3613606 , e.jippes@wenckebach.umcg.nl
                +31-50-3633830 , +31-50-3632330 , jovanengelen@mac.com
                +31-38-4245050 , +31-38-4247660 , p.l.p.brand@isala.nl
                +31-50-3614755 , +31-50-3611673 , m.oudkerk@rad.umcg.nl
                Journal
                Eur Radiol
                European Radiology
                Springer-Verlag (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0938-7994
                1432-1084
                3 October 2009
                3 October 2009
                April 2010
                : 20
                : 4
                : 967-977
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Postgraduate School of Medicine, Wenckebach Institute, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Postbus 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands
                [2 ]Product Development and Strategy, Faculty Economics and Business, University of Groningen, Nettelbosje 2, 9747 AE Groningen, the Netherlands
                [3 ]UMCG Postgraduate School of Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Postbus 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands
                [4 ]Amalia Children’s Clinic, Isala Klinieken Zwolle, Dokter van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB Zwolle, the Netherlands
                [5 ]Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Postbus 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands
                Article
                1623
                10.1007/s00330-009-1623-z
                2835633
                19802611
                0f371362-51a1-4066-ae40-a16b1b58c2d8
                © The Author(s) 2009
                History
                : 5 June 2009
                : 17 August 2009
                Categories
                Radiological Education
                Custom metadata
                © European Society of Radiology 2010

                Radiology & Imaging
                curriculum development,the netherlands,medical education,radiology education,systematic design procedures,diffusion of innovation

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content216

                Cited by4

                Most referenced authors275