25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Problem-Based Versus Conventional Curricula: Influence on Knowledge and Attitudes of Medical Students Towards Health Research

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Medical education curricula in developing countries should emphasize training in health research. This study compares the knowledge and attitudes towards health research between undergraduate medical students undertaking Problem Based Learning (PBL) versus conventional Lecture Based Learning (LBL).

          Methods

          Two groups comprising 66 (LBL) and 84 (PBL) 4 th and 5 th year students from the medical college of Aga Khan University were administered a structured and validated questionnaire. Knowledge and attitudes of the two groups were recorded on a scale (graduated in percentages) and compared for statistical difference.

          Results

          PBL students scored 54.0% while LBL students scored 55.5% on the knowledge scale [p-value; 0.63]. On the attitudes scale, PBL students scored 75.5% against a 66.7% score of LBL students [p-value; 0.021]. A higher proportion of PBL students (89%) had participated in research activities compared to LBL students (74%) and thus felt more confident in conducting research and writing a scientific paper.

          Conclusion

          The PBL students showed slightly healthier attitudes towards health research compared to LBL students. Both groups demonstrated a similar level of knowledge about health research. The positive impact of the PBL curriculum on attitudes of medical students towards health research may help in improving research output from developing countries in future.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Extracurricular research experience of medical students and their scientific output after graduation.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Knowledge and attitudes about health research amongst a group of Pakistani medical students

            Background Health research training is an important part of medical education. This study was conducted to assess the level of knowledge and attitudes regarding health research in a group of Pakistani medical students at Aga Khan University, Karachi. Methods It was a cross-sectional pilot study conducted among a group of Pakistani medical students. Through stratified random sampling, a pre-tested, structured and validated questionnaire was administered to 220 medical students. Knowledge and attitudes were recorded on a scale (graduated in percentages). Results Mean scores of students were 49.0% on knowledge scale and 53.7% on attitude scale. Both knowledge and attitudes improved significantly with increasing years of study in medical college [Regression coefficient 4.10 (p-value; 0.019) and 6.67 (p-value; < 0.001) for knowledge and attitudes, respectively]. Conclusion Medical students demonstrate moderate level of knowledge and attitude towards health research. Intensive training in this regard is associated with significant improvement in knowledge and attitudes of students towards health research.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Undergraduate medical education: comparison of problem-based learning and conventional teaching.

              To review the literature on studies comparing all aspects of problem-based learning with the conventional mode of teaching. Medline literature search (1980 through 1999) and the references cited in retrieved articles. Studies and meta-analyses that compared the newer problem-based learning curriculum and the conventional lecture-based mode of teaching undergraduate medical students. Areas of comparison included the academic process; programme evaluation; academic achievement; graduates' performance, specialty choices, and practice characteristics; and the attitude of students and teachers towards the programmes. Data were extracted independently by multiple authors. Students of the problem-based learning curriculum found learning to be "more stimulating and more humane" and "engaging, difficult, and useful", whereas students of the conventional curriculum found learning to be "non-relevant, passive, and boring". Students who used the problem-based learning method showed better interpersonal skills and psychosocial knowledge, as well as a better attitude towards patients. Students using the conventional model, however, performed better in basic science examinations. Teachers tended to enjoy teaching the newer curriculum. Although the two curricula encourage different ways of learning, there is no convincing evidence of improved learning using the problem-based learning curriculum. A combination of both the conventional and newer curricula may provide the most effective training for undergraduate medical students.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2007
                18 July 2007
                : 2
                : 7
                : e632
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Medical College, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
                [2 ]Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
                London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Peru
                Author notes
                * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: drhasankhan@ 123456gmail.com

                Conceived and designed the experiments: HK MK. Performed the experiments: HK AT. Analyzed the data: HK AT MK. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: HK. Wrote the paper: HK AT ZF.

                Article
                07-PONE-RA-01263R2
                10.1371/journal.pone.0000632
                1913552
                17637847
                0f8c000f-4e4e-423f-b471-06d68262095c
                Khan et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
                History
                : 10 May 2007
                : 20 June 2007
                Page count
                Pages: 4
                Categories
                Research Article
                Evidence-Based Healthcare/Health Services Research and Economics
                Non-Clinical Medicine/Medical Education

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article