12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Anatomy of Inference: Generative Models and Brain Structure

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To infer the causes of its sensations, the brain must call on a generative (predictive) model. This necessitates passing local messages between populations of neurons to update beliefs about hidden variables in the world beyond its sensory samples. It also entails inferences about how we will act. Active inference is a principled framework that frames perception and action as approximate Bayesian inference. This has been successful in accounting for a wide range of physiological and behavioral phenomena. Recently, a process theory has emerged that attempts to relate inferences to their neurobiological substrates. In this paper, we review and develop the anatomical aspects of this process theory. We argue that the form of the generative models required for inference constrains the way in which brain regions connect to one another. Specifically, neuronal populations representing beliefs about a variable must receive input from populations representing the Markov blanket of that variable. We illustrate this idea in four different domains: perception, planning, attention, and movement. In doing so, we attempt to show how appealing to generative models enables us to account for anatomical brain architectures. Ultimately, committing to an anatomical theory of inference ensures we can form empirical hypotheses that can be tested using neuroimaging, neuropsychological, and electrophysiological experiments.

          Related collections

          Most cited references246

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects.

          We describe a model of visual processing in which feedback connections from a higher- to a lower-order visual cortical area carry predictions of lower-level neural activities, whereas the feedforward connections carry the residual errors between the predictions and the actual lower-level activities. When exposed to natural images, a hierarchical network of model neurons implementing such a model developed simple-cell-like receptive fields. A subset of neurons responsible for carrying the residual errors showed endstopping and other extra-classical receptive-field effects. These results suggest that rather than being exclusively feedforward phenomena, nonclassical surround effects in the visual cortex may also result from cortico-cortical feedback as a consequence of the visual system using an efficient hierarchical strategy for encoding natural images.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance.

            Historically, the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine (LC-NE) system has been implicated in arousal, but recent findings suggest that this system plays a more complex and specific role in the control of behavior than investigators previously thought. We review neurophysiological and modeling studies in monkey that support a new theory of LC-NE function. LC neurons exhibit two modes of activity, phasic and tonic. Phasic LC activation is driven by the outcome of task-related decision processes and is proposed to facilitate ensuing behaviors and to help optimize task performance (exploitation). When utility in the task wanes, LC neurons exhibit a tonic activity mode, associated with disengagement from the current task and a search for alternative behaviors (exploration). Monkey LC receives prominent, direct inputs from the anterior cingulate (ACC) and orbitofrontal cortices (OFC), both of which are thought to monitor task-related utility. We propose that these frontal areas produce the above patterns of LC activity to optimize utility on both short and long timescales.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Cellular basis of working memory

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Comput Neurosci
                Front Comput Neurosci
                Front. Comput. Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1662-5188
                13 November 2018
                2018
                : 12
                : 90
                Affiliations
                Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London , London, United Kingdom
                Author notes

                Edited by: Yilei Zhang, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

                Reviewed by: Jamie Sleigh, University of Auckland, New Zealand; Gopikrishna Deshpande, Auburn University, United States; Adam Ponzi, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Japan; Jan Lauwereyns, Kyushu University, Japan

                *Correspondence: Thomas Parr thomas.parr.12@ 123456ucl.ac.uk
                Article
                10.3389/fncom.2018.00090
                6243103
                30483088
                0f97f398-20df-4663-bb3e-bf43ee7721f5
                Copyright © 2018 Parr and Friston.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 24 August 2018
                : 25 October 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 11, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 222, Pages: 23, Words: 19235
                Funding
                Funded by: Rosetrees Trust 10.13039/501100000833
                Award ID: 173346
                Funded by: Wellcome Trust 10.13039/100004440
                Award ID: 088130/Z/09/Z
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Review

                Neurosciences
                bayesian,neuroanatomy,active inference,generative model,message passing,predictive processing

                Comments

                Comment on this article