15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares

          The flagship journal of the Society for Endocrinology. Learn more

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Pheochromocytoma due to a novel SDHD variant presenting as unilateral visual loss

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Summary

          A 53-year-old female presented to a tertiary ophthalmology referral centre complaining of unilateral painless loss of vision. Subsequent assessment revealed malignant hypertension causing right-sided cystoid macular oedema. During the course of secondary hypertension workup, she was diagnosed with a 7.8 cm phaeochromocytoma which was resected. Testing for a panel of all predisposing phaeochromocytoma-causing variants using next-generation sequencing resulted in the diagnosis of a novel SDHD variant.

          Learning points
          • Screening for secondary causes of hypertension is indicated when there is evidence of hypertension-mediated end-organ damage ( 1).

          • Testing for a predisposing variant should be considered in all patients with phaeochromocytoma or paraganglioma due to the high heritability rate and prevalence of somatic variants ( 2, 3, 4).

          • Novel variants are commonly uncovered in the Succinate Dehydrogenase (SDH) subunit; proving pathogenicity is a complex, time-consuming process and one challenge of next-generation sequencing ( 3).

          • SDHB immunohistochemistry as a tool for demonstrating pathogenicity is associated with reduced sensitivity when assessing SDHD variants ( 5, 6).

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation of Sequence Variants: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology

          The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) previously developed guidance for the interpretation of sequence variants. 1 In the past decade, sequencing technology has evolved rapidly with the advent of high-throughput next generation sequencing. By adopting and leveraging next generation sequencing, clinical laboratories are now performing an ever increasing catalogue of genetic testing spanning genotyping, single genes, gene panels, exomes, genomes, transcriptomes and epigenetic assays for genetic disorders. By virtue of increased complexity, this paradigm shift in genetic testing has been accompanied by new challenges in sequence interpretation. In this context, the ACMG convened a workgroup in 2013 comprised of representatives from the ACMG, the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) and the College of American Pathologists (CAP) to revisit and revise the standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants. The group consisted of clinical laboratory directors and clinicians. This report represents expert opinion of the workgroup with input from ACMG, AMP and CAP stakeholders. These recommendations primarily apply to the breadth of genetic tests used in clinical laboratories including genotyping, single genes, panels, exomes and genomes. This report recommends the use of specific standard terminology: ‘pathogenic’, ‘likely pathogenic’, ‘uncertain significance’, ‘likely benign’, and ‘benign’ to describe variants identified in Mendelian disorders. Moreover, this recommendation describes a process for classification of variants into these five categories based on criteria using typical types of variant evidence (e.g. population data, computational data, functional data, segregation data, etc.). Because of the increased complexity of analysis and interpretation of clinical genetic testing described in this report, the ACMG strongly recommends that clinical molecular genetic testing should be performed in a CLIA-approved laboratory with results interpreted by a board-certified clinical molecular geneticist or molecular genetic pathologist or equivalent.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline.

            The aim was to formulate clinical practice guidelines for pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL).
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Tumour risks and genotype–phenotype correlations associated with germline variants in succinate dehydrogenase subunit genes SDHB , SDHC and SDHD

              Background Germline pathogenic variants in SDHB/SDHC/SDHD are the most frequent causes of inherited phaeochromocytomas/paragangliomas. Insufficient information regarding penetrance and phenotypic variability hinders optimum management of mutation carriers. We estimate penetrance for symptomatic tumours and elucidate genotype–phenotype correlations in a large cohort of SDHB/SDHC/SDHD mutation carriers. Methods A retrospective survey of 1832 individuals referred for genetic testing due to a personal or family history of phaeochromocytoma/paraganglioma. 876 patients (401 previously reported) had a germline mutation in SDHB/SDHC/SDHD (n=673/43/160). Tumour risks were correlated with in silico structural prediction analyses. Results Tumour risks analysis provided novel penetrance estimates and genotype–phenotype correlations. In addition to tumour type susceptibility differences for individual genes, we confirmed that the SDHD:p.Pro81Leu mutation has a distinct phenotype and identified increased age-related tumour risks with highly destabilising SDHB missense mutations. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, the penetrance (cumulative risk of clinically apparent tumours) in SDHB and (paternally inherited) SDHD mutation-positive non-probands (n=371/67 with detailed clinical information) by age 60 years was 21.8% (95% CI 15.2% to 27.9%) and 43.2% (95% CI 25.4% to 56.7%), respectively. Risk of malignant disease at age 60 years in non-proband SDHB mutation carriers was 4.2%(95% CI 1.1% to 7.2%). With retrospective cohort analysis to adjust for ascertainment, cumulative tumour risks for SDHB mutation carriers at ages 60 years and 80 years were 23.9% (95% CI 20.9% to 27.4%) and 30.6% (95% CI 26.8% to 34.7%). Conclusions Overall risks of clinically apparent tumours for SDHB mutation carriers are substantially lower than initially estimated and will improve counselling of affected families. Specific genotype–tumour risk associations provides a basis for novel investigative strategies into succinate dehydrogenase-related mechanisms of tumourigenesis and the development of personalised management for SDHB/SDHC/SDHD mutation carriers.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep
                Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep
                EDM
                Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Case Reports
                Bioscientifica Ltd (Bristol )
                2052-0573
                02 November 2021
                2021
                : 2021
                : 21-0107
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Endocrinology , St. James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
                [2 ]Department of Surgery , St. James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
                [3 ]Department of Histopathology , St. James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
                [4 ]Department of Ophthalmopathy , Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
                Author notes
                Correspondence should be addressed to C Miller; Email: clarem4@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                EDM-21-0107
                10.1530/EDM-21-0107
                8686172
                34866059
                0fe429c6-6c6d-4a48-a866-23a4112b5d92
                © The authors

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License..

                History
                : 11 October 2021
                : 02 November 2021
                Categories
                Adult
                Female
                Black - African
                Ireland
                Adrenal
                Adrenal
                Genetics
                New Disease or Syndrome: Presentations/Diagnosis/Management
                New Disease or Syndrome: Presentations/Diagnosis/Management

                adult,female,black - african,ireland,adrenal,genetics,new disease or syndrome: presentations/diagnosis/management,december,2021

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log