9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Retrograde migration of a vesicoureteric junction calculus: A potential pitfall of the noncontrast limited pelvic computerized tomography

      case-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Retrograde ureteric calculus migration is a rare phenomenon. Herein, we report two such cases where each patient presented with a calculus, measured at 5 mm and 6 mm, respectively, at the vesicoureteric junction (VUJ) on noncontrast computerized tomography kidneys, ureters, and bladder (CTKUB). Following acute presentation with renal colic, each patient opted for conservative management of their ureteric stone and became asymptomatic when undergoing their follow-up imaging. The first patient underwent a follow-up noncontrast limited pelvic computerized tomography (CT) where it had appeared that the radiolucent VUJ calculus had passed. This stone was then discovered incidentally 3 months later in the upper ureter when the patient had undergone a CT colonography. The other patient underwent a follow-up X-ray KUB where the stone was shown to have migrated to the lower renal pole calyx which was confirmed with noncontrast CTKUB imaging. In all reported cases of retrograde VUJ calculus migration, the use of a noncontrast limited pelvic CT scan either missed or would have missed this phenomenon. This potential pitfall of the noncontrast limited pelvic CT scan should be appreciated and the use of full upper renal tract imaging should be considered for the follow-up of radiolucent VUJ calculus cases whereby there is no clear history of calculus passage.

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Spontaneous retrograde movement of ureteroliths in two dogs and five cats.

          2 dogs and 5 cats were evaluated for treatment of ureteroliths.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Spontaneous retrograde migration of ureterovesical junction stone to the kidney; first ever reported case in the English literature in human

            We present a case of spontaneous retrograde migration of ureterovesical junction stone to the kidney. A 26-year-old Bahraini male, diagnosed with left lower ureteric stone 7 months before this presentation. On his recent presentation, the stone has migrated down but not passed, confirmed on imaging. Operative removal was planned. X-ray kidney ureter bladder (KUB) in the morning of surgery did not reveal stone in the ureter, but the same shadow was seen in the kidney. An urgent computerized tomography-KUB was done, and this confirms the stone has migrated to the kidney. Surgery was canceled, and the stone was dealt with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and was fragmented in the first session. This retrograde migration of lower ureteric stone to the kidney is not reported in the English literature in human before.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Renal colic and childbirth pain: female experience versus male perception

              Introduction Renal colic is often described by patients as the worst pain ever experienced.1 Pain during childbirth is also similarly described.2 To date, no study has comparatively evaluated the pain of renal colic to that of childbirth in female patients who have experienced both. Furthermore, no such study has evaluated the perception that men with renal colic have with respect to the pain experienced during childbirth. Here we present our cross-sectional observational study to address these questions. The primary objectives of our study were to answer these questions and highlight the severity of renal colic which is not always faced and treated aggressively. Materials and methods Fifty-nine patients across two centers (Rotherham General Hospital, UK and Chesterfield Royal Hospital, UK) were asked to complete a visual analog scale questionnaire to assess the severity of their renal colic (minimum: 1, maximum: 10). All patients had confirmed ureteric stones on CT imaging and were asked if their renal colic was the most painful condition they have ever suffered. All primiparas and multiparas females were asked if their renal colic was more painful than childbirth. All men were asked to provide an opinion on what they imagined would be more painful – their renal colic or the pain associated with childbirth. The study gained ethical approval from Chesterfield Royal Hospital Research and Ethics Department. All patients provided written consent to in order to participate in the study. Results Thirty-six male and 23 female patients fully completed the questionnaire with age, stone size, and numerical pain rating score recorded (Table 1). There were no statistically significant differences in these parameters between male and female patients (p>0.05, Student’s t-test). From the male cohort of patients, 88.9% (n=32) stated that it was the worst pain they had ever experienced and for the female cohort this was 78.2% (n=19). From the female cohort of patients, 19 had given birth previously with 63.3% (n=12) saying that renal colic was more painful and a further 15.7% (n=3) felt that the intensity of pain was similar. Twenty-one percent of (n=4) female patients who had experienced both childbirth and renal colic stated that childbirth was a more painful experience. In contrast, the majority of male patients imagined that the pain from their renal colic was less painful (40%) or comparable (23.4%) to that of childbirth. Discussion The results of our study suggest that renal colic was the worst pain for the majority of female patients who have experienced both forms of pain. In contrast, 63.4% of men imagined that the pain of childbirth is worse or as severe as that from their renal colic. Renal colic should be managed by a swift stepwise and progressive analgesia regime. Pain associated with childbirth is well recognized and follows involvement of the pain team or anesthetist in pain control during labor. In contrast, renal colic pain is managed generally in the acute setting by either emergency care practitioners or the urologist. Optimal pain management in renal colic patients in the shortest possible time is vital as this group can on occasion be left with inadequate analgesia for lack of understanding of the intensity pain.3 Our study has several limitations. They include limitations in numbers with only 19 women who experienced both renal colic and childbirth. We assessed labor pain retrospectively which will include an element of recall bias. Further work could potentially include assessing female patients in their acute pain phase of labor and who have experienced renal colic pain prior to childbirth. To conclude, our study underlines and highlights the urgency and importance required when administering effective analgesia for female and male patients presenting with renal colic as that would be expected from those experiencing childbirth.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Urol Ann
                Urol Ann
                UA
                Urology Annals
                Wolters Kluwer - Medknow (India )
                0974-7796
                0974-7834
                Jan-Mar 2021
                19 January 2021
                : 13
                : 1
                : 80-82
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Urology, Buckinghamshire NHS Trust, Wycombe Hospital, Wycombe, UK
                [1 ]Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
                [2 ]Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Dr. Saiful Miah, Department of Urology, Buckinghamshire NHS Trust, Wycombe Hospital, High Wycombe, Queen Alexandra Road, HP11 2TT, United Kingdom. E-mail: saiful.miah@ 123456nhs.net
                Article
                UA-13-80
                10.4103/UA.UA_25_20
                8052898
                33897171
                1005cf4f-3ca0-4bbf-aeee-1453f4579cd1
                Copyright: © 2021 Urology Annals

                This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

                History
                : 10 March 2020
                : 16 August 2020
                Categories
                Case Report

                Urology
                noncontrast limited pelvic computerized tomography scan,renal colic,ureteric stone,urolithiasis

                Comments

                Comment on this article