28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Elide me bare : Null arguments in American Sign Language

      Natural Language & Linguistic Theory
      Springer Nature

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In this paper, I argue that the traditional analysis of null arguments—subjects and objects—in American Sign Language needs to be re-evaluated. It is typically assumed that in the absence of agreement, the null argument is either a topic-bound variable or a silent pronoun (pro). I introduce novel data that pose a problem for both of these views. As the null argument is subjected to a variety of diagnostics, I demonstrate that it is best analyzed as a case of ellipsis of a non-branching argument of the verb—a bare NP.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A familiar definite article in Akan

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book Chapter: not found

            Types of Lexical Information

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Impersonal indexicals: one, you, man, and du

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Natural Language & Linguistic Theory
                Nat Lang Linguist Theory
                Springer Nature
                0167-806X
                1573-0859
                May 2017
                October 2016
                : 35
                : 2
                : 397-446
                Article
                10.1007/s11049-016-9349-5
                10062efd-9218-4a05-a2a4-45760fdd39b9
                © 2017
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article