32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Researching Parental Socialization Styles across Three Cultural Contexts: Scale ESPA29 Bi-Dimensional Validity in Spain, Portugal, and Brazil

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Recent research that relates parenting with adolescent adjustment has shown the importance of considering the cultural context of the relationship. New results are emerging when considering the classical four-typologies model of parental socialization in some European and South-American countries. Among the instruments used in this emergent research is the Parental Socialization Scale ESPA29. This scale is a bi-dimensional parenting instrument that was specifically developed to measure the four parenting typologies, through the dimensions of acceptance/involvement and strictness/imposition. This study examines the good fit of the orthogonal bi-factor model based on the ESPA29 versus one-dimensional and bi-dimensional oblique alternative models, with three adolescent samples from 12 to 17 years old (53.4% girls), from Spain ( N = 826), Portugal ( N = 752), and Brazil ( N = 628). We applied structural equation models (SEMs) to analyze the fit of the models to the data. The results confirm a better fit to the data for the orthogonal bi-factor model versus one-dimensional and bi-dimensional oblique alternative models across country, adolescent sex, and the three age groups. Additionally, the convergent validity of the scale was proved by showing the relation of the two parenting dimensions with self-concept. The results guarantee the adequacy of the ESPA29 to measure parenting styles.

          Related collections

          Most cited references62

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Patterns of competence and adjustment among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful families.

          In order to test Maccoby and Martin's revision of Baumrind's conceptual framework, the families of approximately 4,100 14-18-year-olds were classified into 1 of 4 groups (authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, or neglectful) on the basis of the adolescents' ratings of their parents on 2 dimensions: acceptance/involvement and strictness/supervision. The youngsters were then contrasted along 4 sets of outcomes: psychosocial development, school achievement, internalized distress, and problem behavior. Results indicate that adolescents who characterize their parents as authoritative score highest on measures of psychosocial competence and lowest on measures of psychological and behavioral dysfunction; the reverse is true for adolescents who describe their parents as neglectful. Adolescents whose parents are characterized as authoritarian score reasonably well on measures indexing obedience and conformity to the standards of adults but have relatively poorer self-conceptions than other youngsters. In contrast, adolescents from indulgent homes evidence a strong sense of self-confidence but report a higher frequency of substance abuse and school misconduct and are less engaged in school. The results provide support for Maccoby and Martin's framework and indicate the need to distinguish between two types of "permissive" families: those that are indulgent and those that are neglectful.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Over-time changes in adjustment and competence among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful families.

            In a previous report, we demonstrated that adolescents' adjustment varies as a function of their parents' style (e.g., authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, neglectful). This 1-year follow-up was conducted in order to examine whether the observed differences are maintained over time. In 1987, an ethnically and socioeconomically heterogeneous sample of approximately 2,300 14-18-year-olds provided information used to classify the adolescents' families into 1 of 4 parenting style groups. That year, and again 1 year later, the students completed a battery of standardized instruments tapping psychosocial development, school achievement, internalized distress, and behavior problems. Differences in adjustment associated with variations in parenting are either maintained or increase over time. However, whereas the benefits of authoritative parenting are largely in the maintenance of previous levels of high adjustment, the deleterious consequences of neglectful parenting continue to accumulate.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Child care practices anteceding three patterns of preschool behavior.

              D Baumrind (1967)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                11 January 2019
                January 2019
                : 16
                : 2
                : 197
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychology, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Avda de los Alfares 44, 16071 Cuenca, Spain
                [2 ]Department of Methodology of the Behavioral Sciences, University of Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibanez, 21, 46010 Valencia, Spain; fernando.garcia@ 123456uv.es (F.G.); m.castillo.fuentes@ 123456uv.es (M.C.F.)
                [3 ]Instituto de Educação, Universidade de Lisboa, Alameda da Universidade, 1649-013 Lisboa, Portugal; fhveiga@ 123456ie.ulisboa.pt (F.V.); yaraiglesia@ 123456gmail.com (Y.R.)
                [4 ]Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, University of Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibanez, 21, 46010 Valencia, Spain; oscar.f.garcia@ 123456uv.es (O.F.G.); emilia.serra@ 123456uv.es (E.S.)
                [5 ]Department of Business Administration, University of Trier, Universitätsring 15, D-54296 Trier, Germany; edie.cruise@ 123456gmail.com
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: misabel.martinez@ 123456uclm.es ; Tel.: +34-96-917-9100
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9524-8022
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3953-8364
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4109-4950
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2977-6238
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8146-7590
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0407-3322
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8669-5066
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2604-2853
                Article
                ijerph-16-00197
                10.3390/ijerph16020197
                6352253
                30641982
                1020d6c1-0760-41c2-82c0-38a53af6b28f
                © 2019 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 02 December 2018
                : 07 January 2019
                Categories
                Article

                Public health
                parenting styles,parental warmth and strictness,adolescents,factorial invariance,multi-group analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article