25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Participatory definition of breeding objectives for sheep breeds under pastoral systems—the case of Red Maasai and Dorper sheep in Kenya

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Crossing local breeds with exotic breeds may be an option for increased livestock productivity. However, there is a risk for endangerment of the local breeds. One such case is in Kenya where the imported Dorper breed is used for crossbreeding with Red Maasai sheep. The aim of this study was to investigate farmers’ trait preferences as a basis for determination of breeding objectives for Red Maasai and Dorper sheep at two sites, Amboseli and Isinya, in Kenya. Within their own flock, each farmer identified three ewes representing the best, average and poorest within each breed group: Red Maasai, Dorper and Crosses. Farmers gave reasons for their ranking. Body measurements and weights were also taken. At the harshest site, Amboseli, differences between breed groups in body weight were small and breeds were equally preferred. In Isinya, where environmental conditions are better and farmers are more market oriented, Dorper and Crosses had significantly higher body weights and market prices and were thus preferred by the farmers. Red Maasai were preferred for their maternal and adaptive traits. Breeding objectives should emphasize growth traits and milk production in both breeds at both sites. Body condition needs to be specifically considered in the breeding objectives for sheep in Amboseli, whereas adaptive traits need to be generally emphasized in Dorper.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Small ruminant production in smallholder and pastoral/extensive farming systems in Kenya

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Community-based livestock breeding programmes: essentials and examples.

            Breeding programmes described as community-based (CBBP) typically relate to low-input systems with farmers having a common interest to improve and share their genetic resources. CBBPs are more frequent with keepers of small ruminants, in particular smallholders of local breeds, than with cattle, pigs or chickens with which farmers may have easier access to alternative programmes. Constraints that limit the adoption of conventional breeding technologies in low-input systems cover a range of organizational and technical aspects. The analysis of 8 CBBPs located in countries of Latin-America, Africa and Asia highlights the importance of bottom-up approaches and involvement of local institutions in the planning and implementation stages. The analysis also reveals a high dependence of these programmes on organizational, technical and financial support. Completely self-sustained CBBPs seem to be difficult to realize. There is a need to implement and document formal socio-economic evaluations of CBBPs to provide governments and other development agencies with the information necessary for creating sustainable CBBPs at larger scales.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Important aspects and limitations in considering community-based breeding programs for low-input smallholder livestock systems

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +46-18 67 21 61 , emelie.zonabend@slu.se
                Journal
                Trop Anim Health Prod
                Trop Anim Health Prod
                Tropical Animal Health and Production
                Springer Netherlands (Dordrecht )
                0049-4747
                1573-7438
                15 September 2015
                15 September 2015
                2016
                : 48
                : 9-20
                Affiliations
                [ ]Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7023, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
                [ ]International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
                Article
                911
                10.1007/s11250-015-0911-7
                4710656
                26374208
                106a5a11-6c9e-4951-9688-75090bbfece7
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 4 June 2015
                : 1 September 2015
                Categories
                Regular Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

                Animal science & Zoology
                participatory approach,livestock farmers,breeding goals,crossbreeding,endangered breed

                Comments

                Comment on this article