17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Embedding an Evidence-Based Model for Suicide Prevention in the National Health Service: A Service Improvement Initiative

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Despite the improved understanding of the determinants of suicide over recent decades, the mean suicide rate within the United Kingdom (UK) has remained at 10 per 100,000 per annum, with about 28% accessing mental health services in the 12 months prior to death. In this paper, we outlined a novel systems-level approach to tackling this problem through objectively differentiating the level of severity for each suicide risk presentation and providing fast-track pathways to care for all, including life-threatening cases. An additional operational challenge addressed within the proposed model was the saturation of local crisis mental health services with approximately 150 suicidality referrals per month, including non-mental health cases. This paper discussed a service improvement initiative undertaken within a National Health Service (NHS) secondary care mental health provider’s open-access 24/7 crisis and home treatment service. An organisation-wide bespoke “suicide risk triage” system utilising the Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS) was implemented across all services. The preliminary impacts on suicidality, suicide rates and service user outcomes were described.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          How Many People Are Exposed to Suicide? Not Six

          It has long been stated that six people are left behind following every suicide. Despite a lack of empirical evidence, this has been extensively cited for over 30 years. Using data from a random-digit dial survey, a more accurate number of people exposed to each suicide is calculated. A sample of 1,736 adults included 812 lifetime suicide-exposed respondents who reported age and number of exposures. Each suicide resulted in 135 people exposed (knew the person). Each suicide affects a large circle of people, who may be in need of clinician services or support following exposure.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Reflections on Suicidal Ideation

              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Exposure to Suicide in the Community: Prevalence and Correlates in One U.S. State.

              Suicide has been identified as a major public health issue. Exposure to suicide (i.e., knowing someone who died by suicide) is far more pervasive than previously considered and might be associated with significant adverse outcomes. As suicide becomes more commonly discussed in the public arena, a compelling need exists to determine who is exposed to suicide and how this exposure affects those left behind. This study estimated the proportion of the population exposed to suicide and delineated factors that predict significant psychiatric and psychosocial morbidity following that exposure.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                08 July 2020
                July 2020
                : 17
                : 14
                : 4920
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK; S.Brown@ 1234562017.hull.ac.uk (S.B.); f.burbidge@ 123456hull.ac.uk (F.B.)
                [2 ]NAViGO Health and Social Care Community Interest Company, Grimsby DN32 0QE, UK; aamer.sajjad1@ 123456nhs.net (A.S.); michael.reeve@ 123456nhs.net (M.R.); vicky.ayres@ 123456nhs.net (V.A.); richard.melling@ 123456nhs.net (R.M.)
                [3 ]Department of Psychology, School of Arts and Sciences, Clinical Psychology Faculty, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 20064, USA; jobes@ 123456cua.edu
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: z.iqbal1@ 123456nhs.net ; Tel.: +44-1472-806800
                Article
                ijerph-17-04920
                10.3390/ijerph17144920
                7399800
                32650466
                106d0870-c6b9-485d-8c4d-cf62f1a98174
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 01 June 2020
                : 06 July 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Public health
                suicide prevention,suicidality,cams,service improvement,service model
                Public health
                suicide prevention, suicidality, cams, service improvement, service model

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log
                scite_

                Similar content45

                Cited by4

                Most referenced authors307