13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Salivary Gland Tumor Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology: A Proposal for a Risk Stratification Classification

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S1"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d11116117e163">Objectives</h5> <p id="P1">Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is useful in the evaluation of salivary gland tumors, but currently no standard terminology or risk stratification model exists. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S2"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d11116117e168">Methods</h5> <p id="P2">FNA smears were reviewed and categorized based on cytonuclear features, stromal characteristics, and background characteristics. Risk of malignancy was calculated for each category. Classifications as benign, neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (NUMP), suspicious for malignancy, and positive for malignancy were used to aggregate categories into similar risk groups. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S3"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d11116117e173">Results</h5> <p id="P3">Categorization of salivary gland aspirates into morphologic categories resulted in the expected risk stratification. Grouping of categories maintained risk stratification, providing classes with malignancy risk as follows: benign, 2%; NUMP, 18%; suspicious for malignancy, 76%; and positive for malignancy, 100%. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S4"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d11116117e178">Conclusions</h5> <p id="P4">Salivary gland FNA categorization into commonly encountered morphologic categories provides risk stratification, which translates to a simplified classification scheme of benign, NUMP, suspicious, and positive for malignancy similar to the paradigm in other organ systems. </p> </div>

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          American Journal of Clinical Pathology
          American Journal of Clinical Pathology
          American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP)
          0002-9173
          1943-7722
          May 13 2015
          May 13 2015
          : 143
          : 6
          : 839-853
          Article
          10.1309/AJCPMII6OSD2HSJA
          5257286
          25972326
          106d6234-5a46-4477-b8cc-69d327ef0f40
          © 2015
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article