0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Consensus‐based clinical guidelines for ambulatory electromyography and contingent electrical stimulation in sleep bruxism

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          As yet, there are still no evidence‐based clinical diagnostic and management guidelines for ambulatory single‐channel EMG devices, like the BUTLER ® GrindCare ® (GrindCare), that are used in patients with sleep bruxism. Therefore, a consensus meeting was organised with GrindCare developers, researchers, and academic and non‐academic clinicians experienced with the use of ambulatory EMG devices. The aim of the meeting was to discuss and develop recommendations for clinical guidelines for GrindCare usage, based on the existing clinical and research experience of the consensus meeting's participants. As an important outcome of the consensus meeting, clinical guidelines were proposed in which an initial 2‐week baseline phase with the device in its inactive (non‐stimulus) mode for habituation and assessment of the number of jaw‐muscle activities is followed by a 4‐week active phase with contingent electrical stimuli suppressing the jaw‐muscle activities. As to avoid the commonly reported reduction in sensitivity to the stimuli, a 2‐week inactive phase is subsequently installed, followed by a repetition of active and inactive phases until a lasting reduction in the number of jaw‐muscle activities and/or associated complaints has been achieved. This proposal has the characteristics of a single‐patient clinical trial. From a research point of view, adoption of this approach by large numbers of GrindCare users creates a great opportunity to recruit relatively large numbers of study participants that follow the same protocol.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Is bruxism a disorder or a behaviour? Rethinking the international consensus on defining and grading of bruxism

          Inspired by the international consensus on defining and grading of bruxism (Lobbezoo F, Ahlberg J, Glaros AG, Kato T, Koyano K, Lavigne GJ et al. J Oral Rehabil. 2013;40:2), this commentary examines its contribution and underlying assumptions for defining sleep bruxism (SB). The consensus’ parsimonious redefinition of bruxism as a behaviour is an advance, but we explore an implied question: might SB be more than behaviour? Behaviours do not inherently require clinical treatment, making the consensus-proposed ‘diagnostic grading system’ inappropriate. However, diagnostic grading might be useful, if SB were considered a disorder. Therefore, to fully appreciate the contribution of the consensus statement, we first consider standards and evidence for determining whether SB is a disorder characterised by harmful dysfunction or a risk factor increasing probability of a disorder. Second, the strengths and weaknesses of the consensus statement’s proposed ‘diagnostic grading system’ are examined. The strongest evidence-to-date does not support SB as disorder as implied by ‘diagnosis’. Behaviour alone is not diagnosed; disorders are. Considered even as a grading system of behaviour, the proposed system is weakened by poor sensitivity of self-report for direct polysomnographic (PSG)-classified SB and poor associations between clinical judgments of SB and portable PSG; reliance on dichotomised reports; and failure to consider SB behaviour on a continuum, measurable and definable through valid behavioural observation. To date, evidence for validity of self-report or clinician report in placing SB behaviour on a continuum is lacking, raising concerns about their potential utility in any bruxism behavioural grading system, and handicapping future study of whether SB may be a useful risk factor for, or itself a disorder requiring treatment.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Diagnostic accuracy of portable instrumental devices to measure sleep bruxism: a systematic literature review of polysomnographic studies.

            This study systematically reviews the sleep bruxism (SB) literature published in the MEDLINE and Scopus databases to answer the following question: What is the validity of the different portable instrumental devices that have been proposed to measure SB if compared with polysomnographic (PSG) recordings assumed as the gold standard? Four clinical studies on humans, assessing the diagnostic accuracy of portable instrumental approaches (i.e. Bitestrip, electromyography (EMG)-telemetry recordings and Bruxoff) with respect to PSG, were included in the review. Methodological shortcomings were identified by QUADAS-2 quality assessment. Findings showed contrasting results and supported only in part the validity of the described diagnostic devices with respect to PSG. The positive predictive value (PPV) of the Bitestrip device was 59-100%, with a sensitivity of 71-84·2%, whilst EMG-telemetry recordings had an unacceptable rate of false-positive findings (76·9%), counterbalanced by an almost perfect sensitivity (98·8%). The Bruxoff device had the highest accuracy values, showing an excellent agreement with PSG for both manual (area under ROC = 0·98) and automatic scoring (0·96) options as well as for the simultaneous recording of events with respect to PSG (0·89-0·91). It can be concluded that the available information on the validity of portable instrumental diagnostic approaches with respect to PSG recordings is still scarce and not solid enough to support any non-PSG technique's employ as a stand-alone diagnostic method in the research setting, with the possible exception of the Bruxoff device that needs to be further confirmed with future investigations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Agreement of the International Classification of Sleep Disorders Criteria with polysomnography for sleep bruxism diagnosis: A preliminary study

              Validated questionnaires and guidelines for assessing sleep bruxism (SB) that can be administered by dentists in clinical practice are still lacking.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                f.lobbezoo@acta.nl
                Journal
                J Oral Rehabil
                J Oral Rehabil
                10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842
                JOOR
                Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0305-182X
                1365-2842
                11 September 2019
                February 2020
                : 47
                : 2 ( doiID: 10.1111/joor.v47.2 )
                : 164-169
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Orofacial Pain and Dysfunction Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA) University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
                [ 2 ] CMD‐Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
                [ 3 ] Department of Prosthetic Dentistry School of Dental Medicine University Medical Centre Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
                [ 4 ] Section of Orofacial Pain and Jaw Function Department of Dentistry and Oral Health Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark
                [ 5 ] Scandinavian Center for Orofacial Neurosciences Aarhus Denmark
                [ 6 ] Department of Restorative Dentistry, Periodontology, Endodontology, Preventive Dentistry and Pediatric Dentistry University Medicine Greifswald Greifswald Germany
                [ 7 ] Department of Prosthodontics Faculty of Medicine University of Würzburg Würzburg Germany
                [ 8 ] Section of Prosthetic Dentistry Department of Dentistry and Oral Health Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark
                [ 9 ] Private Practice Isernhagen Germany
                [ 10 ] Private Practice Herlev Denmark
                [ 11 ] Department of Dental Medicine Karolinska Institutet Huddinge Sweden
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Frank Lobbezoo, Department of Orofacial Pain and Dysfunction, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

                Email: f.lobbezoo@ 123456acta.nl

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9877-7640
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6677-7897
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9536-7259
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1109-2364
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2887-8857
                Article
                JOOR12876
                10.1111/joor.12876
                7004009
                31430389
                10e08cfc-9fbe-4f97-9d38-fc314a28ea70
                © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 30 April 2019
                : 23 July 2019
                : 07 August 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 3, Pages: 6, Words: 4348
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                February 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.7.5 mode:remove_FC converted:06.02.2020

                Dentistry
                assessment,clinical guideline,contingent electrical stimulation,electromyography,management,sleep bruxism

                Comments

                Comment on this article