0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Effect of cool temperature dialysate on the quality and patients' perception of haemodialysis

      ,
      Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Preventing dialysis hypotension: a comparison of usual protective maneuvers.

          Intradialytic hypotension (IH) is a common adverse event. Currently, there are several commonly utilized therapies of IH, but they have not been compared directly in the same group of patients. We performed the present study in order to learn which of these techniques is most effective so that a rational approach to treating IH could then be formulated. A single-blinded, crossover study design of five different protocols was undertaken in 10 hemodialysis patients with a prior history of IH. Each patient first underwent one week (three dialyses) of standard dialysis (dialysate sodium 138 mEq/L). Then each patient was subjected to one week each (three dialyses) of the four test protocols, performed in random order in a blinded fashion. The specific protocols were as follows: high sodium dialysate, in which the patient was dialyzed using a dialysate sodium of 144 mEq/L; sodium modeling, during which the dialysate sodium declined from 152 to 140 mEq/L in the last half hour of dialysis; one hour of isolated ultrafiltration followed by three hours of isovolemic dialysis; and cool temperature dialysis in which the dialysate was cooled to 35 degrees C. Weight loss in each of the five protocols was essentially identical, varying between 2.9 and 3 kg. There were significantly fewer hypotensive episodes per treatment in the sodium modeling, high sodium, and cool temperature protocols as compared with the standard protocol (P < 0.05). Ultrafiltration followed by dialysis was associated with a significantly greater number of hypotensive episodes per treatment than any of the three test protocols (P < 0.05). Similarly, the number of nursing interventions required for IH per treatment was significantly greater in the standard dialysis and in the isolated ultrafiltration protocols compared with sodium modeling and cool temperature protocols (P < 0.05). The number of hypotensive signs and symptoms per treatment was also significantly reduced during the sodium modeling and cool temperature protocols compared with the standard protocol (P < 0.004 and P < 0.02, respectively). Again, the isolated ultrafiltration protocol resulted in significantly more hypotensive symptoms and signs than the three test protocols (P < 0.005). Finally, the nadir mean arterial pressures were significantly lower in the standard and isolated ultrafiltration protocols when compared with the three test protocols (P < 0.05). The upright postdialysis blood pressure was best preserved in the sodium modeling and cool temperature protocols compared with the standard and isolated ultrafiltration protocols (P < 0.05). This study supports the use of sodium modeling as a first step in combating IH. Also effective were the use of cool-temperature dialysate and a high-sodium dialysate. All three test protocols were well tolerated. As applied in this study, isolated ultrafiltration followed by isovolemic dialysis was notably less effective in reducing IH.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The protective effect of cool dialysate is dependent on patients' predialysis temperature.

            A significant proportion of hemodialysis patients have subnormal body temperature. Dialysis against cool dialysate has been frequently shown to reduce the incidence of symptomatic hypotension (SH), although only one of these reports included patient temperatures. Our hypothesis was that the response to cool or normal temperature dialysis could depend on a patient's baseline temperature. Of 128 patients in two hemodialysis units, 28 had a (mean of 5) baseline temperature less than 36 degrees C and 48 patients had a temperature higher than 36.5 degrees C. A crossover study was performed by dialyzing patients for 10 consecutive treatments with the same dialysate temperature, either 37 degrees C or 35 degrees C. All patients combined had a significant reduction in SH with 35 degrees C dialysate, 11.2% versus 5.5% with 37 degrees C dialysate (P = 0.001). The incidence of SH in euthermic patients was not affected by dialysate temperature. Hypothermic patients dialyzed against 37 degrees C dialysate had the highest incidence of SH, which decreased markedly with 35 degrees C dialysate (15.9% v 3.4%; P = 0.0001). There were no differences in age, duration of dialysis, gender, hemoglobin, urea, creatinine, or volume removed per dialysis between the two groups. In conclusion, subnormal temperature is common in dialysis patients but the etiology is unclear. The hemodynamic protective effect of cool dialysate only occurs in patients with subnormal temperatures. Only the subpopulation of patients with SH and low body temperature should be dialyzed against cool dialysate.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Epidemiology of Symptomatic Hypotension in Hemodialysis: Is Cool Dialysate Beneficial for All Patients?

              A prospective study on hypotension in hemodialysis was performed in 60 nondiabetic patients at two different dialysate temperatures during 12 months. A 37 °C bath (3,723 sessions) was used and after the first 6 months the temperature was changed to 35 °C (4,019 sessions). The prevalence of symptomatic hypotension was 15.3% and it was closely correlated with the presence of other symptoms. The most affected populations were women, patients over 55 years of age, patients with low body surface area and patients with a cardiovascular disease. A slight but significant decrease of symptomatic hypotension was seen by using a 35 °C dialysate (16.4 vs. 14.3%, p < 0.01). In patients with frequent hypotension (in up to 30% of sessions), cool dialysate significantly reduced the incidence of the symptom (44.2 vs. 34.1 %, p < 0.001). These results were obtained in spite of a greater interdialysis weight gain at low temperature (2 ± 0.6 vs. 1.9 ± 0.7 kg, p < 0.001). We consider that low-temperature dialysis is a simple, useful and economic procedure, especially for highly symptomatic patients. The association of cooling dialysate with higher sodium concentration, bicarbonate and special membranes could reduce dialysis symptoms dramatically.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
                Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                0931-0509
                1460-2385
                January 12 2004
                January 01 2004
                January 01 2004
                : 19
                : 1
                : 190-194
                Article
                10.1093/ndt/gfg512
                10f77bdb-ddfa-4720-8378-5285dcb3d551
                © 2004
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article