10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluation of a patient decision aid for initiating disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          According to international guidelines, treatment of inflammatory arthritis should be based on a shared decision between patient and rheumatologist. Furthermore, patients with inflammatory arthritis have high need of information and want to be more actively involved in medical decision-making. To facilitate shared decision-making and support patients in choosing between disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), a web-based patient decision aid (PtDA) was developed. This study evaluated use, appreciation and effect of this PtDA.

          Methods

          A post-test only study with a historical comparison group was conducted. In a two-year period, all patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis, who were deciding whether to start a (different) DMARD were invited to participate. In the first year, patients received standard information (comparison group). In the second year, patients were referred to the PtDA (intervention group). In both groups, a questionnaire was sent four weeks after consulting the rheumatologist. Patient characteristics included sociodemographic, health-related and preference-related variables. Process measures were for use and appraisal of the PtDA (intervention group only). The primary outcome measure was patients’ perceived role in medical decision-making. Secondary outcome measures comprised satisfaction with the decision-making process and the decision, beliefs about medication, adherence to medication and trust in the physician.

          Results

          We received 158/232 questionnaires (68 %) from the comparison group and 123/200 (61 %) from the intervention group. The PtDA was used by 69/123 patients (57 %) in the intervention group. Patients who used the PtDA highly appreciated it and perceived it as easy to use and helpful. Relative to the comparison group, patients in the intervention group perceived a more active role in medical decision-making and decisions were more in line with patients’ personal preferences. Other outcomes showed no significant difference between the two groups.

          Conclusion

          The web-based PtDA was highly appreciated and perceived as helpful for decision-making. Implementation of the PtDA in rheumatology practice was associated with a significantly larger proportion of patients perceiving an active role in medical decision-making and decisions were more in line with patients’ personal preferences. The PtDA can be a valuable aid in improving patient participation in decision-making about DMARDs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Control Preferences Scale.

          The Control Preferences Scale (CPS) was developed to measure a construct that emerged from a grounded theory of how treatment decisions are made among people with life-threatening illnesses. The control preferences construct is defined as "the degree of control an individual wants to assume when decisions are being made about medical treatment." The CPS consists of five cards that each portrays a different role in treatment decision-making using a statement and a cartoon. These roles range from the individual making the treatment decisions, through the individual making the decisions jointly with the physician, to the physician making the decisions. The CPS involves subjects in making a series of paired comparisons to provide their total preference order over the five cards. These preference orders are analyzed using unfolding theory to determine the distribution of preferences in different populations and the effect of covariates on consumer preferences. The scale has been tested in a variety of populations, ranging from the general public to highly stressed groups. The CPS has proven to be a clinically relevant, easily administered, valid, and reliable measure of preferred roles in health-care decision-making.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Designing for usability: key principles and what designers think

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              User involvement: A review of the benefits and challenges

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +31 614763430 , i.nota@utwente.nl
                c.h.c.drossaert@utwente.nl
                e.taal@utwente.nl
                h.vonkeman@mst.nl
                c.haagsma@zgt.nl
                m.vandelaar@mst.nl
                Journal
                Arthritis Res Ther
                Arthritis Res. Ther
                Arthritis Research & Therapy
                BioMed Central (London )
                1478-6354
                1478-6362
                28 October 2016
                28 October 2016
                2016
                : 18
                : 252
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
                [2 ]Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, PO Box 50 000, 7500 KA Enschede, The Netherlands
                [3 ]Department of Rheumatology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, PO Box 7600, 7600 SZ Almelo, The Netherlands
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4106-1286
                Article
                1138
                10.1186/s13075-016-1138-3
                5086044
                27793171
                11101953-82ea-4115-b8a7-8579e3dedf60
                © The Author(s). 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 21 May 2016
                : 27 September 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100006315, Reumafonds;
                Award ID: 8 - 1 - 406
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Orthopedics
                shared decision-making,patient participation,inflammatory arthritis,dmards,patient decision aid

                Comments

                Comment on this article