8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Contribution of individual COPD assessment test (CAT) items to CAT total score and effects of pulmonary rehabilitation on CAT scores

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) contains eight items (cough, phlegm, chest tightness, breathlessness, limited activities, confidence leaving home, sleeplessness and energy). The current study aimed 1) to better understand the impact of the respiratory and non-respiratory CAT item scores on the CAT total score; and 2) to determine the impact of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on CAT items and CAT total score.

          Methods

          CAT total score of ≥10 or ≥ 18 points was used to classify patients as highly symptomatic, a decrease of 2 points was considered as clinically relevant improvement. ‘Cough’, ‘phlegm’, ‘chest tightness’, ‘breathlessness’ were defined as respiratory items; ≥3 points on each item was defined as highly symptomatic.

          Results

          In total, 497 clinically stable patients (55% male, age 64.0 (57.5–71.0) years, FEV 1 46.0 (32.0–63.0)% predicted, CAT total score 22.0 (17.5–26.0) points) were included. 95% had CAT score ≥ 10 points and 75% ≥18 points. Respectively, 45% and 54% of subjects scored high on 3 or 4 of the respiratory CAT items. Following PR, 220 patients (57.7%) reported an improved health status as assessed by CAT total score (− 3.0 (− 7.0–1.0) points). Change in CAT item scores ranged from 0.0 (− 1.0–0.0) to − 1.0 (− 2.0–0.0) points) with best improvements in ‘energy’ (− 1.0 (− 2.0–0.0)points).

          Conclusions

          A substantial number of patients classified as highly symptomatic did not report a high level of respiratory symptoms, indicating that non-respiratory symptoms impact on disease classification and treatment algorithm. The impact of PR on CAT item scores varied by individual item.

          Trial registration

          Netherlands National Trial Register ( NTR3416). Registered 2 May 2012.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s12955-018-1034-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The COPD assessment test (CAT): response to pulmonary rehabilitation. A multicentre, prospective study.

          The COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) assessment test (CAT) is a recently introduced, simple to use patient-completed quality of life instrument that contains eight questions covering the impact of symptoms in COPD. It is not known how the CAT score performs in the context of clinical pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programmes or what the minimum clinically important difference is. The introduction of the CAT score as an outcome measure was prospectively studied by PR programmes across London. It was used alongside other measures including the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire, the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire, the Clinical COPD Questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression score, the Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea score and a range of different walking tests. Patients completed a 5-point anchor question used to assess overall response to PR from 'I feel much better' to 'I feel much worse'. Data were available for 261 patients with COPD participating in seven programmes: mean (SD) age 69.0 (9.0) years, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) 51.1 (18.7) % predicted, MRC score 3.2 (1.0). Mean change in CAT score after PR was 2.9 (5.6) points, improving by 3.8 (6.1) points in those scoring 'much better' (n=162), and by 1.3(4.5) in those who felt 'a little better' (n=88) (p=0.002). Only eight individuals reported no difference after PR and three reported feeling 'a little worse', so comparison with these smaller groups was not possible. The CAT score is simple to implement as an outcome measure, it improves in response to PR and can distinguish categories of response.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Creating scenarios of the impact of copd and their relationship to copd assessment test (CAT™) scores

              Background The COPD Assessment Test (CAT™) is a new short health status measure for routine use. New questionnaires require reference points so that users can understand the scores; descriptive scenarios are one way of doing this. A novel method of creating scenarios is described. Methods A Bland and Altman plot showed a consistent relationship between CAT scores and scores obtained with the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire for COPD (SGRQ-C) permitting a direct mapping process between CAT and SGRQ items. The severity associated with each CAT item was calculated using a probabilistic model and expressed in logits (log odds of a patient of given severity affirming that item 50% of the time). Severity estimates for SGRQ-C items in logits were also available, allowing direct comparisons with CAT items. CAT scores were categorised into Low, Medium, High and Very High Impact. SGRQ items of corresponding severity were used to create scenarios associated with each category. Results Each CAT category was associated with a scenario comprising 12 to 16 SGRQ-C items. A severity 'ladder' associating CAT scores with exemplar health status effects was also created. Items associated with 'Low' and 'Medium' Impact appeared to be subjectively quite severe in terms of their effect on daily life. Conclusions These scenarios provide users of the CAT with a good sense of the health impact associated with different scores. More generally they provide a surprising insight into the severity of the effects of COPD, even in patients with apparently mild-moderate health status impact.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +31-0-475-587-602 , sarahwilke@ciro-horn.nl
                daisyjanssen@ciro-horn.nl
                fritsfranssen@ciro-horn.nl
                lowievanfleteren@ciro-horn.nl
                e.wouters@mumc.nl
                martijnspruit@ciro-horn.nl
                Journal
                Health Qual Life Outcomes
                Health Qual Life Outcomes
                Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
                BioMed Central (London )
                1477-7525
                30 October 2018
                30 October 2018
                2018
                : 16
                : 205
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.491136.8, Department of Research and Education, , CIRO, ; Hornerheide 1, Horn, 6085 NM The Netherlands
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0480 1382, GRID grid.412966.e, Centre of Expertise for Palliative Care, , Maastricht University Medical Center, ; Maastricht, The Netherlands
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0480 1382, GRID grid.412966.e, Department of Respiratory Medicine, , Maastricht University Medical Center, ; Maastricht, The Netherlands
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9919 9582, GRID grid.8761.8, COPD center, , Sahlgrenska University Hospital and Institute of Medicine, Gothenburg University, ; Gothenburg, Sweden
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0480 1382, GRID grid.412966.e, Department of Respiratory Medicine, , Maastricht University Medical Center, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, ; Maastricht, The Netherlands
                Article
                1034
                10.1186/s12955-018-1034-4
                6208036
                30376861
                11265390-b2bd-4a59-9036-7c283ffb5f10
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 29 May 2018
                : 17 October 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: Lung Foundation Netherlands
                Award ID: 3.4.10.015
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004330, GlaxoSmithKline;
                Award ID: SCO115406
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Health & Social care
                health status,copd assessment test,gold classification,pulmonary rehabilitation

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content77

                Cited by23

                Most referenced authors473