146
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Pyruvate kinase M2 activators promote tetramer formation and suppress tumorigenesis

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 3 , 3 , 4 , 4 , 5 , 5 , 5 , 4 , 6 , 7 , 3 , 8 , 3 , 1 , 2 , 9 , 3 , 3 , 7 , 4 , 4 , 4 , 4 , 4 , 4 , 3 , 3 , 7 , 7 , 3 , 1 , 4 , 4 , 10 , 1 , 11 , 6 , 7 , 7 , 7 , 4 , 5 , 12 , 1 , 2 , 4 , 3 , 9
      Nature chemical biology

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cancer cells engage in a metabolic program to enhance biosynthesis and support cell proliferation. The regulatory properties of pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) influence altered glucose metabolism in cancer. PKM2 interaction with phosphotyrosine-containing proteins inhibits enzyme activity and increases availability of glycolytic metabolites to support cell proliferation. This suggests that high pyruvate kinase activity may suppress tumor growth. We show that expression of PKM1, the pyruvate kinase isoform with high constitutive activity, or exposure to published small molecule PKM2 activators inhibit growth of xenograft tumors. Structural studies reveal that small molecule activators bind PKM2 at the subunit interaction interface, a site distinct from that of the endogenous activator fructose-1,6-bisphosphate (FBP). However, unlike FBP, binding of activators to PKM2 promotes a constitutively active enzyme state that is resistant to inhibition by tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins. These data support the notion that small molecule activation of PKM2 can interfere with anabolic metabolism.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Pyruvate kinase M2 is a PHD3-stimulated coactivator for hypoxia-inducible factor 1.

          The pyruvate kinase isoforms PKM1 and PKM2 are alternatively spliced products of the PKM2 gene. PKM2, but not PKM1, alters glucose metabolism in cancer cells and contributes to tumorigenesis by mechanisms that are not explained by its known biochemical activity. We show that PKM2 gene transcription is activated by hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1). PKM2 interacts directly with the HIF-1α subunit and promotes transactivation of HIF-1 target genes by enhancing HIF-1 binding and p300 recruitment to hypoxia response elements, whereas PKM1 fails to regulate HIF-1 activity. Interaction of PKM2 with prolyl hydroxylase 3 (PHD3) enhances PKM2 binding to HIF-1α and PKM2 coactivator function. Mass spectrometry and anti-hydroxyproline antibody assays demonstrate PKM2 hydroxylation on proline-403/408. PHD3 knockdown inhibits PKM2 coactivator function, reduces glucose uptake and lactate production, and increases O(2) consumption in cancer cells. Thus, PKM2 participates in a positive feedback loop that promotes HIF-1 transactivation and reprograms glucose metabolism in cancer cells. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            The control of the metabolic switch in cancers by oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes.

            Cells from some tumors use an altered metabolic pattern compared with that of normal differentiated adult cells in the body. Tumor cells take up much more glucose and mainly process it through aerobic glycolysis, producing large quantities of secreted lactate with a lower use of oxidative phosphorylation that would generate more adenosine triphosphate (ATP), water, and carbon dioxide. This is the Warburg effect, which provides substrates for cell growth and division and free energy (ATP) from enhanced glucose use. This metabolic switch places the emphasis on producing intermediates for cell growth and division, and it is regulated by both oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes in a number of key cancer-producing pathways. Blocking these metabolic pathways or restoring these altered pathways could lead to a new approach in cancer treatments.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Targeting metabolic transformation for cancer therapy.

              Cancer therapy has long relied on the rapid proliferation of tumour cells for effective treatment. However, the lack of specificity in this approach often leads to undesirable side effects. Many reports have described various 'metabolic transformation' events that enable cancer cells to survive, suggesting that metabolic pathways might be good targets. There are currently several drugs under development or in clinical trials that are based on specifically targeting the altered metabolic pathways of tumours. This Review highlights pathways against which there are already drugs in different stages of development and also discusses additional druggable targets.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                101231976
                32624
                Nat Chem Biol
                Nat. Chem. Biol.
                Nature chemical biology
                1552-4450
                1552-4469
                7 September 2012
                October 2012
                15 July 2013
                : 8
                : 10
                : 839-847
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Medicine-Division of Signal Transduction, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02115, USA
                [2 ]Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
                [3 ]Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
                [4 ]NIH Chemical Genomics Center, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
                [5 ]Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada
                [6 ]Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
                [7 ]Agios Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
                [8 ]Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA
                [9 ]Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
                [10 ]Department of Pathology, Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
                [11 ]Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
                [12 ]Department of Pharmacology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1L7, Canada
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: Matthew G. Vander Heiden, Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA, Tel: +1 617 715 4471, Fax: +1 617 253 3189, mvh@ 123456mit.edu
                [§]

                These authors contributed equally to this work

                Article
                HHMIMS397945
                10.1038/nchembio.1060
                3711671
                22922757
                1151eae7-ab80-4e3a-b900-44f54b379ce5
                History
                Funding
                Funded by: Howard Hughes Medical Institute :
                Award ID: || HHMI_
                Categories
                Article

                Biochemistry
                Biochemistry

                Comments

                Comment on this article