13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Change in Speech Perception and Auditory Evoked Potentials over Time after Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Postlingually Deaf Adults

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Speech perception varies widely across cochlear implant (CI) users and typically improves over time after implantation. There is also some evidence for improved auditory evoked potentials (shorter latencies, larger amplitudes) after implantation but few longitudinal studies have examined the relationship between behavioral and evoked potential measures after implantation in postlingually deaf adults. The relationship between speech perception and auditory evoked potentials was investigated in newly implanted cochlear implant users from the day of implant activation to 9 months postimplantation, on five occasions, in 10 adults age 27 to 57 years who had been bilaterally profoundly deaf for 1 to 30 years prior to receiving a unilateral CI24 cochlear implant. Changes over time in middle latency response (MLR), mismatch negativity, and obligatory cortical auditory evoked potentials and word and sentence speech perception scores were examined. Speech perception improved significantly over the 9-month period. MLRs varied and showed no consistent change over time. Three participants aged in their 50s had absent MLRs. The pattern of change in N1 amplitudes over the five visits varied across participants. P2 area increased significantly for 1,000- and 4,000-Hz tones but not for 250 Hz. The greatest change in P2 area occurred after 6 months of implant experience. Although there was a trend for mismatch negativity peak latency to reduce and width to increase after 3 months of implant experience, there was considerable variability and these changes were not significant. Only 60% of participants had a detectable mismatch initially; this increased to 100% at 9 months. The continued change in P2 area over the period evaluated, with a trend for greater change for right hemisphere recordings, is consistent with the pattern of incremental change in speech perception scores over time. MLR, N1, and mismatch negativity changes were inconsistent and hence P2 may be a more robust measure of auditory plasticity in adult implant recipients. P2 was still improving at 9 months postimplantation. Future studies should explore longitudinal changes over a longer period.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Semin Hear
          Semin Hear
          10.1055/s-00000067
          Seminars in Hearing
          Thieme Medical Publishers (333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. )
          0734-0451
          1098-8955
          February 2016
          : 37
          : 1
          : 62-73
          Affiliations
          [1 ] School of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
          Author notes
          Address for correspondence Suzanne C. Purdy, Ph.D. School of Psychology, University of Auckland New Zealand, Tamaki Campus (Room 721.319) 261 Morrin Road, Glen Innes, Private Bag 92019, Auckland New Zealand sc.purdy@ 123456auckland.ac.nz
          Article
          PMC4910565 PMC4910565 4910565 00694
          10.1055/s-0035-1570329
          4910565
          27587923
          11664779-ebe4-4269-8d17-64b9088a669b
          © Thieme Medical Publishers
          History
          Categories
          Article

          mismatch negativity,P2,N1,cortical auditory evoked potential,middle latency response,speech perception,Cochlear implant

          Comments

          Comment on this article